why you should never get involved with in a game with a chef
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
why you should never get involved with in a game with a chef
-at my school's library so I have a super slow connection speed on my laptop
-could possibly be the unluckiest player to every play on CC (no seriously)
-i either win 7 points or lose 30.. no equity in playing a chef
I'm about to lose to a complete donkey that i should have never joined up with.
-could possibly be the unluckiest player to every play on CC (no seriously)
-i either win 7 points or lose 30.. no equity in playing a chef
I'm about to lose to a complete donkey that i should have never joined up with.
Re: why you should never get involved with in a game with a
Stop thinking so highly of yourself, you're a cook not a chef.bxball wrote:no equity in playing a chef
- Sir. Ricco
- Posts: 4555
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:33 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Making kingdoms burn and bloodshed start.
- Contact:
- Herakilla
- Posts: 4283
- Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:33 pm
- Location: Wandering the world, spreading Conquerism
lol ya! i lost to the same cook 2x on age of might i think, but my other wins made p for it! jeez lol it aint that bad
Come join us in Live Chat!
- BaldAdonis
- Posts: 2334
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:57 am
- Location: Trapped in Pleasantville with Toby McGuire
Re: why you should never get involved with in a game with a
Consider yourself lucky.bxball wrote:i either win 7 points or lose 30
Re: why you should never get involved with in a game with a
Start complaining when you get an endless stream of challenges fron cooks demanding to play you at a ratio of 100 points to 3bxball wrote:-at my school's library so I have a super slow connection speed on my laptop
-could possibly be the unluckiest player to every play on CC (no seriously)
-i either win 7 points or lose 30.. no equity in playing a chef
I'm about to lose to a complete donkey that i should have never joined up with.
Im a TOFU miSfit
- owenshooter
- Posts: 13360
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx
-
ParadiceCity9
- Posts: 4239
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:10 pm
- Dancing Mustard
- Posts: 5442
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
- Location: Pushing Buttons
- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12730
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
- Herakilla
- Posts: 4283
- Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:33 pm
- Location: Wandering the world, spreading Conquerism
hear hear!Dancing Mustard wrote:If only so I could say 'Hellooooo Nurse', everytime I played one. That'd make me lol.Heimdall wrote:They should create a nurse rank too
Come join us in Live Chat!
- pimphawks70
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:21 am
- EmperorOfDaNorth
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:52 am
- Location: Chiang Mai, Siam
Personally I like to play a mix of people in the same game. The only rank that I actually avoid is the Question Mark, though sometimes if they've completed some games then it's okay. And Question Marks are actually worth more points than Cookies are.
So I think it's good to have some lower ranked players in there, makes for more exciting games. "Cookies & Captains -- the perfect mix for gaining a bucket of points!" that's what I always say.
And you can mess with their heads. Like when a Captain tries a blocking move in Escalating towards Australia, you say stuff like "Oooh, Captain Red is moving in on your turf there Cookie..! I sure hope you have cards or your ass is toast!" Captains get upset at that, I love it.
Then afterwards I say stuff like:
"Awesome moves there Cookie, weakening Teal in S. America and getting his glorious 2-bonus army continent!! When cards value is at 20! I dind't have a set, but Teals cards came in mighty handy! Good game there Cookie, throw another shrimp on the barbie there in heaven will ya?
Though the sarcasm is often lost on them, IF they see it at all cause they're usually dead by the time I start my dripping sarcasm.
So I think it's good to have some lower ranked players in there, makes for more exciting games. "Cookies & Captains -- the perfect mix for gaining a bucket of points!" that's what I always say.
And you can mess with their heads. Like when a Captain tries a blocking move in Escalating towards Australia, you say stuff like "Oooh, Captain Red is moving in on your turf there Cookie..! I sure hope you have cards or your ass is toast!" Captains get upset at that, I love it.
Then afterwards I say stuff like:
"Awesome moves there Cookie, weakening Teal in S. America and getting his glorious 2-bonus army continent!! When cards value is at 20! I dind't have a set, but Teals cards came in mighty handy! Good game there Cookie, throw another shrimp on the barbie there in heaven will ya?
Though the sarcasm is often lost on them, IF they see it at all cause they're usually dead by the time I start my dripping sarcasm.
Alex..? Alexander the Great, my Commander, what's wrong? Did someone leave you negative feedback again?
- EmperorOfDaNorth
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:52 am
- Location: Chiang Mai, Siam
Well, they do unpredictable things. Which can be fun and exciting, but if higher level players are playing a game they want it to be strategy to win it, not because Cookie decided he can hold Europe on turn 4 in an Escalating game and smashes all is toys into a random player there.
Alex..? Alexander the Great, my Commander, what's wrong? Did someone leave you negative feedback again?
I am on my way to being a chef myself.
I was a great player on the board game, but have a heck of a time on here.
Does anyone else think that you should get to place your armies after all the countries are picked? I think its very hard to take countries that have 3 on them, when your attacking with 6, especially when you get crappy dice. This leads to desperation on my part if I lose such a battle and I end up attacking 3 against 3 to get my card. Any thoughts on this appreciated.
Thanks Future Cook.... LOL
Does anyone else think that you should get to place your armies after all the countries are picked? I think its very hard to take countries that have 3 on them, when your attacking with 6, especially when you get crappy dice. This leads to desperation on my part if I lose such a battle and I end up attacking 3 against 3 to get my card. Any thoughts on this appreciated.
Thanks Future Cook.... LOL
- Risktaker17
- Posts: 1495
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:09 am
-
codeblue1018
- Posts: 1016
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 5:08 pm
Re: why you should never get involved with in a game with a
bxball wrote:-at my school's library so I have a super slow connection speed on my laptop
-could possibly be the unluckiest player to every play on CC (no seriously)
-i either win 7 points or lose 30.. no equity in playing a chef
I'm about to lose to a complete donkey that i should have never joined up with.
do you people realy put that much on your ranks? I come here to play some good games of risk with however wants to play, on whatever settings they want. it's no big deal. I'd probably have a much better rank if I stuck to settings and maps I'm good at, but I come to have fun and play whatever game there is.
I'd say **** you, but I'm not a cook... never have been... yet...wacicha wrote:Some of my best games have had cooks and ? in them you really got to watch them and check out all active games to see what they may be thinking
I was 5 points from it once! I won a three way though, then a game against a captain.




