Mission - Survive the Longest [Winner: lord voldemort]

by **Kinnison** on Mon Nov 19, 2007 11:54 pm

Yeah, it's been listed as full in the title... not sure why it didn't get moved... *shrug*

by **Sir. Ricco** on Tue Nov 20, 2007 9:36 am

amazzony wrote:Shouldn't it be in Ongoing?

You tell me. I asked opi twice and twill once. They just won't move it.
I say "Can you move this to ongoing (Insert url WITH URL CODE!)
Thanks"
and nothing. I will try steel next.

by **Sir. Ricco** on Tue Nov 20, 2007 9:58 am

finally steel has moved it!

by **Chadwick31** on Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:03 pm

Defeated AtreidesHouse in 4 Rounds

by **luckyderus** on Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:40 pm

defeated lucky_topher in round 4.

by **danodukebb** on Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:15 pm

btw my record is wrong in the standings im 1-0 not 0-1

by **danodukebb** on Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:19 pm

correction:

2-0 i won round two in 4 rounds

by **danodukebb** on Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:20 pm

oh wait...

sorry for another post

but im on the board twice once for my 1-0 and then at the bottom it says 0-1...im thinking you just put my name for the 0-1 instead of someone else...

by **khellendros** on Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:36 pm

Huh...I guess my partner didn't post his victory, but he beat me in tbones3491 beats khellendros in round six

by **denominator** on Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:52 pm

I must say, this tournament is surprising me. I expected people to last longer, not this rapid fire we're experiencing.

by **Kinnison** on Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:17 pm

Well, it IS an 18-territory map. 6 per player... unless someone gets a chokepoint drop (not much chance of that on this map) I'm not TOO surprised at the results.

by **Sir. Ricco** on Sat Nov 24, 2007 11:48 am

I had a little mix up with the games but round 2 will end soon.

by **Reel_Big_Fish** on Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:43 pm

whens round 3 starting?

by **lucky_topher** on Sat Nov 24, 2007 3:09 pm

so how does this work since there were two people to get elim'd in round 4?

by **Sir. Ricco** on Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:15 pm

lucky_topher wrote:so how does this work since there were two people to get elim'd in round 4?

There were?

by **lucky_topher** on Sat Nov 24, 2007 6:37 pm

luckyderus wrote:defeated lucky_topher in round 4.

Chadwick31 wrote:Defeated AtreidesHouse in 4 Rounds

by **lucky_topher** on Sat Nov 24, 2007 6:40 pm

and it says:

In case of tie Elimination (example: two players lost in 4 rounds) the player with the most elimination wins. if it is still tied, best record wins

we both have 0-1....

by **denominator** on Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:35 pm

lucky_topher wrote:and it says:

In case of tie Elimination (example: two players lost in 4 rounds) the player with the most elimination wins. if it is still tied, best record wins

we both have 0-1....

I would say you have a playoff game coming up.

by **Sir. Ricco** on Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:42 pm

denominator wrote:
lucky_topher wrote:and it says:

In case of tie Elimination (example: two players lost in 4 rounds) the player with the most elimination wins. if it is still tied, best record wins

we both have 0-1....

I would say you have a playoff game coming up.

There will be no playoffs. Record of the winner and loser and the number of eliminations by the winner and loser will be factored in.

by **Sir. Ricco** on Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:45 pm

So far AtreidesHouse is going to get eliminated becuase he/she lost to a 0-1 player unlike lucky_topher who lost to a 1-0 player confusing i know.

by **Kinnison** on Sat Nov 24, 2007 8:37 pm

lucky_topher wrote:
luckyderus wrote:defeated lucky_topher in round 4.

Chadwick31 wrote:Defeated AtreidesHouse in 4 Rounds

Actually, I lost in 4 rounds to danodukdebb, but they were 1-0 at the time, so...

Sir. Ricco wrote:So far AtreidesHouse is going to get eliminated becuase he/she lost to a 0-1 player unlike lucky_topher who lost to a 1-0 player confusing i know.

that remains unchanged.