What came first the chicken or the egg?

The Weird One · Post by **The Weird One** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:16 pm

between that and my reasoning. . . it WAS the egg

bedub1 · Post by **bedub1** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:49 pm

I was flipping through the dictionary the other day...and chicken is definitely before egg.

The Weird One · Post by **The Weird One** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:50 pm

I read my books upsidedown

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:53 pm

Seeing that you need a chicken to lay an egg AND an egg can not survive by itself (something needs to sit on it for it to grow and hatch). The CHICKEN came first! End of debate.

borox0 · Post by **borox0** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:10 pm

Chickens are the products of eggs, thus permanently solving the problem.

The Weird One · Post by **The Weird One** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:16 pm

ogr8cdd · Post by **ogr8cdd** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:56 am

Genghis Khant wrote:I honestly couldn't say... I've never fucked an egg.

It begs asking, how many times have you done a chicken?
and how quickly do they come?

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:00 am

The egg, obviously. A t-rex is the closest relative to a chicken, even if it's dead. T-rex's laid eggs. After a time they would of adapted to suit the environment and change from the dying species of dinosaurs

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:13 am

Skittles! wrote:The egg, obviously. A t-rex is the closest relative to a chicken, even if it's dead. T-rex's laid eggs. After a time they would of adapted to suit the environment and change from the dying species of dinosaurs

This is assuming that you BUY the whole evolution myth.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:15 am

jay_a2j wrote:
Skittles! wrote:The egg, obviously. A t-rex is the closest relative to a chicken, even if it's dead. T-rex's laid eggs. After a time they would of adapted to suit the environment and change from the dying species of dinosaurs

This is assuming that you BUY the whole evolution myth.

Indeedly. You can't call it a myth, you call it a theory. Just like creationism, it's a theory.

Jay, spell it out.

T-H-E-O-R-Y

Don't call it a myth otherwise it'll make you look even more close minded than you are.

Genghis Khant · Post by **Genghis Khant** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:31 am

jay_a2j wrote:
Skittles! wrote:The egg, obviously. A t-rex is the closest relative to a chicken, even if it's dead. T-rex's laid eggs. After a time they would of adapted to suit the environment and change from the dying species of dinosaurs

This is assuming that you BUY the whole evolution myth.

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

Very funny, Jay.... it's the way you tell 'em

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:41 am

Skittles! wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Skittles! wrote:The egg, obviously. A t-rex is the closest relative to a chicken, even if it's dead. T-rex's laid eggs. After a time they would of adapted to suit the environment and change from the dying species of dinosaurs

This is assuming that you BUY the whole evolution myth.
Indeedly. You can't call it a myth, you call it a theory. Just like creationism, it's a theory.

Jay, spell it out.

T-H-E-O-R-Y

Don't call it a myth otherwise it'll make you look even more close minded than you are.

Hey, if it works for backglass, it works for me. My mind is closed to things that would lead me away from what is right.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:42 am

But you are not Backglass, so come up with your own lines.

Titanic · Post by **Titanic** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:12 am

The Weird One wrote:oh, and the egg came first because reptilian dinosaurs were laying eggs long before chickens came around

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:54 am

muy_thaiguy wrote:
The Weird One wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Well, aren't Dinosaurs the ancestors of Chickens and other birds?
but he asked CHICKENS not their ancestors
Dinos were basically Chickens without feathers! [size=0](And weigh several tonnes)[/size]

No they were nothing like chickens. Unless you count only the later ones and then there were a few who bore a resemblance but the less chicken-like ones came before them and laid their eggs. Thus, eggs came first.

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:00 am

Well, a chicken had to hatch from the egg of whatever it evolved from, so still egg even if we are just talking about eggs chickens hatch from and not eggs in general.

0ojakeo0 · Post by **0ojakeo0** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:43 pm

Obvipusly chicken egg

fireedud · Post by **fireedud** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:47 pm

The Weird One wrote:I read my books upsidedown

me too, seriously.

One day in school, I even through a whole 45-minute period reading and writing upside-down.

willis · Post by **willis** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:48 pm

I know what came first...

0ojakeo0 · Post by **0ojakeo0** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:55 pm

willis wrote:I know what came first...

yays

Norse · Post by **Norse** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:56 pm

riggable wrote:
Koronna wrote:WRONG!

you didn't specify which egg or which chicken, so it can be the egg i had for breakfast and the chicken i had 5 weeks ago...
That made no sense..

so, when you "had" this chicken 5 weeks ago....was it of any relation to your egg you ate this morning?

Koronna · Post by **Koronna** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:00 pm

Norse wrote:
riggable wrote:
Koronna wrote:WRONG!

you didn't specify which egg or which chicken, so it can be the egg i had for breakfast and the chicken i had 5 weeks ago...
That made no sense..
so, when you "had" this chicken 5 weeks ago....was it of any relation to your egg you ate this morning?

nope, the chicken and the egg came from different cities

bedub1 · Post by **bedub1** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:13 pm

0ojakeo0 wrote:
willis wrote:I know what came first...

yays

Please post that in the thread about the boob song

AndrewLC · Post by **AndrewLC** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:05 pm

Skittles! wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Skittles! wrote:The egg, obviously. A t-rex is the closest relative to a chicken, even if it's dead. T-rex's laid eggs. After a time they would of adapted to suit the environment and change from the dying species of dinosaurs

This is assuming that you BUY the whole evolution myth.
Indeedly. You can't call it a myth, you call it a theory. Just like creationism, it's a theory.

Jay, spell it out.

T-H-E-O-R-Y

Don't call it a myth otherwise it'll make you look even more close minded than you are.

Actually theres no evidence backing creation up, therefor its a hypothosis

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Sat Oct 13, 2007 3:23 am

Fircoal wrote:WRONG!

The question clearly implies that jake is a retard.

hey, he's making an attempt at a stupid question that may spark intelligent discussion.