Moderator: Community Team
First we must recognize that God is unlike humans in thinking, knowledge, and power and we can not understand everything he does, therefore there is no way of knowing why God would create anything.CoffeeCream wrote:1. God is omniscient. Ok if that's true then why did he create Satan knowing that he would one day rebel? Doesn't that mean that God indirectly created evil? Then how could He be considered a good God. Also why did he allow for man to eat the apple? That seems a little cruel to me - sort of like teasing a child into doing something that's bad for them.
God has preformed miracles; the Bible is filled with them, and he did come for about 32 years as the man Jesus. Also God wants us to believe because we have faith and trust, not because he bribes us by preforming miracles on a regular basis. The reason that God does not end wars, crime, disease and evil is because he gave Humans a unique gift: the gift of free will. God could easily be a controlling dictator but he wants us to learn from our mistakes and learn to love each other by our own free will, not because he forces us like mindless robots.CoffeeCream wrote:2. If God is all powerful then why doesn't he just show himself to everyone? Either that or perform some miracle which would prove to everyone once and for all that he is actually interested in us. I think he exists by the way, but Christians tell us that he loves us. Why doesn't he get involved in all the wars here and put an end to them all? I don't think anyone can prove that this supreme being is really directly interested in our affairs.
Some Christians believe it is their duty to make a Christian state that is based on Biblical and moral laws. on the contrary I believe a Christian state is the opposite of what God wants, as he would rather make the choice to follow him and his laws a free choice, not an obligatory decision.CoffeeCream wrote:3. Since Christians believe in free will, then why do they constantly want to legislate morality? Shouldn't people be free to do pretty much what they want as long as it conforms to the law or aren't killing anyone?
God wants everyone to go to heaven and all it takes is a genuine faith to enter. Jesus sacrificed himself so everyone could go th heaven and all he asks for is faith, if you can not give that small token of recognition, you can not enter. Also God is not unjust for sending people to hell as he gave them a whole life time to have faith in him.CoffeeCream wrote:4. From what I'm reading on here it sounds like that someone can live the absolute worst life but then 'accept' Jesus (whatever that means) and still go to heaven (wherever that is). On the flip side, someone can live the absolute best life but not 'accept' Jesus and still go to hell. Huh!!! Oh yeah, and how can a loving God send someone to hell in the first place?

Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Well, I dont think Jesus's sacrifice worked. More people are not religious now then probably ever before. Also, its not a small token of recognition, its a lifetime of devotion to a religion, which takes a lot of work and effort and time.God wants everyone to go to heaven and all it takes is a genuine faith to enter. Jesus sacrificed himself so everyone could go th heaven and all he asks for is faith, if you can not give that small token of recognition, you can not enter. Also God is not unjust for sending people to hell as he gave them a whole life time to have faith in him.
I completely agree. A lot of the stories and "miracles" were just lessons and stories which had a deeper meaning. Like how parents tell children stories which arnt necessarily factually true, but teach them a lesson.frogger4 wrote:Has anyone ever thought of the concept that parts of the Bible might actually be symbolic, rather than absolute fact? You may believe what you like, but perhaps look at things logically. If you trace the genealogy in the bible back to Adam and Eve, the earth apparently is about 5 thousand to 6 thousand years old. Using science (Carbon-14 dating and other radioactive materials), it has been concluded that the earth is considerably older than a few thousand years, closer to 4.5 billion years, if that is what you choose to believe. Using that as just one example, the Adam and Eve story was probably not completely factual, more symbolic of lessons that people wanted to get across.
Is gravity still classed as a theory?frogger4 wrote: Evolution: The theory is that when cells reproduce, all of their DNA must be copied and transferred to the daughter cell. On occasion, there is a slight error when the DNA gets copied, referred to as a mutation. Most of the time, when a mutation occurs, the cell will die because it will not be able to function properly without that exact DNA. Very rarely though, that mutation actually helps the cell in one way or another (as a broad example, wouldn't it sometimes be helpful to have a third hand?). When this mutation is actually beneficial and the mutant lives to reproduce, a new species is born. I won't go into Darwinism because someone else probably knows more than I on that subject.
Just a joke, evolution is just a theory just like how gravity is just a theory.
note: I actually am a Christian, I just happen to have fairly liberal views.
BOLD:i meant comparatively speaking, it is not easy to believe but is a whole lot easier than being punished for everyones sins that you did not commit. Also God would love to have you follow him for your entire life but he does not require it because he knows that people will fall away but he still accepted them into heaven and he will not go back on his word to allow them in.Titanic wrote:Well, I dont think Jesus's sacrifice worked. More people are not religious now then probably ever before. Also, its not a small token of recognition, its a lifetime of devotion to a religion, which takes a lot of work and effort and time.God wants everyone to go to heaven and all it takes is a genuine faith to enter. Jesus sacrificed himself so everyone could go th heaven and all he asks for is faith, if you can not give that small token of recognition, you can not enter. Also God is not unjust for sending people to hell as he gave them a whole life time to have faith in him.
Also, a question to those who believe in Heaven and hell, what happens to a baby which dies when it is a matter of days or weeks or even hours old? Surely it cannot be judged to be good or evil because it has not had the time to prove itself either way.
Finally, I'll just like to say I do not belive in Christianity or any of the Abrahamic religion at all, because they are just stories which were passed around imo. Look up the god Mithras, his story is scarily similar to Jesus's , and so are many others. I do not beleive in Heaven and Hell because I just dont think you can split the world into good people and bad people. People have parts of both, and if this was so heaven would have many people who have bad parts to them, and hell will have a lot of people who can be very kinf and forgiving.

But surely thats the main reason why people go to hell, for not believing or following his messages.magneticgoop wrote:BOLD:i meant comparatively speaking, it is not easy to believe but is a whole lot easier than being punished for everyones sins that you did not commit. Also God would love to have you follow him for your entire life but he does not require it because he knows that people will fall away but he still accepted them into heaven and he will not go back on his word to allow them in.Titanic wrote:Well, I dont think Jesus's sacrifice worked. More people are not religious now then probably ever before. Also, its not a small token of recognition, its a lifetime of devotion to a religion, which takes a lot of work and effort and time.God wants everyone to go to heaven and all it takes is a genuine faith to enter. Jesus sacrificed himself so everyone could go th heaven and all he asks for is faith, if you can not give that small token of recognition, you can not enter. Also God is not unjust for sending people to hell as he gave them a whole life time to have faith in him.
Also, a question to those who believe in Heaven and hell, what happens to a baby which dies when it is a matter of days or weeks or even hours old? Surely it cannot be judged to be good or evil because it has not had the time to prove itself either way.
Finally, I'll just like to say I do not belive in Christianity or any of the Abrahamic religion at all, because they are just stories which were passed around imo. Look up the god Mithras, his story is scarily similar to Jesus's , and so are many others. I do not beleive in Heaven and Hell because I just dont think you can split the world into good people and bad people. People have parts of both, and if this was so heaven would have many people who have bad parts to them, and hell will have a lot of people who can be very kinf and forgiving.
they go to heaven as they were not old enough to recognized that they have sinned, and therefore could not accept and believe the message of Christ
Several parts are, particularly the prophecy, psalms, proverbs and parables but I see no reason not to believe them as a all powerful God could make miracles and supernatural eventsfrogger4 wrote:Has anyone ever thought of the concept that parts of the Bible might actually be symbolic, rather than absolute fact?
go to Creation vs. evolution threadfrogger4 wrote: You may believe what you like, but perhaps look at things logically. If you trace the genealogy in the bible back to Adam and Eve, the earth apparently is about 5 thousand to 6 thousand years old. Using science (Carbon-14 dating and other radioactive materials), it has been concluded that the earth is considerably older than a few thousand years, closer to 4.5 billion years, if that is what you choose to believe. Using that as just one example, the Adam and Eve story was probably not completely factual, more symbolic of lessons that people wanted to get across.
Evolution: The theory is that when cells reproduce, all of their DNA must be copied and transferred to the daughter cell. On occasion, there is a slight error when the DNA gets copied, referred to as a mutation. Most of the time, when a mutation occurs, the cell will die because it will not be able to function properly without that exact DNA. Very rarely though, that mutation actually helps the cell in one way or another (as a broad example, wouldn't it sometimes be helpful to have a third hand?). When this mutation is actually beneficial and the mutant lives to reproduce, a new species is born. I won't go into Darwinism because someone else probably knows more than I on that subject.
Just a joke, evolution is just a theory just like how gravity is just a theory.
note: I actually am a Christian, I just happen to have fairly liberal views.

first of all MG I have to disagree, I think everything God does is based in logically and humans have the capacity to comprehend it.CoffeeCream wrote:1. God is omniscient. Ok if that's true then why did he create Satan knowing that he would one day rebel? Doesn't that mean that God indirectly created evil? Then how could He be considered a good God. Also why did he allow for man to eat the apple? That seems a little cruel to me - sort of like teasing a child into doing something that's bad for them.
God is no longer all powerful, his power is limited as the world has been consumed by sin and majority-ruled by Satan. He wishes he could help us and clear all of our problems but he can't.CoffeeCream wrote:2. If God is all powerful then why doesn't he just show himself to everyone? Either that or perform some miracle which would prove to everyone once and for all that he is actually interested in us. I think he exists by the way, but Christians tell us that he loves us. Why doesn't he get involved in all the wars here and put an end to them all? I don't think anyone can prove that this supreme being is really directly interested in our affairs.
Yes many christians have it the wrong way, no one can be forced to "do good" they have to make the decision themselves. Christians are on the right track but don't have it exact.CoffeeCream wrote:3. Since Christians believe in free will, then why do they constantly want to legislate morality? Shouldn't people be free to do pretty much what they want as long as it conforms to the law or aren't killing anyone?
Yes the first part is possible because not everyone knows about God from birth, and they sin in ignorance. The second part is not possible, I think you can still go to heaven without knowledge of God. (though not accepting him is a sketchy subject for me...)CoffeeCream wrote:4. From what I'm reading on here it sounds like that someone can live the absolute worst life but then 'accept' Jesus (whatever that means) and still go to heaven (wherever that is). On the flip side, someone can live the absolute best life but not 'accept' Jesus and still go to hell. Huh!!! Oh yeah, and how can a loving God send someone to hell in the first place?
I heard most go to a "middle ground" which is actually a low level of heaven, so they can be educated and such, since they still have ties to Satan.Titanic wrote:
Also, a question to those who believe in Heaven and hell, what happens to a baby which dies when it is a matter of days or weeks or even hours old? Surely it cannot be judged to be good or evil because it has not had the time to prove itself either way.
yes, everything in the bible is symbolic, everything. God did not create the universe in 7 days, rather 7 periods or stages. The stage(s) where he created the earth and the stages where he created life are far apart, obviously it takes some time to plan such complex things!frogger4 wrote:Has anyone ever thought of the concept that parts of the Bible might actually be symbolic, rather than absolute fact? You may believe what you like, but perhaps look at things logically. If you trace the genealogy in the bible back to Adam and Eve, the earth apparently is about 5 thousand to 6 thousand years old. Using science (Carbon-14 dating and other radioactive materials), it has been concluded that the earth is considerably older than a few thousand years, closer to 4.5 billion years, if that is what you choose to believe. Using that as just one example, the Adam and Eve story was probably not completely factual, more symbolic of lessons that people wanted to get across.
i see you points here and i have already stated my views but the god you are speaking of is not the all knowing, all powerful God of Christianity and therefore is obviously wrong in my opinonstatic_ice wrote:I am not in the JF and I do not attribute my views to general christianity; basically don't take my answer as "THE" christian answer. Naturally, in spite of this, I have some things I disagree with magneticgoop over.
first of all MG I have to disagree, I think everything God does is based in logically and humans have the capacity to comprehend it.CoffeeCream wrote:1. God is omniscient. Ok if that's true then why did he create Satan knowing that he would one day rebel? Doesn't that mean that God indirectly created evil? Then how could He be considered a good God. Also why did he allow for man to eat the apple? That seems a little cruel to me - sort of like teasing a child into doing something that's bad for them.
Now Coffee Cream, He didn't know Satan would rebel, he can't see the future. God gave angels free will too. And he didn't create evil, good and evil had existed even before him, he just had the plan to ignore it. Because of this he didn't "allow" man to eat the apple. You see the apple is a symbol for the worst sin out there, adultery. So God didn't "allow" them to have sex, they had the organs from the start and all he could do was warn them not to use them until they were ready. And adam and ever were not full grown adults, actually they were around 16-20. Its sad because they only needed to wait a few years until they were mature enough.
God is no longer all powerful, his power is limited as the world has been consumed by sin and majority-ruled by Satan. He wishes he could help us and clear all of our problems but he can't.CoffeeCream wrote:2. If God is all powerful then why doesn't he just show himself to everyone? Either that or perform some miracle which would prove to everyone once and for all that he is actually interested in us. I think he exists by the way, but Christians tell us that he loves us. Why doesn't he get involved in all the wars here and put an end to them all? I don't think anyone can prove that this supreme being is really directly interested in our affairs.
Yes many christians have it the wrong way, no one can be forced to "do good" they have to make the decision themselves. Christians are on the right track but don't have it exact.CoffeeCream wrote:3. Since Christians believe in free will, then why do they constantly want to legislate morality? Shouldn't people be free to do pretty much what they want as long as it conforms to the law or aren't killing anyone?
Yes the first part is possible because not everyone knows about God from birth, and they sin in ignorance. The second part is not possible, I think you can still go to heaven without knowledge of God. (though not accepting him is a sketchy subject for me...)CoffeeCream wrote:4. From what I'm reading on here it sounds like that someone can live the absolute worst life but then 'accept' Jesus (whatever that means) and still go to heaven (wherever that is). On the flip side, someone can live the absolute best life but not 'accept' Jesus and still go to hell. Huh!!! Oh yeah, and how can a loving God send someone to hell in the first place?
and God doesn't "send" people to hell, he wants to "bring" as many people as he can to heaven. But he is not allowed to bring people that Satan has a decent grasp on. When someone goes to Hell, they aren't pushed, they are pulled.
Again, in the above post, when I say confirming words like "this is" or "this isn't" I don't mean to dismiss all of the previous talk I'm just too lazy to put "I believe" in front of every sentence

well in my opinion, the all powerful God of Christianity is wrongmagneticgoop wrote:i see you points here and i have already stated my views but the god you are speaking of is not the all knowing, all powerful God of Christianity and therefore is obviously wrong in my opinon
the difference between my opinion and yours is mine is rightstatic_ice wrote:well in my opinion, the all powerful God of Christianity is wrongmagneticgoop wrote:i see you points here and i have already stated my views but the god you are speaking of is not the all knowing, all powerful God of Christianity and therefore is obviously wrong in my opinon

you're a great debatermagneticgoop wrote:the difference between my opinion and yours is mine is rightstatic_ice wrote:well in my opinion, the all powerful God of Christianity is wrongmagneticgoop wrote:i see you points here and i have already stated my views but the god you are speaking of is not the all knowing, all powerful God of Christianity and therefore is obviously wrong in my opinon
i know but back on topic is coffee around i want to hear his responsestatic_ice wrote:you're a great debatermagneticgoop wrote:the difference between my opinion and yours is mine is rightstatic_ice wrote:well in my opinion, the all powerful God of Christianity is wrongmagneticgoop wrote:i see you points here and i have already stated my views but the god you are speaking of is not the all knowing, all powerful God of Christianity and therefore is obviously wrong in my opinon

Well, if you're taking a world religions class, it would probably be helpful to know that Catholics do endorse evolution. And no, nature did not "magically" select species to survive and thrive, because nature has no will. Natural selection is a perfectly reasonable concept, however. You can't really deny that if something has unhelpful traits, it will die before it can reproduce. Multiply this process by 3 billion years (give or take) and I don't doubt that the result could be what we have today.CoffeeCream wrote:Nature just magically selected certain species to survive and thrive? No way! There's too many holes in the theories and nobody's been able to prove it. The people who believe in it are welcome to it, but they've been given enough time to produce the evidence and they never are able to. There's too much complexity and design in the world for me to deny that there is some type of supreme being or higher power.
He created the angels, but gave them free will so they may freely love him. He certainly knew the consequences this action would have, but apparently freely given love is more valuable to God than the pain which free will would cause.CoffeeCream wrote:1. God is omniscient. Ok if that's true then why did he create Satan knowing that he would one day rebel? Doesn't that mean that God indirectly created evil? Then how could He be considered a good God. Also why did he allow for man to eat the apple? That seems a little cruel to me - sort of like teasing a child into doing something that's bad for them.
Well, we believe that he did come down and show himself to everyone. That's what Jesus was all about. Dying for us certainly shows that he is interested in us.CoffeeCream wrote:2. If God is all powerful then why doesn't he just show himself to everyone? Either that or perform some miracle which would prove to everyone once and for all that he is actually interested in us. I think he exists by the way, but Christians tell us that he loves us. Why doesn't he get involved in all the wars here and put an end to them all? I don't think anyone can prove that this supreme being is really directly interested in our affairs.
The moral issue Christians are generally most associated with is that of abortion. And the thing is, we believe that abortion IS killing someone.CoffeeCream wrote: 3. Since Christians believe in free will, then why do they constantly want to legislate morality? Shouldn't people be free to do pretty much what they want as long as it conforms to the law or aren't killing anyone?
Whether or not you accept Jesus is of fundamental importance to salvation, because we believe that Jesus IS your salvation. However, the culpability of not accepting Jesus can be diminished by any number of things. Maybe the Christians in your life are jerks, and are thus driving you away from Christ more than drawing you to him. Or maybe you have legitimate, reasonable concerns about Christianity which are never addressed. Or maybe you just never heard the Good News in its truth.CoffeeCream wrote:4. From what I'm reading on here it sounds like that someone can live the absolute worst life but then 'accept' Jesus (whatever that means) and still go to heaven (wherever that is). On the flip side, someone can live the absolute best life but not 'accept' Jesus and still go to hell. Huh!!! Oh yeah, and how can a loving God send someone to hell in the first place?
Here's an interesting thing I'll pose to you.CoffeeCream wrote:My position is that there is some type of God or supreme being but it's impossible to personally know him as he stopped caring about us or is apathetic.
CoffeeCream wrote: 1. God is omniscient. Ok if that's true then why did he create Satan knowing that he would one day rebel? Doesn't that mean that God indirectly created evil? Then how could He be considered a good God. Also why did he allow for man to eat the apple? That seems a little cruel to me - sort of like teasing a child into doing something that's bad for them.
2. If God is all powerful then why doesn't he just show himself to everyone? Either that or perform some miracle which would prove to everyone once and for all that he is actually interested in us. I think he exists by the way, but Christians tell us that he loves us. Why doesn't he get involved in all the wars here and put an end to them all? I don't think anyone can prove that this supreme being is really directly interested in our affairs.
3. Since Christians believe in free will, then why do they constantly want to legislate morality? Shouldn't people be free to do pretty much what they want as long as it conforms to the law or aren't killing anyone?
4. From what I'm reading on here it sounds like that someone can live the absolute worst life but then 'accept' Jesus (whatever that means) and still go to heaven (wherever that is). On the flip side, someone can live the absolute best life but not 'accept' Jesus and still go to hell. Huh!!! Oh yeah, and how can a loving God send someone to hell in the first place?
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Why is God unlike humans? If we are created in his image then wouldn't it be logical to assume that we possess the same abilities to reason that it would be a bad thing to eat the fruit? There is also another problem that I can't understand with this. If your God is all knowing then he would know that Adam & Eve would sin.magneticgoop wrote:First we must recognize that God is unlike humans in thinking, knowledge, and power and we can not understand everything he does, therefore there is no way of knowing why God would create anything.
When God created Adam and Eve and both sinned they released evil into the world, but sin is not a creation it is a byproduct of disobedience to God. Perhaps the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil had a purpose that is not revealed. The Tree may have been for Adam and Eve when God said it was alright to eat the Fruit, but not until a later date. It may have been similar to a parent saying to their children "You can't have a cookie until i say it is OK," the kid will not understand why, but the parent has a purpose behind the restriction. You also must recognize the fact that
Adam and Eve were both grown Adults who have the will power to resist the temptation of eating the Fruit, unlike a child.
i thought he was the son of God. You're saying that Jesus is the same as God? That's a bit of a stretch I think considering he constantly called himself the son of God. Anyway, I'm interested in how you justify this so I'll listen.magneticgoop wrote:God has preformed miracles; the Bible is filled with them, and he did come for about 32 years as the man Jesus. Also God wants us to believe because we have faith and trust, not because he bribes us by preforming miracles on a regular basis.
and with this gift he has allowed people to misuse it in order to take advantage of each other. Would a loving God allow mankind to destroy themselves? Your point is intriguing about mindless robots. I certainly enjoy my free will, but I don't enjoy others abusing theirs. Sorry if that sounds a little bit arrogant, but I feel that way when i observe the news.magneticgoop wrote:The reason that God does not end wars, crime, disease and evil is because he gave Humans a unique gift: the gift of free will. God could easily be a controlling dictator but he wants us to learn from our mistakes and learn to love each other by our own free will, not because he forces us like mindless robots.
What about little kids who die? I don't think they even have the ability to understand things such as God, heaven, hell, and the whole bunch of doctrines. It seems like you're saying that they will go to hell and that God is justified in doing so. After all they never 'believed'. Perhaps you can explain this part further.magneticgoop wrote:God wants everyone to go to heaven and all it takes is a genuine faith to enter. Jesus sacrificed himself so everyone could go th heaven and all he asks for is faith, if you can not give that small token of recognition, you can not enter. Also God is not unjust for sending people to hell as he gave them a whole life time to have faith in him.