Moderator: Tournament Directors
kendoh99 wrote:Feathers V Vic
Singles (Feathers Players listed first)
Game 1 hammer1967 V Denne2315 770323
In Progress (NOTE: Denne2315 replaced by Tieryn)
Game 2 shadowdude V andyflint 770325
In Progress (NOTE: shadowdude replaced by Jmey)
Game 3 aeniko V Thekidstrumpet 770326
Won by Vic
Game 4 aerial attack V boshido_3 770327
In Progress (NOTE: boshido_3 replaced by andyflint)
Game 5 3hats V Tieryn 770329
In Progress
Game 6 demon666 V bandido 770331
In Progress
Game 7 3hats, aerial attack V Tieryn, thekidstrumpet 770332
In Progress
Game 8 aeniko, jmey V bandido, denne2315 770335
In Progress (NOTE: Denne2315 replaced by TheKidStrumpet)
Game 9 hammer1967, demon666 V gunsblazing, boshido_3 770336
In Progress (NOTE: boshido_3 replaced by andyflint, gunsblazing replaced by Bandido)
Game 10 3hats, hammer1967, demon666 V Tieryn, denne2315, andyflint 770337
In Progress (NOTE: Denne2315 replaced by Bandido)
Game 11 aerial attack, shadowdude, aeniko V thekidstrumpet, boshido_3,gunsblazing 770339
Waiting on Vic player(s) (NOTE: boshido_3 replaced by andyflint - guess this means Tieryn needs to join?)
kendoh99 wrote:Feathers V Vic
Singles (Feathers Players listed first)
Game 1 hammer1967 V Tieryn770323
Won by Vic
Game 2 shadowdude V andyflint 770325
In Progress (NOTE: shadowdude replaced by Jmey)
Game 3 aeniko V Thekidstrumpet 770326
Won by Vic
Game 4 aerial attack V boshido_3 770327
In Progress (NOTE: boshido_3 replaced by andyflint)
Game 5 3hats V Tieryn 770329
In Progress
Game 6 demon666 V bandido 770331
Won by Vic
Game 7 3hats, aerial attack V Tieryn, thekidstrumpet 770332
In Progress
Game 8 aeniko, jmey V bandido, denne2315 770335
In Progress (NOTE: Denne2315 replaced by TheKidStrumpet)
Game 9 hammer1967, demon666 V gunsblazing, boshido_3 770336
In Progress (NOTE: boshido_3 replaced by andyflint, gunsblazing replaced by Bandido)
Game 10 3hats, hammer1967, demon666 V Tieryn, denne2315, andyflint 770337
In Progress (NOTE: Denne2315 replaced by Bandido)
Game 11 aerial attack, shadowdude, aeniko V thekidstrumpet, boshido_3,gunsblazing 770339
Waiting on Vic player(s) (NOTE: boshido_3 replaced by andyflint - guess this means Tieryn needs to join?)
Spockers wrote:KLOBBER wrote:the Classic Map does not include any impenetrable borders at all
The classic map does have impenetrable borders. They are called oceans.
Lufsen75 wrote:Can I also replace teammembers in those games that are waiting?? I cant get contact with one of mine.
Aerial Attack wrote:Looks like the Vic absolutely smoked us feathers this time around. Although, they failed to actually field a ... TEAM
I definitely wanted to play my matches - just felt like the mojo wasn't there (actually it was - on the other team's side *lol*). There we go - I know what it was. I'm like a closer in baseball. Every game is like a tense 9th inning. Because it didn't seem like the Vic was going to field a team, I went out in the 8th inning of a blowout (just to get my innings in) and got creamed !!!
P.S. I have no idea why I'm posting this. It's not like we have a post-season, or that the winner is going to be determined on total games won. Maybe I'm just sour that I got/am getting smoked in all 3 of my matches?
Spockers wrote:KLOBBER wrote:the Classic Map does not include any impenetrable borders at all
The classic map does have impenetrable borders. They are called oceans.
Spockers wrote:KLOBBER wrote:the Classic Map does not include any impenetrable borders at all
The classic map does have impenetrable borders. They are called oceans.
Tieryn wrote:I think we, as a forum reading tournament playing populace should have a discussion/vote on this... I was a second round captain (my captain went on holidays, and still hasn't come back leaving me another player down) so I wasn't aware that it was only one player per set of games.
While I think the tourney should be about participation, in the long run, isn't it about the fun of playing the games and competing. I think you should be able to use players in multiple games if others don't show up. There's no fun in gaining points because your opposition didn't show up, and no contest in that.
It's so hard to get 8 people in the same place at the same time, let alone 16 (2 teams). It's like trying to herd a group of cats... there is no way they'll all walk in the same direction. What are other peoples opinions? I lost points last round because I didn't fill spots. This round I have, and we've won a few of those games, but I think it's better for the tournament, as we get to -play- the games rather than forfeit them.
Comments? Opinions? Flames?
Talk to my secretary
Tieryn wrote:Lufsen75 wrote:Can I also replace teammembers in those games that are waiting?? I cant get contact with one of mine.
I think we, as a forum reading tournament playing populace should have a discussion/vote on this... I was a second round captain (my captain went on holidays, and still hasn't come back leaving me another player down) so I wasn't aware that it was only one player per set of games.
While I think the tourney should be about participation, in the long run, isn't it about the fun of playing the games and competing. I think you should be able to use players in multiple games if others don't show up. There's no fun in gaining points because your opposition didn't show up, and no contest in that.
It's so hard to get 8 people in the same place at the same time, let alone 16 (2 teams). It's like trying to herd a group of cats... there is no way they'll all walk in the same direction. What are other peoples opinions? I lost points last round because I didn't fill spots. This round I have, and we've won a few of those games, but I think it's better for the tournament, as we get to -play- the games rather than forfeit them.
Comments? Opinions? Flames?
Talk to my secretary.
Oh, and on that note. The Vic is looking for 4 more players, (although at the risk of getting penalised for getting more people involved, I'm wary... That's another thing I think need talking. Punishment for trying to get more people involved...)
kendoh99 wrote:right guys.. theres quite a few posts here that i gotta go through
just gotta catch up on my games and will sort this out..
Spockers wrote:KLOBBER wrote:the Classic Map does not include any impenetrable borders at all
The classic map does have impenetrable borders. They are called oceans.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users