pyro55 ban (merged threads)

kwanton · Post by **kwanton** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:50 pm

wicked wrote:
UCAbears wrote:Can you really expect a kid, let alone anyone, have the time to take those turns?
If JohnnyRocket can do it, anyone can! so can Wacicha!

If he wasn't planning to play the turns, he shouldn't have signed up for them. And there is a statement in the current rules that states we'll take proactive measures to ensure fairplay.

So can kwanton. I had 143 active a couple weeks ago. I missed two turns out of all those games. They were all 1v1 by the way so it was a constant stream of turns. Not those pansy 5-6 player games.

treefiddy · Post by **treefiddy** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:50 pm

He obviously had time to play turns in the games he joined with you.

He elected to ignore all the other games, and join some games with you. Did he even attempt to play the other games?

spurgistan · Post by **spurgistan** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:51 pm

Well, we won't see pyro any more. Just because it's not in the rule book doesn't mean they're not against the spirit of the site, especially if he received a warning about the behavior.

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:51 pm

wicked wrote:
UCAbears wrote:Can you really expect a kid, let alone anyone, have the time to take those turns?
If JohnnyRocket can do it, anyone can! so can Wacicha!

If he wasn't planning to play the turns, he shouldn't have signed up for them. And there is a statement in the current rules that states we'll take proactive measures to ensure fairplay.

This was before the warning wicked. Your not getting it. He didn't join anymore games and not take turns in them. He was even taking turns in some of the other games that he joined earlier.

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:52 pm

dustn64 wrote:
UCAbears wrote:This was stupid. I'm leaving. Bye everybody. Yeah, I know. This is like the 10th thread I made about it. Well this time, its for real. I'll finish my games, but thats it. The way this site is being ran, it's ridiculous. Bye too all my friends and if you want look me up on facebook if you have it. I'm in all the facebook conquerclub groups and I've posted my name in all of them so you'll know who to add. Bye everybody and good luck with this.

This is my last post ever.

~UCA
Liar

Thumbs up.

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:53 pm

spurgistan wrote:Well, we won't see pyro any more. Just because it's not in the rule book doesn't mean they're not against the spirit of the site, especially if he received a warning about the behavior.

see general discussion if u want to know more. And actually know what your talking about.

Dmunster · Post by **Dmunster** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:56 pm

UCAbears wrote:
kwanton wrote:Meh. I find it amusing that he has made no attempt to deny that pyro was just doing this to get his score to 1 and help UCABears get his point score up.

Simtom did this but he was only banned from playing with his colluder(not a word but whatever)

And Lack can not get in trouble for this. CC is a privatey owned business. Lack can refuse service to anyone he wants. Pyro's ban was not based on ethnicity or sex or anything else of that sort. Pyro was banned for an action (or inaction depending on how you look at it) so Lack was well within his legal rights to deny service to pyro.
Like I said, we'll see.

Me thinks you be deserving of a ban as well. After all this behavior benefited you. Cheater.

s.xkitten · Post by **s.xkitten** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:58 pm

you know, i liked you...but if this is how you really are, i won't miss you...now leave before you post anything else that just makes you look stupid, and like a cheater, and go have fun somewhere else...you won't be missed, now f*ck Off

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:02 pm

Well, I'm sorry you feel that way kitten. Anyway. Dmunster. I don't even have anything to say to you.

kwanton · Post by **kwanton** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:05 pm

Well you have made no attempt to deny that you have been cheating. Do you admit to getting pyro to deadbeat his games then using his low score to up your own points?

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:08 pm

kwanton wrote:Well you have made no attempt to deny that you have been cheating. Do you admit to getting pyro to deadbeat his games then using his low score to up your own points?

No, I actually insisted that he doesn't do it so this crap wouldn't happen and just out of respect. And, he wanted to play and get his points back up again, so I thought I'd help him. But, you know thats cheating.

Dmunster · Post by **Dmunster** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:14 pm

Cheater wrote:Well, I'm sorry you feel that way kitten. Anyway. Dmunster. I don't even have anything to say to you.

OKay, cheater.

Cheater wrote:No, I actually insisted that he doesn't do it so this crap wouldn't happen and just out of respect. And, he wanted to play and get his points back up again, so I thought I'd help him. But, you know thats cheating.

Yeah, sure, cheater.

s.xkitten · Post by **s.xkitten** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:14 pm

its the fact that you continue to defend him...what he did was wrong, no matter whether or not the rules specifically state it...and yet you keep defending his actions...he pretty much ruined the game for a lot of people, and thats not right, no matter what the rules state...its just common sense...

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:18 pm

s.xkitten wrote:its the fact that you continue to defend him...what he did was wrong, no matter whether or not the rules specifically state it...and yet you keep defending his actions...he pretty much ruined the game for a lot of people, and thats not right, no matter what the rules state...its just common sense...

I'm done arguing. Good luck everyone.

kwanton · Post by **kwanton** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:19 pm

UCAbears wrote:
s.xkitten wrote:its the fact that you continue to defend him...what he did was wrong, no matter whether or not the rules specifically state it...and yet you keep defending his actions...he pretty much ruined the game for a lot of people, and thats not right, no matter what the rules state...its just common sense...

I'm done arguing. Good luck everyone.

Yeah you said you were done posting too....

dustn64 · Post by **dustn64** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:19 pm

s.xkitten wrote:its the fact that you continue to defend him...what he did was wrong, no matter whether or not the rules specifically state it...and yet you keep defending his actions...he pretty much ruined the game for a lot of people, and thats not right, no matter what the rules state...its just common sense...

congrats on having 6000

sorry, back on topic

s.xkitten · Post by **s.xkitten** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:21 pm

what a fucking waste of my 6000th post...

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:25 pm

UCA, you're the only one who's not getting it. He was warned to start playing his games. He didn't, so he's gone.

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:29 pm

s.xkitten wrote:you know, i liked you...but if this is how you really are, i won't miss you...now leave before you post anything else that just makes you look stupid, and like a cheater, and go have fun somewhere else...you won't be missed, now f*ck Off

he already has. see the talk about anything thread, thread. oh, and UCA- i haven't seen you around much but i will really miss your "leaving" "permanently" and i don't think i'll "see" you again "soon" so "good-bye" "forever" [insert air quotes when " appears)

vtmarik · Post by **vtmarik** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:31 pm

Ok, bye.

CBlake · Post by **CBlake** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:38 pm

Guys this is tearing us apart

CBlake · Post by **CBlake** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:43 pm

uca wasnt playing doubles with pyro just to get his score up bc they play doubles all the time and uca played doubles with him when he sucked and they lost alot and he stilled played with him because they are friends....trust me uca could care less about his score...

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:48 pm

Not really CBlake...

Do you think he should've been banned?
Yes
84% [ 21 ]
No
16% [ 4 ]

s.xkitten · Post by **s.xkitten** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:49 pm

its couldn't care less...

if he could care less, that means he cares some, which is not what you were trying to stay...

when you try to defend your cheater friend, at least get the grammar right...

any chance you're leaving too?

CBlake · Post by **CBlake** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:58 pm

s.xkitten wrote:its couldn't care less...

if he could care less, that means he cares some, which is not what you were trying to stay...

when you try to defend your cheater friend, at least get the grammar right...

any chance you're leaving too?

I didnt say pyro didnt cheat i just said uca didnt take advantage of pyros score they have been playing doubles forever

pyro55 ban (merged threads)

Do you think he should've been banned?

Re: The pyro ban.