Deadbeating: Pyro55 [banned]

Post by **TeeGee** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:00 am

These are suspected deliberate deadbeater

Suspect users: pyro55

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=597257
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?p ... er1=pyro55

Comments: He/she is still joining games and apart from the occaisional 2 player game looks to be deadbeating in all of them

TeeGee

gimil · Post by **gimil** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:04 am

Put them on your ignore list

Post by **TeeGee** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:39 am

gimil wrote:Put them on your ignore list

No shit shirlock

Just letting others who might not be aware know

lackattack · Post by **lackattack** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:16 am

I sent a warning to pyro55 to stop immediately.

As I've mentioned before, even though it does not violate rule #1 or rule #2, intentional deadbeating is a gross abuse of the game and of this website. We don't need to explicitly set rules for things that common sense would tell you should not be tolerated, such as hacking the server.

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:21 am

its better late than never, but I believe I saw him making moves. Nothing like cashing in on 3 rounds of troops.

Post by **TeeGee** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:05 am

Thanks lack.

Pyro55 has started taking turns in some games. I think he has joined a few too many to keep up with though

Ronaldinho · Post by **Ronaldinho** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:36 am

lackattack wrote: such as hacking the server.

ruin my plans big man

b.k. barunt · Post by **b.k. barunt** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 1:10 pm

lackattack wrote:I sent a warning to pyro55 to stop immediately.

As I've mentioned before, even though it does not violate rule #1 or rule #2, intentional deadbeating is a gross abuse of the game and of this website. We don't need to explicitly set rules for things that common sense would tell you should not be tolerated, such as hacking the server.

A warning? If someone looks like they might be deadbeating intentionally in three or four games, you send them a warning. When they join 100 games, and deadbeat in all of them, a "warning" seems rather ludicrous. But wait! Maybe you know a secret that we don't - why not send warning to Osama, and so avert any future terrorist attacks. Brilliant!

Unit_2 · Post by **Unit_2** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 1:36 pm

Lack, you should add that to the rules.

lackattack · Post by **lackattack** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:42 pm

Unit_2, we will be updating the rules in the next update but for now common sense should suffice.

b.k. barunt, except for emergencies we feel it's best to warn before you shoot. Since this was reported on the 11th I think giving it an extra day is reasonable in order to resolving this without resorting to violence. Of course, you are 100% right we were slow to respond. Better late than never. And better to do things correctly than hastily. No?

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:11 pm

just an fyi

Lack kinda already did take precautions to prevent this. He put a limit on how many games you can start/join at a given time.....which is 50. Perhaps Pyro joined alot of games as the last player to begin the game our you are incorrect that he did this to 100 games ? Either way Pyro was wrong and we all learned and adjusted accordingly. Pyro was punished with about 15 negative feedbacks which of course he deserved.

LetGodSortThem · Post by **LetGodSortThem** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:11 pm

........

b.k. barunt · Post by **b.k. barunt** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:12 pm

No - if this isn't an "emergency", i don't know what is.

LetGodSortThem · Post by **LetGodSortThem** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:17 pm

TeeGee thanks for the heads up...keep posting these cheats...Added to my ignore as well...and I bet others...

b.k. barunt · Post by **b.k. barunt** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:12 pm

Since this isn't flame wars, i'll refrain from properly responding to this weak bit of trolling from my most determined (if not too bright) stalker.

dice66111 · Post by **dice66111** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:05 am

what is even the point of this guy playin he has no points?

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=621363

SirSebstar · Post by **SirSebstar** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:07 am

your winstatistic?

b.k. barunt · Post by **b.k. barunt** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:11 am

Or, in misssebstar's case - whinestatistic.

bob72 · Post by **bob72** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:19 am

sadly my account "babysitter" signed up for about 10 matches with him in doubles and triples

bye bye pts. Good job i'm playing this for fun or else i'd have a gold ? next to my name...

PhatJoey · Post by **PhatJoey** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:04 am

I think they are one and the same. ;O)

Awesome · Post by **Awesome** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:53 pm

ok seriously, he deserves more than just a warning. He is still joining games, and still deadbeating in them.
He pretty much joins team games exclusively. Thus giving practically no chance for his teammates.
His negative feedback is up to 62.
He has a score of 1, with 382 losses, I'm assuming most of these are from deadbeats.
It's one thing to just lose a game because of this guy. It just pisses me off how much it drags out the game. Waiting 24 hours every time it gets to his turn, I just want to be able to join another game! (I don't have premium)

If he would only start playing in the game I have with him. (It is currently his turn, as it has been for the past 20 hours, I think he will finally get kicked this turn. Thank God!) maybe I would take some of this back.

He's still going on my ignore list though.

treefiddy · Post by **treefiddy** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 7:23 pm

If there's a way to ban Pyro55 from team games, I do think that would be the best solution if he isn't banned.

He just joined a bunch of games with UCABears (the only person who wanted to defend this guy in this thread).

What this basically amounts to is Pyro's manipulated low score will now keep UCABears from losing as many points if they lose, and he now stands to gain more points if they happen to win.

So of course UCABears was defending him; he has tons to gain from Pyro55 screwing over a lot of other players.

AAFitz · Post by **AAFitz** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 7:52 pm

actually, the last time someone did that, they got blocked from playing together...it was simtom and whoever his partner was

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:00 pm

AAFitz wrote:actually, the last time someone did that, they got blocked from playing together...it was simtom and whoever his partner was

PassIsPaws.

And say, Fitz, what's with all the short posts lately? Busy writing a novel somewhere else?

AAFitz · Post by **AAFitz** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:25 pm

The1exile wrote:
AAFitz wrote:actually, the last time someone did that, they got blocked from playing together...it was simtom and whoever his partner was
PassIsPaws.

And say, Fitz, what's with all the short posts lately? Busy writing a novel somewhere else?

glad you picked up that quote, figured someone would...it just fit the guy so perfect...never saw anything like it...

Deadbeating: Pyro55 [banned]

Deadbeating: Pyro55 [banned]

Pyro? or Johnnyrocket?