Hjelp’s Day 1 is three cuts.. (Nauls is our cook afterall):
First cut: silence. Opening days he flew under the radar. Almost nothing on the table, no suspect, no case. Just present enough not to be replaced. (Claimed "to be travelling" later).
Second cut: the wagons. Once his name was up as a possible Thing, the quiet ended immediatly and the jumping started.. Traf first, then onto me once votes were already there, “I call your hand,” then off Traf again when the wagon moved. No theory under it. Calling a hand is not a reason. And I was not dodging the BT. I had already said test one of Charle, Traf, or me. The phrase "calling you hand" only works if nobody checks the order. In short : Be on the wagon, as long as the wagon is not on him. Any wagon will do. Panic galore..
Third cut: the reasoning, and only then. When confronted his boarding passes on all those wagons had no valid theory, "The old-player" case and the "30 Sep numbers" and "It's Charle" showed up.
Like he already knew in the second cut who the Things are, so he did not need to spend time on that search.. Some of the third cut theory is decent yes. It is also way too late. Because it only arrived when confronted he had no search theories on the Things. Only then he started to think on that. Again like he never had the need to do so before?
Then for Dessert: He pleas random numbers 2/9 on every seat, but then prefers Charles anyway. .
A Charle he claims he suspects the most but never voted for BT.Ofc i could be wrong but boy, if we let all this slip, and we do not lynch Hjelp - just how stupid as a science team are we?
on the kitchen table it reads
