Debate here if you doubt Jesus is the Creator of the universe born in flesh

[jimboston]

YES, All is well with me. THANKS..!

And what do you use? At least I use facts, prove it, and do not make assumptions.

And I have travelled, outside of my state. Have you?

I do things to help others. Do you?

Ahhh….helping others by cutting & pasting Wiki and AI quotes. Got it.

[Apatheist]

YES, All is well with me. THANKS..!

And what do you use? At least I use facts, prove it, and do not make assumptions.

And I have travelled, outside of my state. Have you?

I do things to help others. Do you?

Ahhh….helping others by cutting & pasting Wiki and AI quotes. Got it.

You seem to misunderstand the AI quotes thing.
All the Google AI is doing is organising the search results. Follow the links and you'll see the paragraph that it has copied - it's exactly the same result as googling it for yourself, it's just a step shorter. It's not the same as asking AI questions that it can get wrong (and often does, particularly the freebie versions).
If you wish to refute any such quotes, do your own search and see what comes back - if it's a different answer from a reliable source, post it.
You've lost some credibility points with your assumption about me being a former banned poster (which I'm not), so you need to take some steps down from the moral high ground.

[jimboston]

YES, All is well with me. THANKS..!

And what do you use? At least I use facts, prove it, and do not make assumptions.

And I have travelled, outside of my state. Have you?

I do things to help others. Do you?

Ahhh….helping others by cutting & pasting Wiki and AI quotes. Got it.

You seem to misunderstand the AI quotes thing.
All the Google AI is doing is organising the search results. Follow the links and you'll see the paragraph that it has copied - it's exactly the same result as googling it for yourself, it's just a step shorter. It's not the same as asking AI questions that it can get wrong (and often does, particularly the freebie versions).
If you wish to refute any such quotes, do your own search and see what comes back - if it's a different answer from a reliable source, post it.
You've lost some credibility points with your assumption about me being a former banned poster (which I'm not), so you need to take some steps down from the moral high ground.

I fully understand how Google AI summary works. I find it to be generally reliable, though not 100%.

I’m not refuting any of the info or data the idiot cuts & pastes… the point is that his sole form of argument/communication is searching on AI or Wiki. He rarely adds anything of value. If I wanted to research a topic I’d just go do that on my own, I don’t need to come to a web forum to read what someone has cut&pasted from Wiki. I like to chat and discuss topics with people who form their own thoughts. Sometimes these comments can be supported by links or sources but when 95% of what someone posts is cut&paste from Google or Wiki I’ll take a hard pass.

Regarding your whole “credibility points”… I’m still not convinced you aren’t mrswdk or some former forum troll. So maybe you need the credibility points not me. My post that was in reference to was pretty obviously sarcasm… I don’t think all sarcastic comments should be followed by a ‘wink’… kinda ruins the joke IMHO.