Apatheist wrote: Sun Jan 11, 2026 3:22 pm
I agree, it's unreasonable to ban someone for rule-breaking without telling them why and for how long. Two questions - not suggestions or proposals by any means: 1) Should bans be made public, so that people can educate themselves on what is or isn't acceptable? I don't know whether name and shame would have a positive effect or not.
2) Is there a threshold of X bans in a T time period that leads to more severe punishment? If so, the information should perhaps include the relevant count so the transgressor knows exactly where they stand.
If I recall, there is an escalation scale they use in the forums, unless they go nuclear on you and go for a year or more (first hand knowledge). Days, Weeks, Months, for repeat infractions. However, with the forum bans, I was always informed of the transgression and the reasoning behind it. At that point, you can appeal your ban through the appropriate channels. That is one of my biggest issues with how the chat team works. What is there to appeal? What was the actual rule broken? What is the history with the mod that did it? Is it the same mod that handed down a ban out of the ether on a night I wasn't even in chat "having fun," but was actually just conversing with CC friends?
There just needs to be some sort of clarity and process that can be appealed. Asking someone to not do something that is then clearly stated is not against the rules, and then banning them for not heading your puritanical requests, is ridiculous. Plenty is said in the forums and within chat and on my own wall that I do not agree with. Go look at my wall right now, spammed up with religious protestations from a user that I actually enjoy bantering with! Do I agree with it? Is it crossing some sort of ban threshold? I don't think so. And my man can say whatever he wants.
Anyway, I thought this was already in place as I had received chat bans before in the long ago past. Why did it stop and what is the process now?
the black jesus has spoken...-Jesus noir