Black Metal Mafia - D2

[Charle]

I don't understand what is going on at the moment, but can we try and get some logical posts of who we think might be guilty?

There is not much to work with if we are not staying with the topic.

[SoN!c]

I don't understand what is going on at the moment, but can we try and get some logical posts of who we think might be guilty?

There is not much to work with if we are not staying with the topic.

That is exactly the point Charle. There is nothing to work with here.

Players that are not comitted in here or babbling barzouk nonsense should be lynched.

[strike wolf]

Screw it. Unvote Vote jfm. I think that JFM is on the wrong track with Son!c but I'm not convinced that makes him scum or Son!c town. Frankly it just sounds like Ragian warned Son!c in PM because Son!c realized his error and apologized in PM (and also one post edit where Son!c immediately apologized is less significant than Charle quoting a portion of his PM in thread). So in my eyes, Son!c being warned via PM isnt really that alignment indicative. Of the two, JFM being somewhat hypocritical and contradictory is more of a red flag.

[Loose Canon]

I think it benefits town to work in some sort of a systemized framework way for lynching.
Particularly when there is as there seems to be at the moment no strong evidence against any player, (and there might never be).
Even though town players particularly those with powers and those with particular suspicions will want to and might justifiably deviate from this.

Early indicative votes seems to have some support.

I am going to re-propose that in the absence of a jailkeeper or a detective (if any) having come forward that Charle nominates one player X for lynching.
(it may be Sonic or Charle may change his mind)
Player X then nominates a second player Y as an alternative for lynching.
We then all argue back and forth as to lynch X, Y or indeed No Lynch.

I don't want to force a claim, although it may be that as a last resort a player on the verge of being lynched might feel their hand is forced.
I do want vote pressure to be applied to see what if anything falls out of it.
Other players may well emerge as more suspicious in the course of the arguing.


And if players don't like this idea I do think they should argue against it.
Maybe now , or maybe as it is tried.

But I do think starting in a systemized way for lynching today is the best course - at least for now.

Arguers????

[jfm10]

unvote sonic
vote kongming3

[Loose Canon]

Well I'm still going to push the case for sonic being scum a bit more.

Each townie may be right or wrong about their suspicions but at least their suspicions come from an honest place.

The one thing scum HAVE to falsify is any suspicion they have on other players.

I've not seen sonic openly post any real suspicions, I've seen deflection onto flavour and other stuff where sonic can genuinely claim innocence.
I've seen go on vote for me if you think I'm guilty. I've seen sonic point to other players suspicions, and I've seen hints at other players playing suspiciously from sonic.

I'm gonna say it, not only do I think sonic is most likely to be scum on what evidence I see so far, but worse than that sonic is playing timidly whether town or scum.
To me in this game sonic is NO ROCKSTAR