Moderator: Community Team
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Extreme Ways wrote:Btw considering this is
1) Sonic
2) "extreme role madness"
3) Sonic
4) batshit crazy
5) setup info in flavour
I assume this is a bastard setup. It might be multiball, but I expect at least a third party.
Extreme Ways wrote:Btw considering this is
1) Sonic
2) "extreme role madness"
3) Sonic
4) batshit crazy
5) setup info in flavour
I assume this is a bastard setup. It might be multiball, but I expect at least a third party.
Devante wrote:This is nonsense. If he really dug up this story, assuming LCs post has merit, then kudos to the man for taking that old story and trying it out for mafia. If anyone knows mine and sonics history my compliments don't come easy there but only when deserved. And in this case so far they are.
Gonna play this a bit different and try to analyze and be more involved RL permitting so letās skip the bullshit and get this bitch rollin. Iāll start
Unvote
We gotta a count to find and his minions. Letās get to it
Extreme Ways wrote:Helpful EW is scum EW
which gives me a pass to be totally helpless (wording intended) this game while you figure out the flavour hints
pmchugh wrote:Extreme Ways wrote:Helpful EW is scum EW
which gives me a pass to be totally helpless (wording intended) this game while you figure out the flavour hints
I hearby revoke this meta. EW is allowed to be helpful without appearing scummy.
Although I agree with rag, I am not a fan of flavour reading generally because it's easy for scum to engage with it without any fear of slipping up because its abstracted from the players, its just reading the mod, which no players know. In this game the mod seems to be encouraging it and actually giving us info that might be relevant so I will let people away with it for now, but none of it counts as reading players which is the most townie activity that exists.
kongming3 wrote:Vampire is a mason/mason becomes a vampire once dead?
Charle wrote:I really liked EW's post of why town needs to lynch someone on D1 in the previous game (the fact that if you do not lynch, you hand the first move over to scum at Night 1). Having said this, in that game EW was scum, so EW this is to you now, do you still think this theory is good for this game?
pmchugh wrote:Although I agree with rag, I am not a fan of flavour reading generally because it's easy for scum to engage with it without any fear of slipping up because its abstracted from the players, its just reading the mod, which no players know. In this game the mod seems to be encouraging it and actually giving us info that might be relevant so I will let people away with it for now, but none of it counts as reading players which is the most townie activity that exists.
SoN!c wrote: (unvote has to be in Red, not Orange, im sorry but if i allow it then Ragian will vote / unvote in Pink)
Ragian wrote:SoN!c wrote: (unvote has to be in Red, not Orange, im sorry but if i allow it then Ragian will vote / unvote in Pink)
Curses! He is on to me.
Finally an unfounded FoS from Vot. I've missed that I'll repeat it for you: it "opens up for the possibility that baddies can hide behind flavour analysis to appear helpful." At no point am I against flavour analysis in a game such as this. That would be dumb. Pretending that PMC and I have said that is also dumb.
Ragian wrote::roll:
Obviously, it makes sense to point that out to people who haven't played flavour games before. Obviously, scum can't hide behind anything (not even in italics). Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
How I caught on to you in The Thing, too. It's nice to see that you're doing the exact same thing here. Are you scum in this game, Votanic?
Ragian: I would never imply that Flavour Anaysis is scummy, (...I have repeatedly implied that very thing in every post where I say I do not.)
Ragian wrote:Unfounded FoS. Check.
Ignoring question based on meta. Check.
Keep digging.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users