Craig25 wrote:I just re-read this and, I am going to point out a few errors you have made:
1. You are just making up Random stuff about Maps and calling them facts. Trafalaxy and Trafalgar have 11.74 and 12.29 Average Round Lengths on specifically Super League Settings. Calculated over 685 Games
So stop making up stuff and claiming it as fact. It is a serious issue you have.
They are the same map. The only way that they are different is your sample size has delivered a 0.65 round difference because of variance, not because there is only reason why they would play differently. I also fact-checked Sonic and found the Trafalaxy map creation thread. They are the same map, just with different artwork. This is a fact.
2. 'There should be an overview of maps that are banned' - There is you moron! For all to see! It;s got the stats from Circa 115,000 Super LEague Games on it.
Let me explain how your 'overview' works. A map is delivered on a random map one out of every 255 times. Which means we MIGHT get four or five of each banned map added to the sample size. This is NOT enough to change any of the average round length amounts. What we should be doing as a League is whenever a banned map comes up one of us should deadbeat. Suddenly we have a load of unbanned maps... Huzzah?
3. 'I know Craig isn’t keen on votes to challenge his ego but attracting more players should be the goal no?' Over 12 Round Average Length was voted on by the Players. Along with lots of other Rules in the Super League. You would know that if you had been in it long enough. But it appears you have just turned up and played a couple of Seasons and think your the expert
- Crazy as a Coconut springs to mind.
I don't think the format is a problem. I love the idea of this league or I wouldn't be in it. What I don't like is your lack of respect for what could legitimately be a good idea and consider it rather than shut it down because you can.
I have identified two main issues which you do not address as your rhetoric only involves shouting around 150,000 games. I have never once said this wasn't an impressive thing, but like how many of even the veterans of the Super League have argued with you in the past and you continue to shut them down through pure arrogance
(Everyone should see Super League Season 11 for a VERY interesting discussion where Craig shuts down Clanlord Carl for no f*cking reason at all. Same shit as you can see in this thread).
Any reader will find more Craig nonsense if you would just look at every time anyone dares mention flat rate or adjacent. Christ. I'm not even trying to change that, just getting Craig to try and review the banned maps and shake it up.
4. 'Craig isn’t keen on votes to challenge his ego' We have had around 20 Votes to shape the Rules of the Super League which demonstrates you are talking absolute kaka on so many levels.
Votes which have to clear you first. If you don't like the suggestion, it never goes to vote. Nobody is trying to break your damn league by coming up with a suggestion or a vote. We want it to be better, for more people.
5. Up to this Post, I have not been cheeky to you. But, if you don't like the Super League, feel free to leave. Because if you are going to be cheeky while absolutely having no clue what you are talking about. It's probably for the best that you do
Kick me out of the league if that's your decision but I'm not quitting something that as I've said above numerous times I enjoy. As I said above you hate challenges to your ego and this response of yours is case and point.
TLDR: 1) Trafalaxy and Trafalgar are the same map. If you have one banned, surely the other should be aswell. Quoting numbers based on variance rather than FACT is embarassing.
2) If anyone else would like to call for an overview or a vote on the 'round length cut off' for maps please post in support.
3) This started after someone said New Zealand was banned... a medium sized map with no bombards or anything difficult. I don't get it. I do for maps like Hive though. I am not calling for a mass unbanning.
