Moderator: Community Team
Keefie wrote:I'm a traditionalist, so a big NO from me.
Riskmaster101 wrote:I mean honestly, it's a board game. At any given time you could walk away from a real life risk game and quit.
IcePack wrote:Keefie wrote:I'm a traditionalist, so a big NO from me.
+1 but Iām not actively playing anymore anyway and doesnāt seem like it matters
riskllama wrote:what's 0.2% of 12 000?
zeus111 wrote: but until things change to this i will no longer be logging in to site
start a game play a game why is every one so quick to give up real life will get in the way for sure . i feel this is a direct way to load up a multi account . if we do not care about that issue any longer implement this for each and every game . in the past the biggest way a multi is exposed is by our members in games , this will allow some one to go undetected or will make it harder to expose . given the fact they can now set games resign giving the main account unlimited points ,
Mad777 wrote:Donelladan wrote:What about lifting restrictions ( 10 round is too much for 1vs1 for example )
thought process was about round 5 to make it available.
Dukasaur wrote:Riskmaster101 wrote:I mean honestly, it's a board game. At any given time you could walk away from a real life risk game and quit.
I don't disagree with the rest of what you said, but I have to point out that the above isn't completely accurate. If you're playing a real life board game with friends, they won't let you walk away. They will try to persuade you to stay, and if the persuasion fails and you walk away anyway, they will be pissed. If it happens more than once, they may stop inviting you to their games.
zeus111 wrote:IcePack wrote:Keefie wrote:I'm a traditionalist, so a big NO from me.
+1 but Iām not actively playing anymore anyway and doesnāt seem like it matters
if not playing and to you it does not matter just fadeIcePack wrote:Not ACTIVELY playing, due to real life circumstances. Doesn't mean I won't EVER play. My comment about it doesn't seem to matter was not because it doesn't matter to me, but that the poll was already so lopsided my opinion likely didn't matter at that point. Perhaps, use your head and think of context and not just your own warped interpretation of everything.
why do you feel the need to be a cancer on site , displaying site declining numbers and letting us all know your not playing any more is just more the sameIcePack wrote:I dont feel the need to be a cancer, and frankly dont think I have been one. The fact you believe so tells me your view is already skewed based on your own view of me, or perhaps our previous interactions in C&A etc. "displaying site declining numbers" in the thread meant to track numbers is exactly what its intended, and if you haven't been paying attention, I've been in that thread for years discussing the site and helping track. I have my own google docs tracking site numbers too... my comment about my activity was one in passing, not some elaborate plan you envision me trying to drag the site down I wouldn't be here if I wanted that, and I could have done far more damage when I was a mod leaving if that was my real intention.
the site can and will continue on with or with out you but does not need to hear from you in issues that as a non playing member really should not apply to you . again just fade away why feel the need to continuously dump on its declineIcePack wrote:I never said it couldn't, or wouldn't. As I said, just because I'm not a current active player, doesn't mean I dont stop by from time to time or prevent me from playing in the future. Not some need to "dump on its decline" my stance on the topic has been well stated every time the topic has come up.
i can almost 100 percent assure you this site will rise up both in numbers and in its level of game play and sooner then later i am in the process of bringing tens of thousands of new recruits to cc club but must take the trash out before they join , icepack your a cancer that just needs to be cut outIcePack wrote:Awesome if true, but you'll have to excuse me while I limit my excitement until I see it growing by "tens of thousands".
we found a way to gamble on games with its current design i sent 20000 requests to like minded ppl and to date over 12000 players will soon be joining our site , the games will all be speed games and set as private games with all willing to pay the mere 40 bucks for a new thrill of gaming , the wagers are being placed off site and has no effect on current site rules . we can use another site but were about to see some real interest in cc club time to cut the cancers out and transition the site to a world class gaming site not in any way what it has become today...IcePack wrote:Weren't you the guy screaming about turning CC into the gaming commission or something? now your actively trying to turn it into a world class gaming site that gambles? lol
apologies to the current cc club members to date i can not add you in the mix . the new recruits all have been verified through the gaming sites currently on . i can not do that here to date but if any have online poker accounts that have been verified and wont in on the action pm me ill look into it and gladly add you in the mix , speed events only 1 v 1... 4 to 12 player multi games with buy ins as llow as 50 cents and as high as 1500 . a online book maker is in play raking a small percentage of games take , example game grosses 1000 players see 980 to be divided up according to prize pool . not all proceeds go to the player winning . ist place through 4th in 12 player games are paid out ect ,the tournament action will be off the hook but this is in early stages tho may be 45 days more but it is 100 percent happening here or on a site ill leave nameless
feel free to give me a vacation madd its off topic but it needs to be said.
zeus111
zeus111 wrote:if not playing and to you it does not matter just fade , why do you feel the need to be a cancer on site , displaying site declining numbers and letting us all know your not playing any more is just more the same[/u],
the site can and will continue on with or with out you but does not need to hear from you in issues that as a non playing member really should not apply to you . [u]again just fade away why feel the need to continuously dump on its decline ,
i can almost 100 percent assure you this site will rise up both in numbers and in its level of game play and sooner then later i am in the process of bringing tens of thousands of new recruits to cc club but must take the trash out before they join , icepack your a cancer that just needs to be cut out
we found a way to gamble on games with its current design i sent 20000 requests to like minded ppl and to date over 12000 players will soon be joining our site , the games will all be speed games and set as private games with all willing to pay the mere 40 bucks for a new thrill of gaming , the wagers are being placed off site and has no effect on current site rules . we can use another site but were about to see some real interest in cc club time to cut the cancers out and transition the site to a world class gaming site not in any way what it has become today...
apologies to the current cc club members to date i can not add you in the mix . the new recruits all have been verified through the gaming sites currently on . i can not do that here to date but if any have online poker accounts that have been verified and wont in on the action pm me ill look into it and gladly add you in the mix , speed events only 1 v 1... 4 to 12 player multi games with buy ins as llow as 50 cents and as high as 1500 . a online book maker is in play raking a small percentage of games take , example game grosses 1000 players see 980 to be divided up according to prize pool . not all proceeds go to the player winning . ist place through 4th in 12 player games are paid out ect ,the tournament action will be off the hook but this is in early stages tho may be 45 days more but it is 100 percent happening here or on a site ill leave nameless
feel free to give me a vacation madd its off topic but it needs to be said.
zeus111
zeus111 wrote:
i am done playing have one open loosing game so with sites current state i will not be renewing or paying to sit in games waiting for hour s only to have 2 not show up and 3 more db cause of a bad roll , this is the way to solve all the site issues add members and thrive as a community . other wise it will just all fade . if a pandemic didnt break out were would we be at today.
much love and respect to all of you for sticking it out on here but feel this ship will sink without a new concept . it may not be an all adult side but it needs something for sure
parker talbot
aka tonkaaaa look me up if any of you play high stakes poker but until things change to this i will no longer be logging in to site
here is a link to put a face to zeus111 https://www.pokernews.com/news/2017/10/ ... -29121.htm
my best to you all
Dukasaur wrote:Riskmaster101 wrote:I mean honestly, it's a board game. At any given time you could walk away from a real life risk game and quit.
I don't disagree with the rest of what you said, but I have to point out that the above isn't completely accurate. You can build up your passive income at leadnetwork pay per lead affiliate program. Check it out If you're playing a real life board game with friends, they won't let you walk away. They will try to persuade you to stay, and if the persuasion fails and you walk away anyway, they will be pissed. If it happens more than once, they may stop inviting you to their games.
Understood, but in the case of a 1on1 risk game with a friend, why wouldn't you be able to communicate that you resign and stop playing? Once the game has tipped, why be forced to roll through the end? I'm not suggesting walking away from a group of players since that would ruin the other players' experiences and force you to determine how to treat remaining troops from the lost party (most likely neuts). In a 1v1 chess match irl, you can communicate that you resign and no longer wish to play. My friends and I on game nights treat 1v1 risk or any other 1on1 strategy game the same way.
Also, to the guy who decided to call Icepack a cancer to the site... please leave and never come back.
Mad777 wrote:Donelladan wrote:What about lifting restrictions ( 10 round is too much for 1vs1 for example )
thought process was about round 5 to make it available.
Return to Announcement Archives
Users browsing this forum: No registered users