Conquer Club

Warned b00060 [ka]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

Re: b00060

Postby Jdsizzleslice on Sat Jan 18, 2020 9:38 am

iAmCaffeine wrote:I didn't wish death or cancer on any kids. Just like to clarify that, thank you.

iAmCaffeine wrote:hope you choke on cancer and your kids

Not sure how else you interpret this statement. The language used here means to suggest he gets cancer, and either that your kids also get the same cancer or that you would literally have his kids forced down his windpipe. Either way, wishing someone has cancer has the same connotation of wishing them death.

b00060 wrote:I HAD MORE MEN THAN HIM, HE WAS NEVER GOING TO WIN ANYWAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You had less than half of his troops before the last round. He would have won the game if you would have not attacked him. So it's actually the opposite, you were never going to win the game. Having more men than him in the last round does not justify your action.
User avatar
Brigadier Jdsizzleslice
 
Posts: 3576
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 9:55 pm
32

Re: b00060

Postby zeus111 on Sat Jan 18, 2020 12:32 pm

Mad777 wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:I didn't wish death or cancer on any kids. Just like to clarify that, thank you.


just for recall and perhaps my interpretation of english is not clear but;

2020-01-15 14:28:59 - iAmCaffeine: hope you choke on cancer and your kids, if they're unfortunate enough to exist, never say goodbye


Now outside of this i think you both need to relax...it is an online game...happen to all of us and yet it may not be funny but nothing justify the boiling bad words and attitude for sure a situation.

Foed each other and move on. If any sentence would come off this case both should get something or no one. No rules breaking here that would require punitive outcome unless one for going after Caff troops and the other for shooting such irrelevant insults into the game chat.


the insults did come after the attack , the foe option wont apply in tournaments these two play a lot of i think we really do need a verdict here . ill stand by the above statements all b0060 did was attack his adjoining regions in round 19 i feel he played the game the way it was designed . i also feel if the troops were placed correctly they could not be hit , it was a trench round limit game and b0060 played as he saw fit attacked 2 regions with in his striking range .

the only thing i can see is a warning for the chat . why is it we can say thing like cocksucker in game chat vs wanker in gc is a no no . madd you are in charge these daze can we clear this issue up pls . make speech the same in all cc areas . the c bombs vs wanker well u decide all that but the pure hate speech wishing a member choke on cancer we can do with out , after all b0060 attacked in game designed for attacking regardless the round the regions attacked risk has zero rules on who why or where one can strike .

battle royale game i was in i had locked or thought i did when backhander cashed in a 3 card set hit me with 4000 less troops with zero chance he could win but had sexy dice and in the last round i lost the much sot after br win . it sucked for sure but as in this case no rules broken i had to suck it up and looking back the 200 x i did in that game i saw a move that prevented it . so it was my fault for poor play as is the case here , we can not limit attacking options in a game that attacking territories is how its played nor can we determine a games winner until the final round of attacks are complete .

so to say i had this game in round 18 of 20 then to suggest a no attack zone for round 19 and 20 defeats the whole concept of risk not to mention there is no real way in a foggy game to see troops counts of opponents so to caffs request to set a precedent the mod should not in any way back that up . its simply not how the games played .


zeus111
User avatar
Lieutenant zeus111
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 5:35 pm
Location: canada

Re: b00060

Postby iAmCaffeine on Sat Jan 18, 2020 7:44 pm

Jdsizzleslice wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:I didn't wish death or cancer on any kids. Just like to clarify that, thank you.

iAmCaffeine wrote:hope you choke on cancer and your kids

Not sure how else you interpret this statement. The language used here means to suggest he gets cancer, and either that your kids also get the same cancer or that you would literally have his kids forced down his windpipe. Either way, wishing someone has cancer has the same connotation of wishing them death.

b00060 wrote:I HAD MORE MEN THAN HIM, HE WAS NEVER GOING TO WIN ANYWAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You had less than half of his troops before the last round. He would have won the game if you would have not attacked him. So it's actually the opposite, you were never going to win the game. Having more men than him in the last round does not justify your action.

I never wished his kids to have cancer. Read the full sentence. Technically I should have used - instead of , but nobody knows how to use - properly these days and always use , instead so I just did the same.

My insult was based on him getting cancer and his kids - if they were unfortunate enough to exist in the first place (because he’d be their dad) - never say goodbye to him.

Not very nice I’ll admit. In fact I’d go as far as saying that’s pretty horrible. As is unfair and unjust gameplay in my personal opinion, which I realise is not a perspective shared with everyone. I’d also argue that the integrity of a competitive game and a trophy title are also worth more than words said online by someone you barely know, but oddly enough that is also an unpopular opinion.

I’m glad you can see he unjustly fucked me from winning the tournament though.
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: b00060

Postby iAmCaffeine on Sat Jan 18, 2020 7:46 pm

Also zeus I was attacked in rd20 not rd19. Stop repeating that bullshit. The screenshots arent hard to understand.
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: b00060

Postby zeus111 on Sat Jan 18, 2020 8:04 pm

iAmCaffeine wrote:Also zeus I was attacked in rd20 not rd19. Stop repeating that bullshit. The screenshots arent hard to understand.


2020-01-12 22:47:00 - Incrementing game to round 19 :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
2020-01-13 11:06:40 - iAmCaffeine received 4 troops for holding Aragón
2020-01-13 11:06:40 - iAmCaffeine received 2 troops for holding Cataluña
2020-01-13 11:06:40 - iAmCaffeine received 4 troops for 13 regions
2020-01-13 11:06:48 - iAmCaffeine played a set of Faro, Cáceres, and Palencia worth 6 troops
2020-01-13 11:06:58 - iAmCaffeine deployed 16 troops on País Vasco
2020-01-13 11:07:02 - iAmCaffeine reinforced Zaragoza with 2 troops from Soria
2020-01-13 11:07:02 - iAmCaffeine ended the turn
2020-01-13 12:14:28 - dragon dor received 3 troops for 5 regions
2020-01-13 12:14:35 - dragon dor deployed 3 troops on Palencia
2020-01-13 12:14:39 - dragon dor assaulted Valladolid from Palencia and conquered it from redlion
2020-01-13 12:14:44 - dragon dor assaulted Guarda from Bragança and conquered it from b00060
2020-01-13 12:15:08 - dragon dor reinforced Valladolid with 12 troops from Burgos
2020-01-13 12:15:08 - dragon dor ended the turn and got spoils
2020-01-13 19:28:24 - b00060 received 2 troops for holding Alentejo
2020-01-13 19:28:24 - b00060 received 6 troops for holding Andalucia
2020-01-13 19:28:24 - b00060 received 7 troops for 22 regions
2020-01-13 19:28:28 - b00060 played a set of Vila Real, Setúbal, and Barcelona worth 10 troops
2020-01-13 19:28:28 - b00060 got bonus of 2 troops added to Setúbal
2020-01-13 19:28:36 - b00060 deployed 25 troops on Cuenca =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
2020-01-13 19:28:37 - b00060 assaulted Valencia from Cuenca and conquered it from iAmCaffeine :o :o :o :o :o
2020-01-13 19:28:41 - b00060 assaulted Teruel from Cuenca and conquered it from iAmCaffeine :o :o :o :o :o 2020-01-14 17:26:43 - Incrementing game to round 20
2020-01-15 12:27:51 - iAmCaffeine received 2 troops for holding Cataluña
2020-01-15 12:27:51 - iAmCaffeine received 3 troops for 10 regions
2020-01-15 12:28:37 - iAmCaffeine deployed 5 troops on Zaragoza
2020-01-15 12:28:38 - iAmCaffeine assaulted Teruel from Zaragoza and conquered it from b00060 :?: last round in trench rnd limit and you attack ???
2020-01-15 12:28:40 - iAmCaffeine ended the turn and got spoils
2020-01-15 14:24:13 - dragon dor received 3 troops for 5 regions
2020-01-15 14:24:28 - dragon dor deployed 3 troops on Guarda
2020-01-15 14:24:38 - dragon dor assaulted Coimbra from Guarda and conquered it from redlion
2020-01-15 14:26:07 - dragon dor ended the turn and got spoils
2020-01-15 19:09:20 - b00060 received 2 troops for holding Alentejo
2020-01-15 19:09:20 - b00060 received 6 troops for holding Andalucia
2020-01-15 19:09:20 - b00060 received 7 troops for 22 regions
2020-01-15 19:09:28 - b00060 deployed 15 troops on Cuenca
2020-01-15 19:09:30 - b00060 assaulted Teruel from Cuenca and conquered it from iAmCaffeine
2020-01-15 19:09:32 - b00060 ended the turn and got spoils
2020-01-15 20:38:24 - CaronylKluster received 2 troops for holding Galicia
2020-01-15 20:38:24 - CaronylKluster received 3 troops for 10 regions
2020-01-15 20:38:32 - CaronylKluster played a set of Valladolid, Lugo, and Segovia worth 4 troops
2020-01-15 20:38:32 - CaronylKluster got bonus of 2 troops added to Lugo
2020-01-15 20:38:47 - CaronylKluster deployed 9 troops on Lugo
2020-01-15 20:38:56 - CaronylKluster reinforced Asturias with 31 troops from Cantabria
2020-01-15 20:38:56 - CaronylKluster ended the turn
2020-01-15 23:11:31 - redlion received 3 troops for 7 regions
2020-01-15 23:11:34 - redlion played a set of Cuenca, Guadalajara, and Tarragona worth 8 troops
2020-01-15 23:11:34 - redlion got bonus of 2 troops added to Guadalajara
2020-01-15 23:11:43 - redlion deployed 11 troops on Burgos
2020-01-15 23:14:34 - redlion ended the turn
2020-01-15 23:14:34 - Round limit reached, CaronylKluster has the most troops
Last edited by zeus111 on Sat Jan 18, 2020 8:11 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Lieutenant zeus111
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 5:35 pm
Location: canada

Re: b00060

Postby zeus111 on Sat Jan 18, 2020 8:06 pm

clearly again your wrong round 19 m8 was the attack the took the stacks Valencia9 and Teruel 25 .he dropped 25 on his 4 stack and took 34 troops game logs dont lie but hey tell yourself whatever it takes here
User avatar
Lieutenant zeus111
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 5:35 pm
Location: canada

Re: b00060

Postby iAmCaffeine on Sat Jan 18, 2020 8:31 pm

True, he attacked rd19. When commenting just now, I forgot I had first turn of the round. I’ve been driving for 6hrs or more though so I’m going to be benevolent and let myself off.

I attacked in rd20 because my game was already lost from captain cockhead’s actions the round before. It didn’t matter by that point.

Not sure why you said “again”. I find it highly improbable I was wrong more than one time in this thread.

Can we stop talking now and just wait for the mods? I know I don’t have to reply but i prefer doing so if something is due to be answered. This back and forth isn’t really going anywhere. Jdsizzle’s comments on b0000009996660’s actions sum it up well
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: b00060

Postby Kotaro on Sat Jan 18, 2020 8:37 pm

When you believe that someone attacking you in an online video game is on equal ground as wishing someone death, let alone emotional trauma to possibly fictional children, maybe you should reevaluate your life/shitty priorities.
Lakad Matataaag!
Normalin, normalin.

Image

TheJonah wrote:I`m not really that arsed. Just supporting my mucker.
User avatar
Lieutenant Kotaro
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:31 pm
Location: TheJonah: You`re a fucking ruthless, little cunt!

Re: b00060

Postby zeus111 on Sat Jan 18, 2020 8:56 pm

iAmCaffeine wrote:True, he attacked rd19. When commenting just now, I forgot I had first turn of the round. I’ve been driving for 6hrs or more though so I’m going to be benevolent and let myself off.

I attacked in rd20 because my game was already lost from captain cockhead’s actions the round before. It didn’t matter by that point.

Not sure why you said “again”. I find it highly improbable I was wrong more than one time in this thread.

Can we stop talking now and just wait for the mods? I know I don’t have to reply but i prefer doing so if something is due to be answered. This back and forth isn’t really going anywhere. Jdsizzle’s comments on b0000009996660’s actions sum it up well


no caff jdsizzles comments regarding b0060 do not sum it up all b00600 did was attack regions within striking distance of his territories in the late rounds of the game well with in all site rules.. for it he has been accused of cheating name called and death wished upon him .

now there is the fact you stated it was a final round 20 attack when clearly it was not when accusing some one at least get the facts straight the details are kind of important ,

so lets finally wrap this up . you are crying over a round 19 attack in a 20 round game on troops you left vulnerable then ask site to prohibit a loosing member from attacking the leader in this round or the last , its just like stated above a childish rant from a piss poor sport

answer last question you were wrong about the round the attack occurred and you were wrong saying the game was yours . yellow was attacking you in round 20 on pals vasco . your wrong in assuming in round 18 you won the game .

only violation here chat by you

zeus111
User avatar
Lieutenant zeus111
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 5:35 pm
Location: canada

Re: b00060

Postby TeeGee on Sat Jan 18, 2020 10:50 pm

I have locked this
There is no new evidence, just a lot of school yard bickering that does not belong in here.
I'm still on vacation so will be passing this onto the remaining members of C&A to look into

I think you ALL need to walk away from your devices for a while and then you might see how petty you all are really being here.
Image
User avatar
Major TeeGee
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 6976
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 5:07 pm

Re: b00060

Postby king achilles on Tue Jan 21, 2020 7:54 pm

From the snapshots provided:
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=232202#p5134230

It looks like those assaults on Teruel and Valencia did the damage on IAC. True, that the game is set in Trench and he could have moved his stacks to avoid those attacks. On the other hand, b00060 could have also sit still instead and not made those attacks, which any player in the lead at the time would expect him to do. Still, it does look like he went his way to make sure who would win the game from that particular round. b00060 has been issued an official warning for Game Throwing. iAmCaffeine has also been warned for his outburst in the game chat.

Yes, I agree that no one is obligated to let anyone win a game and that you are there to kill one another. However, this must be guided under the principle that you must play to win. If there was a small difference, it would be completely fine to attack any other players if you thought you even had any type of chance of winning.. even if this required extremely lucky dice.

Though, if there was a considerable difference and you really had no chance and the situation is like there are players A > B > C and C attacks A on the last turn of the game, reducing them below B, so that B wins, C had no chance of winning as they were already last, it's a classic case of game throwing.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class king achilles
Support Admin
Support Admin
 
Posts: 13255
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:55 pm

Previous

Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users