INTO THE DEEP (COMPLETE - Mafia Win !!)
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
I'll visit you Ragoo <3
But you gotta visit my discord
But you gotta visit my discord

Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh
Join Discord group for multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
I was thinking earlier about saying who I plan on visiting tonite and then i remembered why it would be an awful idea.Ragian wrote:You would because if it's not chap, it's you. Could you be a doll and visit me tonight if you're the actual scum?blacky365 wrote:Thanks for putting these together... I think we have missed something here!Skoffin wrote:No, not blacky. I'm going off chap's bus/investigation from yesterday wherein he said that there is 1 scum out of ragoo/tobi/myself/strike. People here have claimed that tobi would have appeared as town on that report, and if that is the case then strike/ragoo/me are still suspect by that report. Chap is added for obvious reasons, and no one really suspects strike. Therefore ragoo, chap and me should be the focus.TX AG 90 wrote:You forgot blacky.Skoffin wrote: Honestly I've been skimming past Serius' post and I doubt I'm missing much. Either scum or useless. Or both lol
I am finding it hard to believe that chap was here up until it was his turn to claim, and now he's whooshed elsewhere. This order thing is going to run out the clock.
In anycase, today's lynch should be between Ragoo, myself and Chap.
Will post more after work.
Chap, you, Ragian, or blacky.
Chap claimed that 1 out of a group of 4 is scum - Rage is in that group
Rage claimed that 1 out of a group of 2 is scum - Chap is in that group
Might I be so bold as to say one of these two are lying...?
I will tell you tomorrow who i visited...
in the meantime, tick tock 48 hours since my claim and still nothing from Chap, so
Vote chapcrap
- Pikanchion
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 9:10 pm
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
Has chapcrap been prodded?
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
Maybe don't lynch him before we get claims eh?

Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh
Join Discord group for multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
erm... you have a vote on here too!Skoffin wrote:Maybe don't lynch him before we get claims eh?
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
NVM turns out I can't count. Anyway we all agree to drop the claim order, right Pika? Since you're here mate would you like to claim and I will aswell?

Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh
Join Discord group for multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
But I voted firstblacky365 wrote:erm... you have a vote on here too!Skoffin wrote:Maybe don't lynch him before we get claims eh?

Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh
Join Discord group for multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
- Pikanchion
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 9:10 pm
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
I don't understand why we were given a deadline when there's a player who has not visited the forums in a week and there is no notion of them being replaced.
- TX AG 90
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Houston Metro - League City
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
We were given a deadline? - I missed it.Pikanchion wrote:I don't understand why we were given a deadline when there's a player who has not visited the forums in a week and there is no notion of them being replaced.
- Pikanchion
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 9:10 pm
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
TX AG 90 wrote:We were given a deadline? - I missed it.
Razorvich wrote:Day 5 will end: CC Time: 2019-05-13 05:59:59
- Sirius Kase
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 6:35 pm
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
Between those 2? Softball question. i'd say Chap. Blacky contributes to the dialogue.Ragian wrote:So...if you had to vote between Chap and Blacky, who'd it be, Sirius?
Same thing isn't it. The way Ragian claimed, it sounded legit. But, chap has disappeared. Has he been mod prodded?BuJaber wrote: Ragian claimed he used his bonus ability last night and targetted TX, Blacky, and chap. The result he received is that 1 of those 3 is a healer and only 1 of the non-healers is scum.
[img]https://s24.postimg.org/6rwmdezkl/signature-_IWWYL8_P7.png[/img]
- Sirius Kase
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 6:35 pm
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 4)
Found this from April 19
I like the way Clap devised a test, unfortunately, it had a design flaw. Ragian is also testing in a systematic way. I like that. But, mass claim, going down the list one at a time, I don't see it. And the way we are doing it is wrong. BuJ should have gone first. The first claimer should be the most townish, and he should suggest the next person. Why did BuJ point at Blacky without himself claiming or otherwise demonstrating that he was town? Why, well because Pika has been calling BuJ confirmed town repeatedly, but when asked to explain, he says he can't reveal. That makes Pika and BuJ look like a team, if not scum. Several have pointed it out, yet they started this silly mass claim anyway.
I think we are about to find out something from Clap. It appears he wants to be lynched. He is scum and wants suicide by cop, or he's town. If he flips town, that will completely discredit Pika and BuJ and their badly designed mass claim.
We can sit back and wait, we can lynch or not, but night is coming, and we should have a plan in place.
Is this what you mean? I know this rule. But I haven't gone for food. My bonus ability was triggered by me using my regular ability correctly. No mention of it being a one off. I still don't know what I did correctly. I made several attempts to use my ability, and at some point, the mod sent me a PM saying I was successful and that my bonus was enabled. Unfortunately, he didn't indicate which of my attempts was successful.ZaBeast wrote: Also I'm tired of people skimming the rules. ABILITY FROM GOING FOR FOOD CAN ONLY BE USED ONCE.
Similarly we should test our investigators. I just don't get pumping exactly one person at a time for incriminating information. You know scum will lie, and honest people might be compelled to reveal something that we wouldn't want scum to know.Sirius Kase wrote:Separately, we can test our healers...
I like the way Clap devised a test, unfortunately, it had a design flaw. Ragian is also testing in a systematic way. I like that. But, mass claim, going down the list one at a time, I don't see it. And the way we are doing it is wrong. BuJ should have gone first. The first claimer should be the most townish, and he should suggest the next person. Why did BuJ point at Blacky without himself claiming or otherwise demonstrating that he was town? Why, well because Pika has been calling BuJ confirmed town repeatedly, but when asked to explain, he says he can't reveal. That makes Pika and BuJ look like a team, if not scum. Several have pointed it out, yet they started this silly mass claim anyway.
I think we are about to find out something from Clap. It appears he wants to be lynched. He is scum and wants suicide by cop, or he's town. If he flips town, that will completely discredit Pika and BuJ and their badly designed mass claim.
We can sit back and wait, we can lynch or not, but night is coming, and we should have a plan in place.
[img]https://s24.postimg.org/6rwmdezkl/signature-_IWWYL8_P7.png[/img]
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
There's no room for error and systematic test, man. We need to lynch scum today lest we lose the game. Are you going to be an active part in that? I.e. using your vote?

Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
What do we do if chap doesn't come back?

Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh
Join Discord group for multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
Sounds fair.
I'm not really keen to lynch someone without them claiming though, but I also don't want to vote someone less suspicious so close to end game. We also don't have anyone to replace chap if he doesn't come back soon so...
no one has really commented on whether they are in favour of us all just claiming -forgoing the order thing- so yeah what gives bruv
I'm not really keen to lynch someone without them claiming though, but I also don't want to vote someone less suspicious so close to end game. We also don't have anyone to replace chap if he doesn't come back soon so...
no one has really commented on whether they are in favour of us all just claiming -forgoing the order thing- so yeah what gives bruv

Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh
Join Discord group for multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
- Sirius Kase
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 6:35 pm
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
There are reserves listed in first post. But, it would be quite a task coming in, facing a lynch, mounting a defense, etc. Possibly because Clap was doing poor job. When strike came in under similar conditions, we gave him a chance, and he turned out okay.
We shouldn't lynch until we have conducted a proper investigation and know alignment with a high level of certainty. We are lynching people just to find out their alignment. We are lynching people who present poorly, but flip town. Town has killed more town than scum has. That's no way to win.
We have, or at last had, the tools to conduct an investigation. We shouldn't have lynched anybody until we understood our abilities. Random lynches hurt the larger team. Not always, but usually. So, it's better not to lynch at all than to lynch at random.
I suggest we ask Razor to replace Clap with someone else. Then that person should immediately tell us about his abilities. Then anyone else with useful abilities should tell us about them, including whether it is a one shot that must be used immediately or can be used later. We can put together a plan while new guy catches up on his reading. By plan, I mean a specific procedure for what we do at night. If someone has a comparison ability, we should make sure it is used to identify scum and not just protect the proposer of the plan and his buddies.
Reads:
- Claptrap town, I had a lot of confidence in him up to the time he disappeared. He got a lot of heat for not correctly understanding his ability. But, that heat might have chased him away. I believe he still has the ability to do some sort of pairwise comparison. That's why I'd rather see him replaced than lynched.
- Pika and Buj, scum. Pika keeps repeating that BuJ is confirmed town without saying why BuJ is confirmed town. BuJ isn't saying either. Pika is leading the discussion which seems more about keeping people looking everywhere except at BuJ and himself. I was extremely bothered that BuJ didn't make a full claim before pointing at Blacky.
VOTE NOLYNCH, not without a plan that includes a proper investigation.
We shouldn't lynch until we have conducted a proper investigation and know alignment with a high level of certainty. We are lynching people just to find out their alignment. We are lynching people who present poorly, but flip town. Town has killed more town than scum has. That's no way to win.
We have, or at last had, the tools to conduct an investigation. We shouldn't have lynched anybody until we understood our abilities. Random lynches hurt the larger team. Not always, but usually. So, it's better not to lynch at all than to lynch at random.
I suggest we ask Razor to replace Clap with someone else. Then that person should immediately tell us about his abilities. Then anyone else with useful abilities should tell us about them, including whether it is a one shot that must be used immediately or can be used later. We can put together a plan while new guy catches up on his reading. By plan, I mean a specific procedure for what we do at night. If someone has a comparison ability, we should make sure it is used to identify scum and not just protect the proposer of the plan and his buddies.
Reads:
- Claptrap town, I had a lot of confidence in him up to the time he disappeared. He got a lot of heat for not correctly understanding his ability. But, that heat might have chased him away. I believe he still has the ability to do some sort of pairwise comparison. That's why I'd rather see him replaced than lynched.
- Pika and Buj, scum. Pika keeps repeating that BuJ is confirmed town without saying why BuJ is confirmed town. BuJ isn't saying either. Pika is leading the discussion which seems more about keeping people looking everywhere except at BuJ and himself. I was extremely bothered that BuJ didn't make a full claim before pointing at Blacky.
VOTE NOLYNCH, not without a plan that includes a proper investigation.
[img]https://s24.postimg.org/6rwmdezkl/signature-_IWWYL8_P7.png[/img]
-
strike wolf
- Posts: 8345
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:03 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sandy Springs, GA (just north of Atlanta)
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
So apparently the mod doesn't actually consider the act of poisoning a kill action. I disagree but that's besides the point. It basically means I couldn't heal Blacky twice in one night so if he visited Rage Night 2, he should have been poisoned again (It still doesn't answer why I was told my extra bonus condition which was supposed to be only told to me after I had succeeded in my first but at this point I'm leaning mod mistake until I've been informed otherwise). So either Blacky is telling the truth about N2 and we still have the poison-> role block contradiction with Blacky and Buj or Blacky is lying about what happened N2.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
@Sirius
You need to think this through though
-Do you think BuJ claiming would have given you a better idea of his alignment? If not, why would you have wanted him to claim? If so, how so?
-Does pika clearing BuJ automatically makes him scum if pika is scum or could it be his way of getting town cred?
Also I'll just put that back out there
You need to think this through though
-Do you think BuJ claiming would have given you a better idea of his alignment? If not, why would you have wanted him to claim? If so, how so?
-Does pika clearing BuJ automatically makes him scum if pika is scum or could it be his way of getting town cred?
I wasn't talking about your bonus ability but pika (or chap's at that time). Could you explain how you "attempted to use your ability" though? Coming from someone who claimed enabler that's pretty suspiciousSirius Kase wrote:Found this from April 19
Is this what you mean? I know this rule. But I haven't gone for food. My bonus ability was triggered by me using my regular ability correctly. No mention of it being a one off. I still don't know what I did correctly. I made several attempts to use my ability, and at some point, the mod sent me a PM saying I was successful and that my bonus was enabled. Unfortunately, he didn't indicate which of my attempts was successful.ZaBeast wrote: Also I'm tired of people skimming the rules. ABILITY FROM GOING FOR FOOD CAN ONLY BE USED ONCE.
Also I'll just put that back out there
Ragian wrote:There's no room for error and systematic test, man. We need to lynch scum today lest we lose the game. Are you going to be an active part in that? I.e. using your vote?

Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
Apologies for being thick... can you explain why my N2 action is causing a problem? I dont see where Buj claimed differently.strike wolf wrote:So apparently the mod doesn't actually consider the act of poisoning a kill action. I disagree but that's besides the point. It basically means I couldn't heal Blacky twice in one night so if he visited Rage Night 2, he should have been poisoned again (It still doesn't answer why I was told my extra bonus condition which was supposed to be only told to me after I had succeeded in my first but at this point I'm leaning mod mistake until I've been informed otherwise). So either Blacky is telling the truth about N2 and we still have the poison-> role block contradiction with Blacky and Buj or Blacky is lying about what happened N2.
- TX AG 90
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Houston Metro - League City
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
Yeah, I'm confused too.blacky365 wrote:Apologies for being thick... can you explain why my N2 action is causing a problem? I dont see where Buj claimed differently.strike wolf wrote:So apparently the mod doesn't actually consider the act of poisoning a kill action. I disagree but that's besides the point. It basically means I couldn't heal Blacky twice in one night so if he visited Rage Night 2, he should have been poisoned again (It still doesn't answer why I was told my extra bonus condition which was supposed to be only told to me after I had succeeded in my first but at this point I'm leaning mod mistake until I've been informed otherwise). So either Blacky is telling the truth about N2 and we still have the poison-> role block contradiction with Blacky and Buj or Blacky is lying about what happened N2.
- TX AG 90
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Houston Metro - League City
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
Yeah, I'm confused too.blacky365 wrote:Apologies for being thick... can you explain why my N2 action is causing a problem? I dont see where Buj claimed differently.strike wolf wrote:So apparently the mod doesn't actually consider the act of poisoning a kill action. I disagree but that's besides the point. It basically means I couldn't heal Blacky twice in one night so if he visited Rage Night 2, he should have been poisoned again (It still doesn't answer why I was told my extra bonus condition which was supposed to be only told to me after I had succeeded in my first but at this point I'm leaning mod mistake until I've been informed otherwise). So either Blacky is telling the truth about N2 and we still have the poison-> role block contradiction with Blacky and Buj or Blacky is lying about what happened N2.
-
strike wolf
- Posts: 8345
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:03 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sandy Springs, GA (just north of Atlanta)
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
Blacky said that he wasn't able to perform an action the night after being poisoned. Buj stated that this wasn't the case for him. It's a contradiction on the effects of poisoning. Blacky said that he had tried to visit Rage N2, I had used this as a possible reason he didn't receive an action result N2 "due to having been poisoned" since Rages ability would have prevented it and I visited him and possibly healed him again. The mod clarified that this wouldn't be the case so that explanation doesn't fit.TX AG 90 wrote:Yeah, I'm confused too.blacky365 wrote:Apologies for being thick... can you explain why my N2 action is causing a problem? I dont see where Buj claimed differently.strike wolf wrote:So apparently the mod doesn't actually consider the act of poisoning a kill action. I disagree but that's besides the point. It basically means I couldn't heal Blacky twice in one night so if he visited Rage Night 2, he should have been poisoned again (It still doesn't answer why I was told my extra bonus condition which was supposed to be only told to me after I had succeeded in my first but at this point I'm leaning mod mistake until I've been informed otherwise). So either Blacky is telling the truth about N2 and we still have the poison-> role block contradiction with Blacky and Buj or Blacky is lying about what happened N2.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Re: INTO THE DEEP (Day 5)
Ok i get where you are coming from.strike wolf wrote:Blacky said that he wasn't able to perform an action the night after being poisoned. Buj stated that this wasn't the case for him. It's a contradiction on the effects of poisoning. Blacky said that he had tried to visit Rage N2, I had used this as a possible reason he didn't receive an action result N2 "due to having been poisoned" since Rages ability would have prevented it and I visited him and possibly healed him again. The mod clarified that this wouldn't be the case so that explanation doesn't fit.TX AG 90 wrote:Yeah, I'm confused too.blacky365 wrote:Apologies for being thick... can you explain why my N2 action is causing a problem? I dont see where Buj claimed differently.strike wolf wrote:So apparently the mod doesn't actually consider the act of poisoning a kill action. I disagree but that's besides the point. It basically means I couldn't heal Blacky twice in one night so if he visited Rage Night 2, he should have been poisoned again (It still doesn't answer why I was told my extra bonus condition which was supposed to be only told to me after I had succeeded in my first but at this point I'm leaning mod mistake until I've been informed otherwise). So either Blacky is telling the truth about N2 and we still have the poison-> role block contradiction with Blacky and Buj or Blacky is lying about what happened N2.
It could simply be the case that my poisoning was slightly different to BUJ
Perhaps i was hit twice (by JFM & Rage) so needed longer to recover?
Truth is I dont know why I would be different, and I guess we wont know until the game is over and we can study the mechanics of each night,
