the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

hawkeye · Post by **hawkeye** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 2:53 pm

hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Sammy gags · Post by **Sammy gags** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 3:05 pm

the longest thread is 1,300 pages of spam

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 3:22 pm

WOW! I think my IQ has dropped just by reading these last 3 pages.
Can we get back to actually discussing something?

CBlake · Post by **CBlake** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 3:25 pm

like what

rocksolid · Post by **rocksolid** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 3:55 pm

Like whether or not people should restrain themselves to only posting twice per page. I think that would be an interesting topic.

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 3:57 pm

thats a good idea, but what if you are actually discussing something important, like when kyle had girl problems about 12 pages back?

Scarus · Post by **Scarus** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:10 pm

Speaking of the Rev, why Reverand? Are you preaching to all of us poor lost souls, or is that just a gimmick to get in good with the babes?

rocksolid · Post by **rocksolid** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:49 pm

That's what I was wondering...if he was "Reverend" just because his last name means "Praise God".

And the 2 posts a page thing could just be a rule of thumb, not a hard rule. Besides, it's not like we could enforce it or anything - it would just be nice if people held back a little from posting 5 two-word entries a page for four pages. If there's actual content to the post - three or four lines of text - it makes it a lot less tedious to wade through.

johnnyrotten · Post by **johnnyrotten** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 5:54 pm

Seems like an idea to me.

Although ocko's posts are always tedious, no matter what

TitusFinn · Post by **TitusFinn** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:31 pm

I disagree. Especially on this thread. It's mostly silly stuff anyways. So you goof around for a bit, big deal. I'm totally opposed to limiting what people can say.

hawkeye · Post by **hawkeye** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:40 pm

thank u titus i agree

gloryordeath · Post by **gloryordeath** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:41 pm

AK_iceman wrote:WOW! I think my IQ has dropped just by reading these last 3 pages.
Can we get back to actually discussing something?

only a few? yes anythings beter than that crap.

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:41 pm

I am all for freedom of speech, but I agree with Scarus, this is a complete shoutbox.

No real coversations go on anymore, and those last few pages dropped my IQ 100 points.

I realize that the stated purpose of this thread is to be the longest thread out there, but if that were the true purpose, then why would any one ever make a statement about the thread containing spam?

Being part of the longest thread would be cool but the journey is the most fun part...

Sorry for the rant.

That's just my two cents, now I'm broke again.

Scarus · Post by **Scarus** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:43 pm

Well then, lets start by limiting TF's right to object....lol

Why stop there. Let's trample on everyone's Longest Thread's Rights...lol

As a matter of fact, that might give us something to work on for a while....

A Longest Thread Bill of Rights....lol

I'll start,

1. Right to Assemble, Bear Arms, Freedom of Religion, and The Press, with prohibitions against Assemblies of more than one person, shooting your mouth off, and double posting....

gloryordeath · Post by **gloryordeath** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:43 pm

Machiavelli wrote:I am all for freedom of speech, but I agree with Scarus, this is a complete shoutbox.

No real coversations go on anymore, and those last few pages dropped my IQ 100 points.

I realize that the stated purpose of this thread is to be the longest thread out there, but if that were the true purpose, then why would any one ever make a statement about the thread containing spam?

Being part of the longest thread would be cool but the journey is the most fun part...

Sorry for the rant.

That's just my two cents, now I'm broke again.

here i'll front you a dime for the next one

hawkeye · Post by **hawkeye** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:43 pm

was ur iq 100 pts in the 1st place

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:46 pm

Scarus wrote:Well then, lets start by limiting TF's right to object....lol

Why stop there. Let's trample on everyone's Longest Thread's Rights...lol

As a matter of fact, that might give us something to work on for a while....

A Longest Thread Bill of Rights....lol

I'll start,

1. Right to Assemble,Arm Bears, Freedom of Religion, and The Press, with prohibitions against Assemblies of more than one person, your mouth off, and double posting....

Why do the bears need guns?

gloryordeath · Post by **gloryordeath** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:46 pm

Scarus wrote:Well then, lets start by limiting TF's right to object....lol

Why stop there. Let's trample on everyone's Longest Thread's Rights...lol

As a matter of fact, that might give us something to work on for a while....

A Longest Thread Bill of Rights....lol

I'll start,

1. Right to Assemble, Bear Arms, Freedom of Religion, and The Press, with prohibitions against Assemblies of more than one person, shooting your mouth off, and double posting....

beer arms? ok i'm in i just got a keg!

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:47 pm

hawkeye wrote:was ur iq 100 pts in the 1st place

Actually it was 101

TitusFinn · Post by **TitusFinn** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:49 pm

Machiavelli wrote: No real coversations go on anymore...

Looks to me as THIS is a real conversation and that the "IQ dropping" banter was the spark for it.

TitusFinn · Post by **TitusFinn** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:51 pm

TitusFinn wrote:
Machiavelli wrote: No real coversations go on anymore...
Looks to me as THIS is a real conversation and that the "IQ dropping" banter was the spark for it.

Or it WAS a real conversation, until we started to talk about the right to arm beer and bears.

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:51 pm

Well then, I guess that we are already taking a step in the right direction.

Kylie · Post by **Kylie** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:59 pm

after tonight i dont think i will drink for a very long time lol

gloryordeath · Post by **gloryordeath** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:04 pm

why so dear girl?

Kylie · Post by **Kylie** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:10 pm

me and jason drank a whole thing of rum and walked around in the 95" humid heat for like 3 hrs lol

the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW

Rev

limits

Re: limits

Re: limits