Conquer Club

[MWC4r]S&M (12) vs (9) FOED - S&M WINS - Final 6/18

Finished challenges between two competitive clans.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[MWC4r]S&M (12) vs (9) FOED - S&M WINS - Final 6/18

Postby MTIceman41 on Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:21 pm

Great starting battle between S&M and FOED: GL everyone :D
CLICK ME

Link to Clan War

show: Contacts

show: Start Date

show: Rules of Engagement

show: Maps Allowed

show: SandM Home Games

show: FOED Home Games

show: tiebreaker

show: SandM Player Count

show: FOED Player Count

show: Ranking Confirmation
Last edited by MTIceman41 on Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:06 am, edited 45 times in total.
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby iAmCaffeine on Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:34 am

You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby MTIceman41 on Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:31 am

iAmCaffeine wrote:You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.


Why thank you!
Been six years last time I set on of these up...don't judge the edit totals :lol:
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby IcePack on Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:34 am

Wow S+M vs FOED in Round 1, tough draw but fun to watch!
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
User avatar
Major IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16631
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby iAmCaffeine on Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:51 pm

MTIceman41 wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.


Why thank you!
Been six years last time I set on of these up...don't judge the edit totals :lol:

Early excuses for the 36-0 victory?
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby MTIceman41 on Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:02 pm

iAmCaffeine wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.


Why thank you!
Been six years last time I set on of these up...don't judge the edit totals :lol:

Early excuses for the 36-0 victory?

Lost to FOED by 1 game when I was with MYTH 7yrs ago...they are good, should be very competitive.
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby iAmCaffeine on Sat Apr 29, 2017 7:24 am

I was just referencing your editing skills. FOED are good indeed.
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby JPlo64 on Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:34 am

MTIceman41 wrote:Great starting battle between S&M and FOED: GL everyone :D
CLICK ME

show: Contacts

show: Start Date

show: Rules of Engagement

show: Maps Allowed

show: SandM Home Games

show: FOED Home Games

show: tiebreaker

show: SandM Player Count

show: FOED Player Count

show: Ranking Confirmation


FOED Agrees
User avatar
Major JPlo64
 
Posts: 1552
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:38 pm
Location: Kentucky
42

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby MTIceman41 on Sun May 07, 2017 4:08 pm

Updated...S&M home maps created, sent out, and under link
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby MTIceman41 on Wed May 10, 2017 8:47 pm

All games created and joined.
All player counts are within rules.
Most common quote: Why are all the maps sunny? :lol:

GL all, it will be a close one
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby IcePack on Wed May 10, 2017 8:51 pm

MTIceman41 wrote:Most common quote: Why are all the maps sunny? :lol:


I got this quite a bit on our set too lol
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
User avatar
Major IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16631
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (1) vs (0) FOED out of 21

Postby MTIceman41 on Sun May 14, 2017 11:27 am

First blood: Game 17423063
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby Conchobar on Sun May 28, 2017 2:05 am

MTIceman41 wrote:Lost to FOED by 1 game when I was with MYTH 7yrs ago...they are good, should be very competitive.


A very different clan to 7 years ago. But our current form ain't too shabby either. ;)

This wee war is looking VERY close and could go either way. It is definitely squeeze your bum time... [-o<
Image
User avatar
Colonel Conchobar
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:18 am
Location: Tír na nÓg

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby MTIceman41 on Sun May 28, 2017 7:21 pm

Conchobar wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:Lost to FOED by 1 game when I was with MYTH 7yrs ago...they are good, should be very competitive.


A very different clan to 7 years ago. But our current form ain't too shabby either. ;)

This wee war is looking VERY close and could go either way. It is definitely squeeze your bum time... [-o<


Solid clan then, and solid now...hell no not another 1 game loss...

Actium/CM will be the deciders IMO...11-10 likely outcome...could be 12-9
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby Conchobar on Mon May 29, 2017 2:23 am

MTIceman41 wrote:
Conchobar wrote:Actium/CM will be the deciders IMO...11-10 likely outcome...could be 12-9


I agree, 11-10 it will likely be. Personally, I'm not a fan of your unlimted games, but hopefully at least one will go our way... [-o<
Image
User avatar
Colonel Conchobar
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:18 am
Location: Tír na nÓg

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby Fyrdraca on Tue May 30, 2017 11:14 pm

Conchobar wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:
Conchobar wrote:Actium/CM will be the deciders IMO...11-10 likely outcome...could be 12-9


I agree, 11-10 it will likely be. Personally, I'm not a fan of your unlimted games, but hopefully at least one will go our way... [-o<


While neither game is definitely over yet, we are going to need help from the dice to have chance in either. Honestly I think we played the Conquer Man game about as well as we could have going second. I'm sure we could have made some slightly better moves here and there, but I feel pretty good about our play.

As for Actium, ugh. I realized a round too late (which of course in unlimited is huge) that our strat wasn't the right one for the particular game settings. I will say that we did have some bad rolls at crucial times, but not enough to completely change the outcome. Going first however and having a sizable lead early on, if we lose I'm gonna stew on that for a while.

Regardless, I think we gave josko and company a tough fight in both games, and I'd be interested to hear their assessment of our competition.

Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D
User avatar
Colonel Fyrdraca
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 11:39 am
Location: Missouri, USA
3232

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (9) vs (8) FOED out of 21

Postby iAmCaffeine on Mon Jun 05, 2017 9:47 am

Looks like S&M will have this by 1 or 2 games depending on North America.
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby JPlo64 on Mon Jun 05, 2017 12:57 pm

Fyrdraca wrote:Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D

It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)
User avatar
Major JPlo64
 
Posts: 1552
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:38 pm
Location: Kentucky
42

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby MTIceman41 on Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:18 pm

JPlo64 wrote:
Fyrdraca wrote:Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D

It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)


Very possible...damn good battle and I expected this to be a close one
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby iAmCaffeine on Mon Jun 05, 2017 2:53 pm

MTIceman41 wrote:
JPlo64 wrote:
Fyrdraca wrote:Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D

It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)


Very possible...damn good battle and I expected this to be a close one

One of you will knock the other out of the loser's bracket in a couple rounds.
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Postby JPlo64 on Wed Jun 14, 2017 8:43 pm

iAmCaffeine wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:
JPlo64 wrote:
Fyrdraca wrote:Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D

It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)


Very possible...damn good battle and I expected this to be a close one

One of you will knock the other out of the loser's bracket in a couple rounds.

:lol:
(If you don't get it, look at the bracket ;) )
User avatar
Major JPlo64
 
Posts: 1552
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:38 pm
Location: Kentucky
42

Re: [MWC4r] Rd 1: S&M (12) vs (9) FOED out of 21 S&M WINS

Postby MTIceman41 on Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:02 am

All games completed 12-9 final score.
Image
User avatar
Colonel MTIceman41
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4r]S&M (12) vs (9) FOED - S&M WINS - Final 6/18

Postby groovysmurf on Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:03 pm

Privileges removed, databases updated, topic moved.
User avatar
Major groovysmurf
Head Clan Director
Head Clan Director
 
Posts: 2538
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:28 pm
Location: Cleveland, OH


Return to Complete Challenges

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users