Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
concrete wrote:REALLY???????
What am I missing here? Why is this a problem for you or anyone else? Who is it bothering if a player has a sig 2 or 3 times the size of someone else? I must be missing the reason behind this. Sounds like a dumb complaint to me.
Beast Of Burson wrote:concrete wrote:REALLY???????
What am I missing here? Why is this a problem for you or anyone else? Who is it bothering if a player has a sig 2 or 3 times the size of someone else? I must be missing the reason behind this. Sounds like a dumb complaint to me.
That is what happens when you put children in charge. Goes straight to their tiny brains. If he spent as much time trying to get a woman as he does being useless on here, he would actually lose his virginity.
concrete wrote:REALLY???????
What am I missing here? Why is this a problem for you or anyone else? Who is it bothering if a player has a sig 2 or 3 times the size of someone else? I must be missing the reason behind this. Sounds like a dumb complaint to me.
Beast Of Burson wrote:That is what happens when you put children in charge.
CC RULES wrote:
- Signature images larger than 150 pixels high by 600 pixels wide just scream āI am compensating for somethingā and should be reduced in size. Note the dimensions size restriction is only in reference to the image. You may also have 2 additional levels of text / spoilers. In the spoiler below are some examples of acceptable signature configurations
owenshooter wrote:concrete wrote:REALLY???????
What am I missing here? Why is this a problem for you or anyone else? Who is it bothering if a player has a sig 2 or 3 times the size of someone else? I must be missing the reason behind this. Sounds like a dumb complaint to me.
yeah, this is a real issue and there is an actual rule about the size of sigs. so, it is not a dumb complaint.
when sigs are larger than allowed, they clog the forum, they ruin the forum experience, they are ANNOYING. i agree 100% with icepack, because it is an actual RULE that the site has gotten away from enforcing. the site needs to get back to enforcing the rule, because the forums are becoming overrun with them... the black jesus has spoken...-JĆ©sus noir
Lord Arioch wrote:Question
why is it even possible to load a sig larger than allowed?
Witt13 wrote:So I don't have a signature, never have, and therefore don't have a dog in the fight. But IMO, shouldn't this be treated similar to the whole "foed" tool. If someone annoys you, you are permitted to foe them. If someone's sig annoys you (too big, makes the page to slow to load, doesn't load/look right on your phone), turn off sigs.
Control Panel --> Board Preferences --> Edit Display Options --> Display Signatures Yes/No
Mine has been set to 'No', and therefore is never a problem. No issues with the forums on my phone downloading, etc.
I understand if there is a rule in place against the size (which I personally wasn't aware of), but this to me seems to be a big fuss over something really not that big of a deal. My two cents.
mrswdk wrote:What about people like Chapcrap, whose sig is the right size but an annoying color?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users