[CC6] R3 LHDD vs FOED 27-22 Final 08/15

by **Momo33** on Sun May 29, 2016 6:24 am

Round 3 of the CC6. FOED and LHDD face each other for a spot in the semis! 2 clans who are performing very well in the last months and it should give a clash of the titans in this 1/4 final of the most prestigious clan event on CC. Good luck to both clans!

Clan Contact;
LHDD: Momo33
FOED: uckuki

War:

show

Settings:

show

FOED
LHDD
Round 1

Tie-break: Game 16634586 Classic LHDD

LHDD home 7 - 7

show

FOED Home 6 - 8

show

Round 2

LHDD home 7 - 3

show

FOED home 6 - 4

show

Players usage
LHDD

show

by **Conchobar** on Sun May 29, 2016 7:40 am

Bonjour Hussards. Don't worry about this yet.
Just focus on winning a couple of those RL games against S&M like good little dragons. :mrgreen:

by **betiko** on Sun May 29, 2016 2:45 pm

Conchobar wrote:Bonjour Hussards. Don't worry about this yet.
Just focus on winning a couple of those RL games against S&M like good little dragons.

sorry but what grabs our attention right now is the 1 game agaisnt TOFU we need to win to become CL7 champions

42 pages of cl7 in our forum... 11 pages of RL, most of which was the discussion wether or not we should play it and to try to find players to fill in games each round..
What do you guys need, us to tie? Just checked we are losing 5-1. If you need us to win, it looks pretty much dead, sorry guys!

by **JPlo64** on Sun May 29, 2016 4:45 pm

betiko wrote:
Conchobar wrote:Bonjour Hussards. Don't worry about this yet.
Just focus on winning a couple of those RL games against S&M like good little dragons.

sorry but what grabs our attention right now is the 1 game agaisnt TOFU we need to win to become CL7 champions

42 pages of cl7 in our forum... 11 pages of RL, most of which was the discussion wether or not we should play it and to try to find players to fill in games each round..
What do you guys need, us to tie? Just checked we are losing 5-1. If you need us to win, it looks pretty much dead, sorry guys!

We just need you to win 2 games!

by **The_Samurai** on Mon May 30, 2016 1:41 am

Momo wrote "Round 3 of the CC6. OSA and LHDD face each other".

I guess you mean FOED, not OSA. Not good to copy and paste ;-)

by **Conchobar** on Mon May 30, 2016 2:28 am

betiko wrote:What do you guys need, us to tie? Just checked we are losing 5-1. If you need us to win, it looks pretty much dead, sorry guys!

Wow, you really haven't been paying attention. It has been a very strong and enjoyable Random League this year.
FOED and S&M have been neck and neck at the top of the table since the beginning.
And now it all comes down to the size of S&M's inevitable win over LHDD.

To quote my good friend JPlo, who so eloquently put it:

JPlo64 wrote:Just need LHDD to not Totally shit the bed and its ours

That's right JP. We just need LHDD to not achieve the biggest losing margin of any match, in any week, in the entire league.
You can lose 2-10 for all we care. In fact, that is looking quite likely... :-({|=

I do hope you're going to put up more of a fight in this upcoming cup match? :-#

by **betiko** on Mon May 30, 2016 3:52 am

Conchobar wrote:
betiko wrote:What do you guys need, us to tie? Just checked we are losing 5-1. If you need us to win, it looks pretty much dead, sorry guys!

Wow, you really haven't been paying attention. It has been a very strong and enjoyable Random League this year.
FOED and S&M have been neck and neck at the top of the table since the beginning.
And now it all comes down to the size of S&M's inevitable win over LHDD.

To quote my good friend JPlo, who so eloquently put it:
JPlo64 wrote:Just need LHDD to not Totally shit the bed and its ours

That's right JP. We just need LHDD to not achieve the biggest losing margin of any match, in any week, in the entire league.
You can lose 2-10 for all we care. In fact, that is looking quite likely...

I do hope you're going to put up more of a fight in this upcoming cup match?

wow so you just need us to win 1 out of 6

I have no idea of how things are going in the 6 games left, I see on a dubs we have a player eliminated so I guess it has to be a victory on the other 5... It could be pretty cool to have the CL7 division 1 champion and the RL champion facing each other for a spot in semi finals!

Half of the clan didn't reall want to participate in the RL, the other did, so we basically used it to try teams and newly added players. I personally didn't play a single game and haven't followed at all our RL results, we kind of put all our attention in the CL7. I think it's hard to do well in both given that they are played at the same period of time, you need to pick one!

So you guys have finished all your game, and are champions if we win 1/6 remaining games against S&M?

by **betiko** on Mon May 30, 2016 3:59 am

just had a look:

this one looks like a win:
https://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=16570643

wow we might finish 10-2, that's embarassing... :lol:

while our CL7 fate relies in this game:

https://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=16458427

by **-1-1-3-** on Mon May 30, 2016 4:37 am

Hi, Foed.

by **Conchobar** on Mon May 30, 2016 4:54 am

-1-1-3- wrote:Hi, Foed.

Hello, -1-1-3-. Are you a droid?

betiko wrote:. It could be pretty cool to have the CL7 division 1 champion and the RL champion facing each other for a spot in semi finals!

Actually, that's true, it would.
Okay, you've got a deal betiko. We'll cheer for you guys in NZ if your gang just win one more game against S&M.
f*ck them, the Fallen and TOFU anyway. :twisted:

by **Mishalex** on Mon May 30, 2016 5:38 am

Conchobar wrote:
-1-1-3- wrote:Hi, Foed.

Hello, -1-1-3-. Are you a droid?

betiko wrote:. It could be pretty cool to have the CL7 division 1 champion and the RL champion facing each other for a spot in semi finals!

Actually, that's true, it would.
Okay, you've got a deal betiko. We'll cheer for you guys in NZ if your gang just win one more game against S&M.
f*ck them, the Fallen and TOFU anyway.

Actually, we are close to take 1982...

by **Momo33** on Mon May 30, 2016 11:04 am

Sorry for the copy/paste guys, everything should be in order in the 1st post now. And the dates have been updated. Waiting for FOED's approval to ask for privs.

by **uckuki** on Mon May 30, 2016 2:13 pm

FOED is in

gl and hfa

by **Lindax** on Mon May 30, 2016 4:22 pm

Sorry guys:

There will be no round limits except on trench games where we will permit round limits on big maps such as USA 2.1, Hive, etc.

Round limits on Trench games are not permitted:

There will be no round limits except for “no forts” games (No forts games must have a 30 round limit)

This rule is NOT negotiable.

Please let me know when the OP is changed, so I can approve this war.

Lx

by **betiko** on Mon May 30, 2016 6:03 pm

Lindax wrote:Sorry guys:

There will be no round limits except on trench games where we will permit round limits on big maps such as USA 2.1, Hive, etc.

Round limits on Trench games are not permitted:

There will be no round limits except for “no forts” games (No forts games must have a 30 round limit)

This rule is NOT negotiable.

Please let me know when the OP is changed, so I can approve this war.

Lx

can you explain why? An escalating trench parachute game can be completely endless. I don't see one single good reason not to accept round limits other than "that's what was decided before the competition started and we didn't really think it through"

by **Lindax** on Mon May 30, 2016 6:36 pm

betiko wrote:
Lindax wrote:Sorry guys:

There will be no round limits except on trench games where we will permit round limits on big maps such as USA 2.1, Hive, etc.

Round limits on Trench games are not permitted:

There will be no round limits except for “no forts” games (No forts games must have a 30 round limit)

This rule is NOT negotiable.

Please let me know when the OP is changed, so I can approve this war.

Lx

can you explain why? An escalating trench parachute game can be completely endless. I don't see one single good reason not to accept round limits other than "that's what was decided before the competition started and we didn't really think it through"

Thanks for your sarcasm. This rule was decided after a lengthy discussion the CDF forum. I did not invent it. If anybody didn't think it through, blame it on the clan leaders.

Lx

by **Momo33** on Mon May 30, 2016 7:10 pm

Lindax wrote:
betiko wrote:
Lindax wrote:Sorry guys:

There will be no round limits except on trench games where we will permit round limits on big maps such as USA 2.1, Hive, etc.

Round limits on Trench games are not permitted:

There will be no round limits except for “no forts” games (No forts games must have a 30 round limit)

This rule is NOT negotiable.

Please let me know when the OP is changed, so I can approve this war.

Lx

can you explain why? An escalating trench parachute game can be completely endless. I don't see one single good reason not to accept round limits other than "that's what was decided before the competition started and we didn't really think it through"

Thanks for your sarcasm. This rule was decided after a lengthy discussion the CDF forum. I did not invent it. If anybody didn't think it through, blame it on the clan leaders.

Lx

PM sent. Don't want an escalation here.

by **betiko** on Tue May 31, 2016 1:22 am

Lindax wrote:
betiko wrote:
Lindax wrote:Sorry guys:

There will be no round limits except on trench games where we will permit round limits on big maps such as USA 2.1, Hive, etc.

Round limits on Trench games are not permitted:

There will be no round limits except for “no forts” games (No forts games must have a 30 round limit)

This rule is NOT negotiable.

Please let me know when the OP is changed, so I can approve this war.

Lx

can you explain why? An escalating trench parachute game can be completely endless. I don't see one single good reason not to accept round limits other than "that's what was decided before the competition started and we didn't really think it through"

Thanks for your sarcasm. This rule was decided after a lengthy discussion the CDF forum. I did not invent it. If anybody didn't think it through, blame it on the clan leaders.

Lx

I wasn't blaming you for the rule, more for the part saying it can't be discussed.
To give a real world example, in formula 1 this season they started changing the qualifying method inventing a new method that looked good on the paper. It was a total fiasco in reality, there were a lot of protests and they changed it back to the previous qualifying method.
We got stuck in a escalating trench last round, and we had to resign otherwise that game would ve still got going for a year. Escalating trench should become forbidden or a round limit has to be put in place for those games.

Ps: max verstappen is a hell of a driver!

by **Momo33** on Tue May 31, 2016 6:14 am

Since this rule seems to be non negotiable, we will be playing this war without round limit even if I have big reserves on this rule. I would not be surprised to see this war never ends since we know that both clans will put big maps with trench. Sadly we can't change rule in the middle of the competition.

Lindax is everything ok now?

by **Lindax** on Tue May 31, 2016 8:43 am

Yes, everything ok now, approved.

Lx

Momo33 wrote:Round 3 of the CC6. FOED and LHDD face each other for a spot in the semis! 2 clans who are performing very well in the last moths are should give a clash of the titan in this 1/4 final of the most prestigious clan event on CC. Good luck to both clans!

Clan Contact;
LHDD: Momo33
FOED: uckuki

War:
show

Settings:
show

FOED
LHDD
Round 1

Tie-break:

LHDD home 0 - 0
show

FOED Home 0 - 0
show

Round 2

LHDD home 0 - 0
show

FOED home 0 - 0
show