Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
A scummy one. Or a scum who maintains his innocence despite his own death.spinwizard wrote:well done, u killed a bodyguard
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
No problem, bro... Take your time.Puff wrote:Anarkistsdream,
I will be out of action until Monday because I have real life things happening.
I don't know if you want to replace me or not but I will be able to play again on Monday.
Sorry
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
That feels like typical scum wishwash.I GOT SERVED wrote:Well, I think you gave a good defense. But frankly, you still look scummier than anybody else right now.
Luis Buñuel wrote:In the name of hypocrites,
doctors have invented the most exquisite form of
torture ever known to man: survival.
Yeah, you're grasping at straws.Colaalone wrote:A quick re-read gives me the impression IGS and Puff are scum.
That feels like typical scum wishwash.I GOT SERVED wrote:Well, I think you gave a good defense. But frankly, you still look scummier than anybody else right now.
VOTE: IGS
Am I grasping at straws? Yeah sure but there really isnt much to go on.

Your post does not make it look random at all.I GOT SERVED wrote:Yeah, you're grasping at straws.Colaalone wrote:A quick re-read gives me the impression IGS and Puff are scum.
That feels like typical scum wishwash.I GOT SERVED wrote:Well, I think you gave a good defense. But frankly, you still look scummier than anybody else right now.
VOTE: IGS
Am I grasping at straws? Yeah sure but there really isnt much to go on.
Firstly, that was a day one vote. Day one is always random. I voted him because anybody lynched day one (with the exception of this game) is better than a no lynch. Usually I'm inclined to believe people unless I have a gut feeling that they're scum. Hence, I voted him.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.

SO WHAT? We all thought he was scum, we thought it was a good lead. When there is a good lead, do you ignore it and take another path? NO! You're post also said his bad defense was good. It seems like a scum post.I GOT SERVED wrote:I was stating a general fact that day one is random. There was a lead on jnd, so I went with it. He turned up the vig. You could point an FOS at anyone who voted for jnd, and they'd be just as guilty as me.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Sorry, lemme clear this up. I didn't want to vote him so soon, in the hopes that some else might have developed. Hence my waiting.Fircoal wrote: NO! You're post also said his bad defense was good. It seems like a scum post.

sorry, but I do that a lot so. HA!I GOT SERVED wrote:Sorry, lemme clear this up. I didn't want to vote him so soon, in the hopes that some else might have developed. Hence my waiting.Fircoal wrote: NO! You're post also said his bad defense was good. It seems like a scum post.
And in this case, it's "your" nor "you're" [/nitpick]
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.