Cleared rustin & DNelson possible multis or secret diplomacy [ka]

[VicFontaine]

(I'm not absolutely certain, but strongly suspicious).

Accused:

DNelson
rustin

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):

Game 16028944

Comments:
I hope neither of the above is actually cheating, and this is not at all due to me being on the short end at the moment (game is esc., so could change anytime), but whereas:

1) Neither will respond in chat to general game comments nor to questions regarding their actions, which are (at least) questionable to me
2) Neither has attacked the other from the opening round except, essentially, to get to me

Therefore, I'm wondering if they're a multi or engaged in illegal diplomacy.

[Donelladan]

It's a 3 player game, round 15.
If they were gangging up on you, you'll be dead since a long time.

Also, this is there first game together.

According to the log you've had more bonus than them for most of the game, that's a good reason to attack you, and you said yourself you have been very agressiv ( strategically speaking) therefore they probably attacked you mainly as a response.

Ignoring the chat is smthg that often happen.

Just so you know, you wanna report people, you need more evidence. Either many games player together with always one of them winning. Or if you gonna report them for only one game, it has to be very obvious. This is everything but obvious to me.

[VicFontaine]

Like I said, I don't have anything clear, which is why I suspected them of possible secret diplomacy.

But point taken! Thanks.

[owenshooter]

It's a 3 player game, round 15.
If they were gangging up on you, you'll be dead since a long time.

Also, this is there first game together.

According to the log you've had more bonus than them for most of the game, that's a good reason to attack you, and you said yourself you have been very agressiv ( strategically speaking) therefore they probably attacked you mainly as a response.

Ignoring the chat is smthg that often happen.

Just so you know, you wanna report people, you need more evidence. Either many games player together with always one of them winning. Or if you gonna report them for only one game, it has to be very obvious. This is everything but obvious to me.

these are all things that people usually look into before filing a complaint... the whole not having played together, EVER, is the big one for me... toss is a sprinkling of the OP having the lead the entire match, and you wonder why he even filed this. as far as comments, in standard games, i rarely look, unless i know the player. i don't believe in truces and am not interested in the chat, i just want to rule the world... the black jesus sees nothing at all here, kids... move along...-Jésus noir

[king achilles]

I agree with the analysis said here. It is likely that as they attacked you, they were also focused on establishing a bonus area and now you are left in the middle of the map, which is not a good location especially in a 3 player game. Anyway, as per your report, they are not multis and it's hard to establish a secret alliance between them with what we currently have.