Battle Royal Week Game [POLL]

Gilligan · Post by **Gilligan** » Wed May 30, 2007 7:21 pm

I think it would be nice to have one person, an active person on CC everyday, to start a Battle Royale on the first on every month (or every other month, etc.) This would give others chances that haven't had the good fortune to join a Battle Royale and have really wanted to, since they know when it will start. What do you guys think?

happy2seeyou · Post by **happy2seeyou** » Wed May 30, 2007 7:26 pm

That would be up to Death to All. I personally think that if they were held all the time, then they wouldn't be as special. But that is just me.

Gilligan · Post by **Gilligan** » Wed May 30, 2007 7:27 pm

It wouldn't have to be all of the time. It could be every 3 or 4 months.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed May 30, 2007 7:43 pm

IC and I had a 2-player Battle Royale last night.

AAFitz · Post by **AAFitz** » Wed May 30, 2007 7:46 pm

wicked wrote:IC and I had a 2-player Battle Royale last night.

how long did it take D2All to set it up for you?

AAFitz · Post by **AAFitz** » Wed May 30, 2007 7:47 pm

happy2seeyou wrote:That would be up to Death to All. I personally think that if they were held all the time, then they wouldn't be as special. But that is just me.

no, no, no....too much...............is never enough

Gilligan · Post by **Gilligan** » Wed May 30, 2007 7:58 pm

wicked wrote:IC and I had a 2-player Battle Royale last night.

Wicked, what is your serious opinion on this?

And, this may be a stupid question, but who is IC?

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Wed May 30, 2007 8:02 pm

Gilligan wrote:
wicked wrote:IC and I had a 2-player Battle Royale last night.
Wicked, what is your serious opinion on this?

And, this may be a stupid question, but who is IC?

I think it's AK…

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed May 30, 2007 8:03 pm

whatever D2A wants. I don't care.

AAFitz · Post by **AAFitz** » Wed May 30, 2007 8:11 pm

wicked wrote:whatever D2A wants. I don't care.

the four person games confuse her, get her in a game with 100 more, and she'll have a stroke

its Ok wicked...they have 2 player games now...

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Wed May 30, 2007 8:16 pm

I don't see what the big deal is... 100 players, 99 losers, 1 winner. Rough estimate

I prefer D2A being all secretive about when he makes a new one, it keeps people on their toes and causes mass paranoia in the Callouts forum.
If you didn't get in, suck it up and be more prepared for the next one.
If you did get in, you're most likely going to lose anyway so it's not a big deal.

AAFitz · Post by **AAFitz** » Wed May 30, 2007 8:33 pm

AK_iceman wrote:I don't see what the big deal is... 100 players, 99 losers, 1 winner. Rough estimate

I prefer D2A being all secretive about when he makes a new one, it keeps people on their toes and causes mass paranoia in the Callouts forum.
If you didn't get in, suck it up and be more prepared for the next one.
If you did get in, you're most likely going to lose anyway so it's not a big deal.

it cost me $20...that i offered to the one who pmed me first...4 people pmed me...only the first wanted the cash...ie premium

sully800 · Post by **sully800** » Wed May 30, 2007 9:42 pm

Gilligan wrote:And, this may be a stupid question, but who is IC?

IC = icey = AK icey man

RobinJ · Post by **RobinJ** » Thu May 31, 2007 7:44 am

sully800 wrote:
Gilligan wrote:And, this may be a stupid question, but who is IC?
IC = icey = AK icey man

I see the light.

Anyway, what's with the avatars wicked and AK/IC?

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Thu May 31, 2007 8:17 am

I lost an avatar gamble game. Can you guess who beat me?

AAFitz · Post by **AAFitz** » Thu May 31, 2007 8:22 am

AK_iceman wrote:I lost an avatar gamble game. Can you guess who beat me?

benji???

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Thu May 31, 2007 9:04 am

wicked wrote:IC and I had a 2-player Battle Royale last night.

Something tells me this was not exactly on the CC site?!

C.

max is gr8 · Post by **max is gr8** » Thu May 31, 2007 1:34 pm

Maybe make it not a D2A exclusive 3 reasons why

1) why should they be one offs I want them to happen every day
2) I pmed lack the idea in January last year and he said that he'ld think about it
3) Why not

Gilligan · Post by **Gilligan** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:58 am

alex_white101 · Post by **alex_white101** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 10:16 am

AAFitz wrote:
AK_iceman wrote:I don't see what the big deal is... 100 players, 99 losers, 1 winner. Rough estimate

I prefer D2A being all secretive about when he makes a new one, it keeps people on their toes and causes mass paranoia in the Callouts forum.
If you didn't get in, suck it up and be more prepared for the next one.
If you did get in, you're most likely going to lose anyway so it's not a big deal.
it cost me $20...that i offered to the one who pmed me first...4 people pmed me...only the first wanted the cash...ie premium

did u make any points from it?

i think they should have an assassin battle royale! it would be incredibly funny and lucrative for one lucky lucky player.

max is gr8 · Post by **max is gr8** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 10:20 am

I think they should be public and no new recruits can either- Make or Play in them

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 10:31 am

alex_white101 wrote:
AAFitz wrote:
AK_iceman wrote:I don't see what the big deal is... 100 players, 99 losers, 1 winner. Rough estimate

I prefer D2A being all secretive about when he makes a new one, it keeps people on their toes and causes mass paranoia in the Callouts forum.
If you didn't get in, suck it up and be more prepared for the next one.
If you did get in, you're most likely going to lose anyway so it's not a big deal.
it cost me $20...that i offered to the one who pmed me first...4 people pmed me...only the first wanted the cash...ie premium
did u make any points from it?

i think they should have an assassin battle royale! it would be incredibly funny and lucrative for one lucky lucky player.

that would be madness, especially since no-one has a clue what colour there target would be

alex_white101 · Post by **alex_white101** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 10:38 am

nagerous wrote:
alex_white101 wrote:
AAFitz wrote:
AK_iceman wrote:I don't see what the big deal is... 100 players, 99 losers, 1 winner. Rough estimate

I prefer D2A being all secretive about when he makes a new one, it keeps people on their toes and causes mass paranoia in the Callouts forum.
If you didn't get in, suck it up and be more prepared for the next one.
If you did get in, you're most likely going to lose anyway so it's not a big deal.
it cost me $20...that i offered to the one who pmed me first...4 people pmed me...only the first wanted the cash...ie premium
did u make any points from it?

i think they should have an assassin battle royale! it would be incredibly funny and lucrative for one lucky lucky player.

that would be madness, especially since no-one has a clue what colour there target would be

exactly! all the experienced players would be scared to attack for fear of eliminating another persons target, whereas the relative newbs to the site would attack straight off and make someone gain an incredible amount of points for nothing! imagine if you were that lucky guy........

max is gr8 · Post by **max is gr8** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 10:56 am

over time people would deadbeat leving the patient people a real game

crzyblue · Post by **crzyblue** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:25 am

Suggestion Idea: Monthly BR games

Specifics: every month have 1 BR game and make it the first week of every month

Why it is needed: Bring more fun and excitement to CC

ps: added option, if you win a BR then you can't join another for 2 months, starting with the next month, leaving them 90 days to lose points they gained

Battle Royal Week Game [POLL]

Do you want to see every week one battle royal game?

Scheduling Battle Royales

Monthly BR games