rockfist wrote:Fallen is currently under-rated imo
I believe I said Fallen was pretty good, because their current rating is decent and I was saying they are under-rated.
Moderator: Clan Directors
rockfist wrote:Fallen is currently under-rated imo
Donelladan wrote:LHDD doesn't belong to the top 10 Clans of All time for sure.
Our rise in the top 10 is way too recent to put us in the top 10 of all time, and we did not achieve anything yet.
Let talk about LHDD after the end of the CC5, or better after CC6, then maybe we'll see if our clan deserve to be discussed in this topic.
Otherwise I didn't know about clan world at the time THOTA, ACE or EMP were playing and wouldn't be able to give a judgement on those.
Only clan surprising me in Bruce's top 10 is LoW, no offence guys, but since I am following the clan world I haven't seen LoW beating any big clans or doing so well.
iAmCaffeine wrote:Keefie wrote:It's not really about accomplishments is it. It's about what clans at their peak were in the top 10.
The Pack most certainly achieved that. LHDD are getting there but would they beat the best Pack ever, I doubt it.
Also there's lot's of bigging up LHDD from certain quarters, but the Fallen are at least as good if not better and they've hardly had a mention. Plus the Fallen were getting great results at a time when LHDD were being beaten by HH
K
Do you actually think PACK at their best would beat LHDD? Which clan would you even put betiko in anyway?
There's a lot of bigging up for Fallen from other quarters, I wouldn't worry too much. Half of this thread has been people just bigging up their own clan anyway, although the rest is an interesting read. Fallen have been around longer than LHDD, so that would make sense. Not many clans would be beaten by HH nowadays, but I'd say LHDD and Fallen are roughly on the same level right now. Fallen have had their ups and downs over the past couple of years whereas LHDD have pretty much gone from strength to strength.
rockfist wrote:betiko wrote:rockfist wrote:Fallen is currently under-rated imo
KORT isn't playing up to their usual standards, but until they lose they aren't as low as fifth.
Well they are as low as 5th or so in the clan league... Barely winning half of their games. They definitely lost most key players and are the shadows of themselves. Legion is giving them a real hard time in the cc5. Just go look at lhdd and fallen results over the past year and half or so.. We are definitely in a better shape than kort.
I guess the question is, would you want to play them in your next round? If you would, then fine. If you'd rather not face them, then that says something, doesn't it?
Keefie wrote:It's not really about accomplishments is it. It's about what clans at their peak were in the top 10.
The Pack most certainly achieved that. LHDD are getting there but would they beat the best Pack ever, I doubt it.
Also there's lot's of bigging up LHDD from certain quarters, but the Fallen are at least as good if not better and they've hardly had a mention. Plus the Fallen were getting great results at a time when LHDD were being beaten by HH
K
iAmCaffeine wrote:Keefie wrote:It's not really about accomplishments is it. It's about what clans at their peak were in the top 10.
The Pack most certainly achieved that. LHDD are getting there but would they beat the best Pack ever, I doubt it.
Also there's lot's of bigging up LHDD from certain quarters, but the Fallen are at least as good if not better and they've hardly had a mention. Plus the Fallen were getting great results at a time when LHDD were being beaten by HH
K
Do you actually think PACK at their best would beat LHDD? Which clan would you even put betiko in anyway?
There's a lot of bigging up for Fallen from other quarters, I wouldn't worry too much. Half of this thread has been people just bigging up their own clan anyway, although the rest is an interesting read. Fallen have been around longer than LHDD, so that would make sense. Not many clans would be beaten by HH nowadays, but I'd say LHDD and Fallen are roughly on the same level right now. Fallen have had their ups and downs over the past couple of years whereas LHDD have pretty much gone from strength to strength.
betiko wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Keefie wrote:It's not really about accomplishments is it. It's about what clans at their peak were in the top 10.
The Pack most certainly achieved that. LHDD are getting there but would they beat the best Pack ever, I doubt it.
Also there's lot's of bigging up LHDD from certain quarters, but the Fallen are at least as good if not better and they've hardly had a mention. Plus the Fallen were getting great results at a time when LHDD were being beaten by HH
K
Do you actually think PACK at their best would beat LHDD? Which clan would you even put betiko in anyway?
There's a lot of bigging up for Fallen from other quarters, I wouldn't worry too much. Half of this thread has been people just bigging up their own clan anyway, although the rest is an interesting read. Fallen have been around longer than LHDD, so that would make sense. Not many clans would be beaten by HH nowadays, but I'd say LHDD and Fallen are roughly on the same level right now. Fallen have had their ups and downs over the past couple of years whereas LHDD have pretty much gone from strength to strength.
actually LHDD is 4 years old and fallen is 3 years old
LHDD was very decent at first winning its 4-5 first wars then it became mediocre for some time. Fallen never fell in the mediocre spectrum.
BGtheBrain wrote:TNC demands an asterisk to be included as an honorable mention in this list....
please...
iAmCaffeine wrote:Donelladan wrote:LHDD doesn't belong to the top 10 Clans of All time for sure.
Our rise in the top 10 is way too recent to put us in the top 10 of all time, and we did not achieve anything yet.
Let talk about LHDD after the end of the CC5, or better after CC6, then maybe we'll see if our clan deserve to be discussed in this topic.
Otherwise I didn't know about clan world at the time THOTA, ACE or EMP were playing and wouldn't be able to give a judgement on those.
Only clan surprising me in Bruce's top 10 is LoW, no offence guys, but since I am following the clan world I haven't seen LoW beating any big clans or doing so well.
Maybe not top ten of all time, but currently without a doubt. I guess the way you would rank top ten of all time in sports is by the most titles, so perhaps this is how it should be done.
Legends of War used to be one of the big boys, top three along with THOTA and TSM I think, maybe IA too, before times started changing. The founders of TOFU were previously in LoW; CoF, Velve etc.
Keefie wrote:Great list Angola until number 10. There have been many many clans better that BPB.
angola wrote:Keefie wrote:Great list Angola until number 10. There have been many many clans better that BPB.
Perhaps. They were terrible at organization, but man, when they had their full complement of players they were extremely stout.
Bruceswar wrote:BPB in their prime was good. Top 10, maybe so, but not all time.
Here is a top ten list of clans based on their top prime clan. If you had one war to play how each clan would rank. This means each clan at 100%. Best players and fully focused. This does not mean that any higher rank would auto beat any other clan lower, but just a likely hood of it happening.
1. KORT
2. THOTA
3. LOW
4. TOFU
5. TSM
6. ID
7. IA
8. ACE
9. AOC
10. EMP
Clans that are very close. (In No Order)
PACK
NEM
TUC (The Untouchables)
FOED
OSA
Before everybody starts jumping on me for ID, they were a beast back in 2007 and played THOTA to a standstill over 60 games, which they added 40 more games. Any thoughts?
iAmCaffeine wrote:I'm pretty sure Nemesis players are everywhere now.
Keefie wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:I'm pretty sure Nemesis players are everywhere now.
A lot of their players started Optisani. Psychobkrazy and Leapfrog joined HH.
rockfist wrote:I'm curious, when you rank a clan based on its best players, does that mean you could have someone from 2011-2012 and someone from 2014-2015? Or does that mean you are ranking the clan based on the players in it when the clan was at its all time best? Meaning if the clan was weaker 2 years ago than today, but had an awesome player who is no longer in it, that player would not count.
I'm not trying to argue anyone is right or wrong, just trying to understand.
Keefie wrote:angola wrote:Keefie wrote:Great list Angola until number 10. There have been many many clans better that BPB.
Perhaps. They were terrible at organization, but man, when they had their full complement of players they were extremely stout.
With a war record of played 7 won 2 ??? Obviously they are the sexiest clan of all time, but I don't think too many folk would put them in their top 20, let alone top 10.
khazalid wrote:and verily, the clanscene was without form and light, and the shooter said: let there be signatures and shtick, an lo, there appeared signatures and shtick, and he saw that it was, err, good.
is that right?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users