Narkasurthedemon - being a multi [ka]

by **bandit1986** on Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:21 am

Accused:

Narkasurthedemon

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Game number(s): 15011160

Comments: This guy is out to a huge lead in this game and has a border of his biggest territory bonus with no troops on it with a fellow non-paying member that is ranked as a private and joined the game at about the same time he did. Would like you to check out whether this is because of secret diplomacy or being a multi.

by **iAmCaffeine** on Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:46 am

bandit1986 wrote:Accused:

Narkasurthedemon

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Game number(s): Game 15011160

Comments: This guy is out to a huge lead in this game and has a border of his biggest territory bonus with no troops on it with a fellow non-paying member that is ranked as a private and joined the game at about the same time he did. Would like you to check out whether this is because of secret diplomacy or being a multi.

Fixed your links.

Since this is the only game these two players have played together I doubt this is a case of multiple accounts. Seems fomandy just isn't very good.

by **Narkasurthedemon** on Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:52 pm

Really can not believe this report. Is there any sanctions to stop players making spurious reports? In this game I was attacked suspiciously by Tiger and raised it in chat. Formandy also was suspicious of Tiger and Bandit, we both reduced borders to concentrate on the two players whom we suspected of wrongdoing.
I did not have enough evidence to make a report so dealing with it in game. No multi, no secret diplomacy. Was interested to find out Bandit has previously been suspected of being a multi though and as Bandit tried to bust my bonus and failed and with no chat Tiger did the job for him when in my opinion it gained him nothing it does make me wonder.
Happy for anyone to look at this game or any other I have played. But would respectfully request them to look at the whole game and all the players.

by **Narkasurthedemon** on Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:58 pm

Oh yes, forgot to mention that Tiger and Bandit play a lot of two player games together. Not a crime I know but clearly have some connection.

by **bandit1986** on Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:59 pm

I would like to withdraw this report. I guess Fomandy just has no idea what he's doing. In Tiger's defence, I would have done exactly as he did. Narkasur was out a huge lead and left a big bonus undefended on a border with Tiger. The suspicious behaviour is not why Tiger and I would attack the obvious leader in the game, it is why the other players in the game have not when they easily could have. Will just accept that the game now belongs to Narkasur and move on.

by **Narkasurthedemon** on Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:34 pm

Bandit, thank you, still do not get Tigers move but as he has not made a comment cannot condemn you for it. Perhaps as you play a lot together and he was not in a winning position he thought he would do you a favour.
Hope we can both put this behind us and move on.