Moderator: Community Team
jonty125 wrote:Self-preservation (not sure if I'm in time or not so I'm not going to risk a long post vote Storr
jonty125 wrote:Self-preservation (not sure if I'm in time or not so I'm not going to risk a long post vote Storr
StorrZerg wrote:mets whats your thought on jonty last post? (anyone else can give their thought too)jonty125 wrote:Self-preservation (not sure if I'm in time or not so I'm not going to risk a long post vote Storr
(the self preservation thing is fine imo)
But what about the not "risking" a long post?
Streaker wrote:So James, all we need to give you is a 'clean' night, in a game where EVERYONE has a power? And mafia has to cooperate as well?
I hate changing my votes around like this, but I always said I was more interested in lynching jonty for reasons stated. I also believe we get more information from lynching him, especially about DJ.
I'd also like to add that any discussion about balancing power roles (i read something Storr said about town not having any investigative roles is unlikely) is moot, in a game called 'balance not included'.
Unvote, vote jonty
The more accurate word is deflection.
The james read on jonty.
Forced, not really. I wanted him to convince me to not vote him and vote jonty. He only has 2 options today. He could have just pushed me instead.
As for Speirs, yes I'm informing him of his options. Not opinions.
As well as his no lynch thing about me was not as black and white.
No idea what your NL comments are about.
Nah. Strongly disagree that directing actions are scummy. If I'm lynched my opinion on actions become super valid. Also mets gave a suggestion to james on what to do, why didn't you fault him?
I would hope you care that people make a smart choice about their actions. You have to admit if james checked streaker if i was lynched would be very laughable.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Yes, we can all agree that it is better if James (or whoever) posts more. The disagree there is that you claimed that his post level provided you with some sort of information that made you think his alignment was scum. Others (like pancakemix and I) felt that his activity was independent of his alignment in this case.StorrZerg wrote:But at the end, getting james to talk was productive.
Most likely he was referring that either the deadline hitting or him reaching the vote threshold before he finish typing out a long post.StorrZerg wrote:But what about the not "risking" a long post?
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.
JamesKer1 wrote:Vote Jonty for being scum?
Just kidding... Nice to have you back. Looks like a crazy night.
Luckily, I investigated someone who didn't die, and I should get those results back soon as proof of my role.
Iron Butterfly wrote:JamesKer1 wrote:Vote Jonty for being scum?
Just kidding... Nice to have you back. Looks like a crazy night.
Luckily, I investigated someone who didn't die, and I should get those results back soon as proof of my role.
Why the hell would you receive your investigation results today instead of during the night? Please explain how you KNOW you were bus driven?
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users