Moderator: Community Team
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Does the knowledge that it with Jak at least there wasn't a strong correlation between when it happened and his alignment give you reason to reconsider what you are doing here?pancakemix wrote:They've given reasons. I at least understand their logic so I can't fault them for being reasoned. Granted I don't usually go off like this on D1, but I do do it (mostly with jak).
Calling an argument/discussion stupid and refusing to engage with it seems like a way to stifle said discussion.Metsfanmax wrote:I merely was voicing my opinion that it was stupid and I would not participate in it without a good reason. I did not attempt to actively stifle any discussion. No lynching threats were made, etc. I just said an argument was bad.pancakemix wrote:That's the first point: trying to stifle an argument by invoking the holy acronym without cause.
You can't exclude yourself from that math when you aren't the one shooting. Virus doesn't know if you are scum or not.mtamburini wrote:When I asked him to bring up the math he got and after he explained it it surprises me he included himself in the 3/11 and not make it 3/10 removing himself from the equation. If you include a lynch today and we hit town instead of mafia it becomes 3/9. Still losing odds but better then 3/11. I always exclude myself out of odds and probabilities when Im town.
StorrZerg wrote:Everyone needs to hop on dj wagon now.
no one has counter claimed being a vig, likely that Virus is real. We only have roughly 6 hours.
StorrZerg wrote:disagree, i doubt roles are the same.
(unless its something role specific together)
(shit guys i just confirmed im not a vig o lord)
Metsfanmax wrote:StorrZerg wrote:disagree, i doubt roles are the same.
(unless its something role specific together)
(shit guys i just confirmed im not a vig o lord)
I'm not saying there's multiple vigilantes here. I'm saying that, for example, town could have both a one-shot vig and a JOAT, and the JOAT would have no reason to counterclaim the vigilante since they're completely different roles.
StorrZerg wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:StorrZerg wrote:disagree, i doubt roles are the same.
(unless its something role specific together)
(shit guys i just confirmed im not a vig o lord)
I'm not saying there's multiple vigilantes here. I'm saying that, for example, town could have both a one-shot vig and a JOAT, and the JOAT would have no reason to counterclaim the vigilante since they're completely different roles.
yeah i fail to see the reason you posted this. I don't think it changes my point.
StorrZerg wrote:kk fyi. mafia have fake claims in this game. This shouldn't be a surprise based on what we have. You know to help prevent a mass claim from working.
SO i'm REALLY questioning people who are "saying the claim is weak" or w/e cause or saying "well i expected batman to be different " blah. (correct me if im wrong, but i think dj was pushing that)
HotShot53 wrote:StorrZerg wrote:kk fyi. mafia have fake claims in this game. This shouldn't be a surprise based on what we have. You know to help prevent a mass claim from working.
SO i'm REALLY questioning people who are "saying the claim is weak" or w/e cause or saying "well i expected batman to be different " blah. (correct me if im wrong, but i think dj was pushing that)
How did you find this out? If this is true, then if virus is making a fake claim he won't be counterclaimed because he already knows no-one else has this role. Which would mean either he is a 1-shot vig, or there is no similar vig in the game. Either one I could see happening, since this is balance-not-included mafia after all. His lack of posting even though he is on the chopping block doesn't look good for him either. Worst-case scenario, we lynch a 1-shot vig who was going to take a potshot tonight anyway. Best case, we lynch a scum. Either way, we get more info than a no-lynch. So I will leave my vote where it is for now.
FP by Storr... I was typing lol, taking a 2 min break while at work that I really shouldn't be, but figured I should get my comment out before day's end
virus90 wrote:@metsfanmax, i am just a 1-shot vig, maybe there is a 1-shot vig, but for the same reasoning i think if i would have claimed 1-shot vig, there could have been 2, and although i think its not likely, there might be 2 vigi's aswell. as you say, its not balanced, why would it be impossbile to have 2 roles of the same/. similar tpye.
spiesr wrote:Pancakemix, about this post, what motive are you assuming a scum Mets would have in doing the thing in Point 1 without creating a situation where he was right about the thing in Point 2?
Does the knowledge that it with Jak at least there wasn't a strong correlation between when it happened and his alignment give you reason to reconsider what you are doing here?
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users