Monthly Foe Reboot

[CargoAirships]

Once a month your foe cache should go back to zero.

I think once a month everyones foe list should be zeroed out. Sometimes I do have foes, usually people I suspect of cheating, but then again sometimes the cheaters foe me just because I call them out on it.

Concise description: 1 time every 30 days all foe list should be zeroed.


Specifics/Details: Think I covered that.

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments: I think this would allow for more games to happen as I seem to have a lot of foes already....

People will still be able to have foes, or maybe just have a limit of five foes at a time, so you have to choose which are the best player to keep on your list.

[Shannon Apple]

There are 1 or 2 people that I don't want to play with, or have to read their forum posts. period. My foe list of 2 does not affect anyone else. There are 100s of people who may have added one or two jackasses to their foe list, they need to stay there.

Sure, there is sometimes an issue where some medal hunting idiot foes everyone who plays a certain type of game when he beats them, then goes on to join every active game of that type. That's mega frustrating and i'd be in support of a 50 cap on the foe list, but resetting it? Hell no.

[BigBallinStalin]

What's your record for detecting actual cheaters?

[agentcom]

So, I would have to keep and update a separate list of my foes and re-foe every month? No thanks.

[blakebowling]

Automatically emptying foe lists after a certain interval? Almost certainly not going to happen.

A limit on the number of foes you can have? Possible, but it would need a bit of reasoning behind it.

[IcePack]

Automatically emptying foe lists after a certain interval? Almost certainly not going to happen.

A limit on the number of foes you can have? Possible, but it would need a bit of reasoning behind it.

Please no...if the site ever grew to much larger proportions you'd need a larger list then what you have for 12k players. Foe list is really a player only defense from keeping certain players out of their games (or medal hunting) .

[betiko]

There are so many players that are not worth playing ever again; they should remain foed.
A few forum posters too.
If we cleared the foed list every month as you suggest, why not directly ask to remove the foe system?

[Serbia]

I don't think I've ever used the foe feature for game play; for me, it's always been about avoiding people in the forums. I don't want to have to re-foe certain people once a month. Bad idea.

Bollocks.

[spiesr]

REJECTED: Since an admin stated this isn't going to happen.

[owenshooter]

REJECTED: Since an admin stated this isn't going to happen.

how about being responsible for your own foe list and making better decisions about who goes on it... i personally don't foe anyone, i think it is immature... i understand the reasons, but the few people i don't want to play with, they already know it...-eJn

[gcwca_4_life]

This...
This is a concept for the strong.

Why was it shot down?
CC is full of weaklings with no spines. This should have been so.
You are all too weak for the upcoming zombie apocalypse.

[gcwca_4_life]

REJECTED: Since an admin stated this isn't going to happen.

I almost forgot Blake was an admin for some time.
Dang. I've missed sooo much on CC.