Closed Man from Modesto (Throwing Game) [BG]

[jak111]

Accused:

Man from Modesto



The accused are suspected of:

Other: Throwing the game.



Game number(s):

Game 14201100


Comments:

He even admitted to it.

2014-07-11 08:32:05 - Man from Modesto: haha... I tricked you. Now yellow is going to bust you up and take the lead. I want yellow to win cuz I'll lose fewer points. ~ He says is here first.
2014-07-11 08:32:11 - Man from Modesto: hahahahahaha.
2014-07-11 08:48:26 - Man from Modesto: See, I'm not the big boy on the block now.
2014-07-11 14:18:36 - jak111: Did you seriously just say you are throwing the game to yellow to "lose less points"? REALLY? ~ I question him to see if it was a slip of tongue.
2014-07-11 14:34:22 - Man from Modesto: no shame in that. ~ He confirms that's what he means.

Basically right now I'm in a game that is not being played to win anymore but to "lose less points". That is complete BS. He is saying if I were higher ranked he'd be throwing the game in my favour to "lose less points". Either way, that's wrong. The site really needs to start equalizing points gained and loss so it's not enough for people to throw games in one or another's favour for them.

[jak111]

It's slowly starting to turn back around again. Funny how that works once you point someone out for doing something wrong.

[BGtheBrain]

cleared for game throwing

[Man from Modesto]

Ah. I did not know I was officially accused. Anyhow, At that point in the game I needed jak to concentrate more on yellow, not one me. I needed to build up.

First, I let him know i had just been manipulating him... then, I manipulated him again. The funniest part is, he did this.

When he posted in the chat and said "defend yourself," I replied, "later." Why would I reveal an effective strategy of controlling his plays via chat?

The game balanced out later, as jak said, because jak attacked yellow. hahahahaha... not because I did anything different in my strategy.

Honestly, orange had begun using the chat very effectively. I had to respond in kind. Not my favorite strategy at all.

I just wanted to wait until after the game ended and respond to my accuser. Now, let's review what was actually said:

haha... I tricked you. Now yellow is going to bust you up and take the lead. I want yellow to win cuz I'll lose fewer points.

I did not say I would throw the game. I only meant that, if one or the other of the remaining 2 opponents were to win, it would be better for me if it were the higher ranking. I did word it carefully to dupe orange. It worked.

2014-07-11 04:32:11 - Man from Modesto: hahahahahaha.
2014-07-11 04:48:26 - Man from Modesto: See, I'm not the big boy on the block now.
2014-07-11 10:18:36 - jak111: Did you seriously just say you are throwing the game to yellow to "lose less points"? REALLY?

Orange took the bait.

2014-07-11 10:34:22 - Man from Modesto: no shame in that.

I can neither confirm nor deny... haha! I am glad that whoever reviewed this one got it. Peace.

To jak: Overall, the game was good and fun. However, I will foe you now. I really don't like the heavy-on-chat games. Peace.

[Man from Modesto]

btw... I did not confirm I was throwing the game. This is proven in the fact I eventually won. The balancing out of the game had nothing to do with this accusation. In fact, I did not even come here until game end.

"No shame in that" was meant to keep you thinking that is what I would do.... so you would fear and attack yellow. And, you did.