And you were the one was being an idiot.Asymmetry wrote:Hey, Scotty was the one claiming Paul's support came from both ends of the spectrum...Sillypig wrote:What a stupid comment. Communists are not in the least interested in Libertarian policies and facists are pro an aggressive military. The two groups you mentioned are among the groups least likely to support his policies. You're as stupid and misinformed as the people calling Obama a communist, shame on you.Asymmetry wrote:Fascists and Communists? I'm not sure that's a strong base, but perhaps I'm wrong.Phatscotty wrote:That's what I mean...Rand Paul get support from both end of the spectrum.
GOP Presidential Nominees
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?Gillipig wrote:And you were the one was being an idiot.Asymmetry wrote:Hey, Scotty was the one claiming Paul's support came from both ends of the spectrum...Sillypig wrote:What a stupid comment. Communists are not in the least interested in Libertarian policies and facists are pro an aggressive military. The two groups you mentioned are among the groups least likely to support his policies. You're as stupid and misinformed as the people calling Obama a communist, shame on you.Asymmetry wrote:Fascists and Communists? I'm not sure that's a strong base, but perhaps I'm wrong.Phatscotty wrote:That's what I mean...Rand Paul get support from both end of the spectrum.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.Symmetry wrote:Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?Gillipig wrote:And you were the one was being an idiot.Asymmetry wrote:Hey, Scotty was the one claiming Paul's support came from both ends of the spectrum...Sillypig wrote:What a stupid comment. Communists are not in the least interested in Libertarian policies and facists are pro an aggressive military. The two groups you mentioned are among the groups least likely to support his policies. You're as stupid and misinformed as the people calling Obama a communist, shame on you.Asymmetry wrote:Fascists and Communists? I'm not sure that's a strong base, but perhaps I'm wrong.Phatscotty wrote:That's what I mean...Rand Paul get support from both end of the spectrum.
Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
So the spectrum encompasses communists and fascists. But only in Sweden. Ok, I disagree.Gillipig wrote:In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.Symmetry wrote:
Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?
Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.
Edit: I don't really need to type this, as I have the last post, but hey, apparently you can put the bulk of your irrelevant argument here. This is fun.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.Symmetry wrote:So the spectrum encompasses communists and fascists. But only in Sweden. Ok, I disagree.Gillipig wrote:In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.Symmetry wrote:
Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?
Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.
Edit: I don't really need to type this, as I have the last post, but hey, apparently you can put the bulk of your irrelevant argument here. This is fun.
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.Sillypig wrote:You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.Symmetry wrote:So the spectrum encompasses communists and fascists. But only in Sweden. Ok, I disagree.Sillypig wrote:In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.Symmetry wrote:
Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?
Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.
Edit: I don't really need to type this, as I have the last post, but hey, apparently you can put the bulk of your irrelevant argument here. This is fun.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
American or British I can't tell the difference, you write in the same manner and seem to have similar values, your culture is virtually identical and the only way to tell you apart is through your accents. You'd like to think there's so much difference but to an outsider there really isn't.Americantry wrote:Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.Sillypig wrote:You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.Symmetry wrote:So the spectrum encompasses communists and fascists. But only in Sweden. Ok, I disagree.Sillypig wrote:In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.Symmetry wrote:
Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?
Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.
Edit: I don't really need to type this, as I have the last post, but hey, apparently you can put the bulk of your irrelevant argument here. This is fun.
Having said that, we were speaking about american politics weren't we? I'm pretty sure PS wasn't talking about British politics when he talked about Rand Paul's appeal in the political spectrum.
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
I think the issue of American vs British English is mostly with u,Gillipig wrote:American or British I can't tell the difference, you write in the same manner and seem to have similar values, your culture is virtually identical and the only way to tell you apart is through your accents. You'd like to think there's so much difference but to an outsider there really isn't.Americantry wrote:Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.Sillypig wrote:You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.Symmetry wrote:So the spectrum encompasses communists and fascists. But only in Sweden. Ok, I disagree.Sillypig wrote:In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.Symmetry wrote:
Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?
Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.
Edit: I don't really need to type this, as I have the last post, but hey, apparently you can put the bulk of your irrelevant argument here. This is fun.
Having said that, we were speaking about american politics weren't we? I'm pretty sure PS wasn't talking about British politics when he talked about Rand Paul's appeal in the political spectrum.
I thought I was commenting on the spectrum of politics.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
Well you were wrong on both accounts.Wrongetry wrote:I think the issue of American vs British English is mostly with u,Gillipig wrote:American or British I can't tell the difference, you write in the same manner and seem to have similar values, your culture is virtually identical and the only way to tell you apart is through your accents. You'd like to think there's so much difference but to an outsider there really isn't.Americantry wrote:Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.Sillypig wrote: You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.
Having said that, we were speaking about american politics weren't we? I'm pretty sure PS wasn't talking about British politics when he talked about Rand Paul's appeal in the political spectrum.
I thought I was commenting on the spectrum of politics.
Your cultures are eerily similar and you weren't commenting on the spectrum of politics in general, you were commenting on the spectrums of american politics.
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
Was I? Thank you for pointing that out to me. I hadn't realised that I was being so eerie. Thanks for telling me that although I was commenting on the spectrum of political thought, that I actually wasn't.Gillipig wrote:Well you were wrong on both accounts.Wrongetry wrote:I think the issue of American vs British English is mostly with u,Gillipig wrote:American or British I can't tell the difference, you write in the same manner and seem to have similar values, your culture is virtually identical and the only way to tell you apart is through your accents. You'd like to think there's so much difference but to an outsider there really isn't.Americantry wrote:Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.Sillypig wrote: You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.
Having said that, we were speaking about american politics weren't we? I'm pretty sure PS wasn't talking about British politics when he talked about Rand Paul's appeal in the political spectrum.
I thought I was commenting on the spectrum of politics.
Your cultures are eerily similar and you weren't commenting on the spectrum of politics in general, you were commenting on the spectrums of american politics.
It was a shock to me.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
- Phatscotty
- Posts: 3693
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
IndeedSymmetry wrote:....perhaps I'm wrong.Phatscotty wrote:That's what I mean...Rand Paul get support from both Republicans and Democrats, right and left.
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
Of all the posters, I would have thought you'd outright deny me. Thanks for saying that I am perhaps right.Phatscotty wrote:IndeedSymmetry wrote:....perhaps I'm wrong.Phatscotty wrote:That's what I mean...Rand Paul get support from both Republicans and Democrats, right and left.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
- Nola_Lifer
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:46 pm
- Location: 雪山
- Contact:
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
Once again, all political parties can see, you show yourself as the biggest ass clown on CC. Congrats!Symmetry wrote:Of all the posters, I would have thought you'd outright deny me. Thanks for saying that I am perhaps right.Phatscotty wrote:IndeedSymmetry wrote:....perhaps I'm wrong.Phatscotty wrote:That's what I mean...Rand Paul get support from both Republicans and Democrats, right and left.
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
You don't fool me mister, I don't think you are capable of learning anything at this point, your mind has already been set.Symmetry wrote:Was I? Thank you for pointing that out to me. I hadn't realised that I was being so eerie. Thanks for telling me that although I was commenting on the spectrum of political thought, that I actually wasn't.Gillipig wrote:Well you were wrong on both accounts.Wrongetry wrote:I think the issue of American vs British English is mostly with u,Gillipig wrote:American or British I can't tell the difference, you write in the same manner and seem to have similar values, your culture is virtually identical and the only way to tell you apart is through your accents. You'd like to think there's so much difference but to an outsider there really isn't.Americantry wrote:Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.Sillypig wrote: You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.
Having said that, we were speaking about american politics weren't we? I'm pretty sure PS wasn't talking about British politics when he talked about Rand Paul's appeal in the political spectrum.
I thought I was commenting on the spectrum of politics.
Your cultures are eerily similar and you weren't commenting on the spectrum of politics in general, you were commenting on the spectrums of american politics.
It was a shock to me.
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
I've learned that fascism and communism can't exist in the US. Thanks Gilli!Gillipig wrote:You don't fool me mister, I don't think you are capable of learning anything at this point, your mind has already been set.Symmetry wrote:
Was I? Thank you for pointing that out to me. I hadn't realised that I was being so eerie. Thanks for telling me that although I was commenting on the spectrum of political thought, that I actually wasn't.
It was a shock to me.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
- BigBallinStalin
- Posts: 5071
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
- Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
- Contact:
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
Fascism and Communism are the two poles of the simple left v right political spectrum.
SYM WINS!!!
SYM WINS!!!
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
Only if we're talking about Sweden though, apparently.BigBallinStalin wrote:Fascism and Communism are the two poles of the simple left v right political spectrum.
SYM WINS!!!
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
- BigBallinStalin
- Posts: 5071
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
- Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
- Contact:
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
Of course! Communists and fascists do not exist in the United States nor Canada.Symmetry wrote:Only if we're talking about Sweden though, apparently.BigBallinStalin wrote:Fascism and Communism are the two poles of the simple left v right political spectrum.
SYM WINS!!!
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
Or the UK! Gilli says we're the same politically.BigBallinStalin wrote:Of course! Communists and fascists do not exist in the United States nor Canada.Symmetry wrote:Only if we're talking about Sweden though, apparently.BigBallinStalin wrote:Fascism and Communism are the two poles of the simple left v right political spectrum.
SYM WINS!!!
Oh, Sillypig...
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
BigBallinStalin wrote:Fascism and Communism are the two poles of the simple left v right political spectrum.
SYM WINS!!!
I DON'T AGREE!!!
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
- Nola_Lifer
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:46 pm
- Location: 雪山
- Contact:
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
Gillipig admit it he won. He trolled another thread and completely derailed it. CLAIM HIM AS WINNER!Gillipig wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Fascism and Communism are the two poles of the simple left v right political spectrum.
SYM WINS!!!
I DON'T AGREE!!!
- BigBallinStalin
- Posts: 5071
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
- Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
- Contact:
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
I gave both of you the Sore Losers prize along with a 3/5 for attitude. 5/5 for fair play though. Still not sure about gameplay, so I left it blank.Nola_Lifer wrote:Gillipig admit it he won. He trolled another thread and completely derailed it. CLAIM HIM AS WINNER!Gillipig wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Fascism and Communism are the two poles of the simple left v right political spectrum.
SYM WINS!!!
I DON'T AGREE!!!
- Phatscotty
- Posts: 3693
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: GOP Presidential Nominees
Well I voted for Perry because surely it's impossible to lose against a man who has ordered Texas prisons not to follow rape prevention laws,and who presided over the execution in Aug 2012 of an imbecile with an IQ of 61.Of course he wont win the nomination,that would be political suicide..

