MeDeFe wrote:Nope, more = better chances for the attacker.
I think the chance of winning a 1000 vs. 1000 is slightly better than winning a 100 vs. 100, just to name an example. The attacker has a slightly better chance of winning a "standard" throw with 3 vs. 2 dices, so the more throws the closer the real result should be to the expected result, which is that the attacker wins.
Hmm... yes, sort of. The way statistics works is that each throw must be seen individually. But, the more individual throws you have, the entire amount of throws tend to close in on the statistical values. But that is merely due to the way percentage works. With 1 throw, that throw amounts to 100%. With ten throws, each throw only amounts to 10% of the total, while 1000 throws gives each throw the weight of 0.1% of the total.
But, you may very well loose 1000 straight throws. The likelyhood to win a throw doesn't increase just because you throw the dice again and again. For each throw (3v.2), you have a 20-something % chance to loose both your attacking armies. Conceptually, it is annoying.