The Championships - Triples [Complete]

[Rodion]

Frog is freemium at the moment.
I also qualify with loes and thebest712, but the latter is retired.

[josko.ri]

I suggest to change the 15 games rule from this:

1) Players A,B,C need to have 15 or more wins together

into this:

1) Players A,B,C need to have 15 or more triples wins together

OR

2) If players A,B,C have n triples wins together (n<15), they can still qualify if:

Players A,B have (15-n) or more triples wins together
&
Players A,C have (15-n) or more triples wins together
&
Players B,C have (15-n) or more triples wins together

If all 3 players have 15+ wins in triples game among themselves, but just do not have it achieved playing as one team but rather playing as 2 of them together and a third player, that is the same value like if they played it together.

Notice, if a triples team has never played together, that means they can still qualify with rule (2) but it means the other 45 games (15 games in combination of every player) need to be achieved.

[TX AG 90]

In please

With hutchkov and geko

Thanks,

TX AG 90

[lordlau1]

In please....lordlau1, rjhankey, and leverpuller

we have 22 wins together.

thanks.

[ooge]

ooge,cjtails and slaylark plz.

[sdh]

sdh, hmsps, sekretar will play please

[Armandolas]

I suggest to change the 15 games rule from this:

1) Players A,B,C need to have 15 or more wins together

into this:

1) Players A,B,C need to have 15 or more triples wins together

OR

2) If players A,B,C have n triples wins together (n<15), they can still qualify if:

Players A,B have (15-n) or more triples wins together
&
Players A,C have (15-n) or more triples wins together
&
Players B,C have (15-n) or more triples wins together

If all 3 players have 15+ wins in triples game among themselves, but just do not have it achieved playing as one team but rather playing as 2 of them together and a third player, that is the same value like if they played it together.

Notice, if a triples team has never played together, that means they can still qualify with rule (2) but it means the other 45 games (15 games in combination of every player) need to be achieved.

I have to agree with something like this, even though i think i would not qualify either.


I just dont get it, why are no sattelites for this tournament.?
If you want i can organize it with no troubles. But please, at least give the chance to some good teams try their luck

[Foxglove]

I suggest to change the 15 games rule from this:

1) Players A,B,C need to have 15 or more wins together

into this:

1) Players A,B,C need to have 15 or more triples wins together

OR

2) If players A,B,C have n triples wins together (n<15), they can still qualify if:

Players A,B have (15-n) or more triples wins together
&
Players A,C have (15-n) or more triples wins together
&
Players B,C have (15-n) or more triples wins together

If all 3 players have 15+ wins in triples game among themselves, but just do not have it achieved playing as one team but rather playing as 2 of them together and a third player, that is the same value like if they played it together.

Notice, if a triples team has never played together, that means they can still qualify with rule (2) but it means the other 45 games (15 games in combination of every player) need to be achieved.

Yes! I like this system. Please consider it, organizers - because this problem will only be worse for the quads tournament. I think the 15 wins criteria as it stands now prohibits the entry of a lot of fantastic triples team players. I did some research into my own stats, and I'm not even eligible to play with the vast majority of my clan or regular team mates. I qualified with exactly 2 people, and luckily they wanted to play with me. But I do think the current requirements are overly restrictive, and I'm sure there are tons of skilled team players who want to enter but can't.

[dakky21]

Yes! I like this system. Please consider it, organizers - because this problem will only be worse for the quads tournament. I think the 15 wins criteria as it stands now prohibits the entry of a lot of fantastic triples team players. I did some research into my own stats, and I'm not even eligible to play with the vast majority of my clan or regular team mates. I qualified with exactly 2 people, and luckily they wanted to play with me. But I do think the current requirements are overly restrictive, and I'm sure there are tons of skilled team players who want to enter but can't.

Well I don't get it what you two are trying to say?

The rule states:

You and your team must have won 15 triples games together.

So if you're a team, you'd probably already have 15 wins together? If you want to team up now, you're not a team. You're more of a squad.

If you want to get into Quads tourney, team up now and win 15 quads, so you can join the Quads tourney. Simple as that.

[dakky21]

BTW, in please: dakky21, benga, Hannibal 19 .. we have 15 wins together...

Thank you for organizing this

[umbrellaman]

umbrellaman in with evildoer and generalahole

[macbone]

Ah, too bad. The sitter rule disqualifies my team. One of us is only allowed to have fellow clanmates sit for him, and I can only have Team CC people sit for me. We need that sitter function ASAP!

[Foxglove]

Ah, too bad. The sitter rule disqualifies my team. One of us is only allowed to have fellow clanmates sit for him, and I can only have Team CC people sit for me. We need that sitter function ASAP!

Oh. This is a problem for me too. I need to figure it out, somehow.

I would imagine this rule disqualifies the majority of Team CC players who want to participate.

[sccoxx]

sccoxx, ltndvm, and JJ41375 please

[JJ41375]

Ah, too bad. The sitter rule disqualifies my team. One of us is only allowed to have fellow clanmates sit for him, and I can only have Team CC people sit for me. We need that sitter function ASAP!

Oh. This is a problem for me too. I need to figure it out, somehow.

I would imagine this rule disqualifies the majority of Team CC players who want to participate.

I didn't even think of this because I usually don't need my sitters to grab my turns...I wonder if this rule can be adjusted in any way...especially if the sitter is not in the tournament. Or can games be delayed if somebody is going on vacation. Just a couple thoughts as it seems like this is an issue for people in a clan who want to play with members outside their clan. I also do not have enough triple game wins with any 2 of my clan members.

Anyway, I am willing to take the chance that I do not need a sitter for any of my games in the tournament.

Thanks for running.

JJ

In this tournament with: sccoxx, ltndvm, and JJ41375

[Bobby4254]

Another question. I play with 2 others regularly. We play triples and quads together. As a triples team we have nine wins. We have seven more wins where all three of us are on a quads team. Would this count, or is it strictly triples wins?

If so we are interested:
Bobby4254, DetroitSteel, eric111213

[Leehar]

I have Triples Gold, yet no one who I've won more than 15 trips games with

[PROFITS]

PROFITS, BRADDY, TheProwler in please

[ckyrias]

in pls with dana1971 and epitaph1. 15+ wins achieved

[angola]

Will all 12 first round games start at once? That is a bit much for triples games.

[DoomYoshi]

I count 25 signups so far (including some who don't quite qualify). You may need to leave this open a bit longer.

[Dukasaur]

I suggest to change the 15 games rule from this:

1) Players A,B,C need to have 15 or more wins together

into this:

1) Players A,B,C need to have 15 or more triples wins together

OR

2) If players A,B,C have n triples wins together (n<15), they can still qualify if:

Players A,B have (15-n) or more triples wins together
&
Players A,C have (15-n) or more triples wins together
&
Players B,C have (15-n) or more triples wins together

If all 3 players have 15+ wins in triples game among themselves, but just do not have it achieved playing as one team but rather playing as 2 of them together and a third player, that is the same value like if they played it together.

Notice, if a triples team has never played together, that means they can still qualify with rule (2) but it means the other 45 games (15 games in combination of every player) need to be achieved.

We are accepting this proposed amendment.

[Gilligan]

So let me understand that properly -

Gilligan, SuperWang, Peter Gibbons - 12 wins together.

Gilligan and Peter Gibbons have won 8 triples games without SuperWang.
Gilligan and SuperWang have won 15 triples games without Peter Gibbons.
SuperWang and Peter Gibbons have won 5 games without Gilligan.

Does this mean that we qualify? The way I see it, part in 2) means we only need 2 wins without the other player apiece.

[josko.ri]

Thanks to Dukasaur or accepting the proposal

So let me understand that properly -

Gilligan, SuperWang, Peter Gibbons - 12 wins together.

Gilligan and Peter Gibbons have won 8 triples games without SuperWang.
Gilligan and SuperWang have won 15 triples games without Peter Gibbons.
SuperWang and Peter Gibbons have won 5 games without Gilligan.

Does this mean that we qualify? The way I see it, part in 2) means we only need 2 wins without the other player apiece.

As i worded it i will explain:

You have 12 wins together so n=12. That means you need only 3 wins (15-n) in combination of eqch of 3 players together, and your numbers are 8/15/5 so you qualify.

You would not qualify if your numbers are for example 8/15/2 because in that case SuperWang and Petter Gibbons are not eligible because they would have 14 triples wins together (12 with Gilligan and 2 with other teammate).