Conquer Club

The Championships - 1v1 - [t4mcr53s2]

For finished TPA, Championship and other great tournaments of the past

Moderator: Tournament Directors

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby Gamefreakguy on Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:22 pm

In! Excited about this :D
"Never let your fear decide your fate."
"He who controls others may be powerful but he who has mastered himself is mightier still." Lao Tzu
User avatar
Major Gamefreakguy
 
Posts: 419
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 5:11 pm

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby JOHNNYROCKET24 on Wed Dec 04, 2013 9:11 pm

im in
JR's Game Profile

show
Highest Score- 3969
Highest Place- 1st
Highest Rank- Conqueror
Total Medals Won- 157
6 time Wac-a-Mod Champion
June 2014 Monthly Challenge Winner
August 2020 Monthly Challenge Winner
User avatar
Captain JOHNNYROCKET24
 
Posts: 5514
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:11 am
Location: among the leets
52

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby xman5151 on Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:43 pm

In please
User avatar
Private xman5151
 
Posts: 697
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 1:57 pm
Location: Michigan, USA

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby rayofsun on Thu Dec 05, 2013 12:30 am

in pls
User avatar
Sergeant rayofsun
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:53 pm
Location: Mind-full-ness

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby Kingm on Thu Dec 05, 2013 12:59 am

In please
Highscore : 4349 Date : 17.6.12
Rank : 6 Date : 13.6.12

Highscore after comeback : 3619 Date : 07.11.23
Rank : 23 Date : 07.11.23

Image
User avatar
Brigadier Kingm
 
Posts: 694
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Norway

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby gochisox2004 on Thu Dec 05, 2013 2:27 am

in please. do we get a confirmation that we're in?
Sergeant gochisox2004
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:15 am

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby Yatti on Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:47 am

I'm in as long as I've got enough qualifying wins
Captain Yatti
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 1:03 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby phantomzero on Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:51 am

chapcrap wrote:
Jippd wrote:
alaskanassassin wrote:I'd like to play. Though my score isn't so hot, at least I have till the 30th. So there is no consideration given to peoples 1 v 1 scores or win ratio? Because if this is to find the best 1 v 1 champ shouldn't that be taken into account. Someone may have 3200 and a much higher score than me and they get all that from speed games or winning 8 player games, but that has nothing to do with 1 v 1. Just a question?


This is a good point. You could easily map rank players on the 30th to figure out their 1 v 1 win ratio.

Well, it's just a tiebreaker. The problem with ratio is they could be lying as well. What if they play a bunch of games against bad players? What if I map rank and it includes bot games as well, which can definitely increase the winning precentage pretty easily?

Essentially, I am open to all tiebreakers and if something is more fair than something else, I don't necessarily have a problem using something different than points, but I'm not really sure that we have anything more fair than simply overall points.

#Jippd #alaskanassassin


This is my issue as well. From the number of people who have signed up I won't be grtting in to this based on rank and didn't hear about this tourny until the qualifiers were full. It is disappointing for someone who has won and organized many 1-1 tournaments to not be able to play. Not sure of any other methods for entry
just wish I could play.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class phantomzero
 
Posts: 827
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 7:13 pm
Location: 2742 high score 122710

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby iAmCaffeine on Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:11 am

In please.
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby Erland on Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:27 am

In, please
Image
User avatar
Captain Erland
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:40 am
Location: Springfield, VA

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby ltiyank on Thu Dec 05, 2013 10:06 am

In please
Major ltiyank
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:57 am

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby chapcrap on Thu Dec 05, 2013 10:08 am

gochisox2004 wrote:in please. do we get a confirmation that we're in?

Yes. I'll let everyone know.
phantomzero wrote:
chapcrap wrote:
Jippd wrote:
alaskanassassin wrote:I'd like to play. Though my score isn't so hot, at least I have till the 30th. So there is no consideration given to peoples 1 v 1 scores or win ratio? Because if this is to find the best 1 v 1 champ shouldn't that be taken into account. Someone may have 3200 and a much higher score than me and they get all that from speed games or winning 8 player games, but that has nothing to do with 1 v 1. Just a question?


This is a good point. You could easily map rank players on the 30th to figure out their 1 v 1 win ratio.

Well, it's just a tiebreaker. The problem with ratio is they could be lying as well. What if they play a bunch of games against bad players? What if I map rank and it includes bot games as well, which can definitely increase the winning precentage pretty easily?

Essentially, I am open to all tiebreakers and if something is more fair than something else, I don't necessarily have a problem using something different than points, but I'm not really sure that we have anything more fair than simply overall points.

#Jippd #alaskanassassin


This is my issue as well. From the number of people who have signed up I won't be grtting in to this based on rank and didn't hear about this tourny until the qualifiers were full. It is disappointing for someone who has won and organized many 1-1 tournaments to not be able to play. Not sure of any other methods for entry
just wish I could play.

I don't think organizing (you've organized zero 1v1 tournaments) should have anything to do it at all. Maybe winning (you've won two 1v1 tournaments) could. I'm not sure that you'd qualify under a criteria that we'd set for tournament wins though. I'll think about that and talk with bigWham.

#phantomzero #gochisox2004
Lieutenant chapcrap
 
Posts: 9686
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Location: Kansas City

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby shoop76 on Thu Dec 05, 2013 10:36 am

I agree that with the way the system is set up many top 1 v 1 players may not qualify. Players that play mainly 1 v 1 tourneys in general have a lot lower score than they are capable of. Just finished playing a low ranked player in a best of 9 series, I won 7 and lost 2 yet was destroyed on points (58 for each loss and 6 points gained for each win). Just last week I was over 3000. Not sure where my score will be on the 30th but generally am between 2000 and 2500. I have 71 1 v1 tourney wins. Don't know if this will be enough to gain entry. Yet many players never play 1 v 1 tournaments and are rated 3000 or higher. These players will gain automatic entry and a high initial seed.

If this was an official championship shouldn't everyone have access to it. I know there are qualifiers available but they were just thrown at us last minute.

EDIT: How about to enter this tourney you must have won at least 1v1 tourney.
User avatar
Colonel shoop76
Tournament Commissioner
Tournament Commissioner
 
Posts: 5513
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:44 am
710764

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby georgizhukov on Thu Dec 05, 2013 11:01 am

IN please
Colonel georgizhukov
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:08 pm
Location: Charleston SC
2

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby SasquatchCaliph8 on Thu Dec 05, 2013 11:47 am

In please
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Major SasquatchCaliph8
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 12:43 pm
Location: Mountains of West Virginia

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby IcePack on Thu Dec 05, 2013 12:29 pm

In please
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
User avatar
Major IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16636
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby hiitsmestevie1 on Thu Dec 05, 2013 1:03 pm

in.please
Image
A relationship is like playing doubles *flat rate or esc*..If you don't have a good partner, you better have a good hand!
User avatar
Lieutenant hiitsmestevie1
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:07 pm
Location: connecticut

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby Clanlord Carl on Thu Dec 05, 2013 2:38 pm

I'd like to enter....
User avatar
Major Clanlord Carl
 
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2007 3:04 pm
3

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby chapcrap on Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:32 pm

After speaking with bigWham, we've decided to amend the entry process only slightly to allow those players who have won at least five 1v1 tournaments into this automatically. However, if a lot of them sign up, we will only take the top 24 1v1 tournament winners from that group. After that, score will be the tiebreaker.
Lieutenant chapcrap
 
Posts: 9686
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Location: Kansas City

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby alaskanassassin on Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:43 pm

chapcrap wrote:After speaking with bigWham, we've decided to amend the entry process only slightly to allow those players who have won at least five 1v1 tournaments into this automatically. However, if a lot of them sign up, we will only take the top 24 1v1 tournament winners from that group. After that, score will be the tiebreaker.


I like the adjustment. People now have 3 ways to get in, qualifier, score, or 1 v 1 tourney wins.
Dice stats are irrelevant. If I roll the same amount of 6's as everyone else, but my opponents role 6's at the same time, that's what matters, what's rolled opposite my dice. How about how many total guys I've won and lost while attacking?
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class alaskanassassin
 
Posts: 860
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:16 pm

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby Jippd on Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:49 pm

chapcrap wrote:After speaking with bigWham, we've decided to amend the entry process only slightly to allow those players who have won at least five 1v1 tournaments into this automatically. However, if a lot of them sign up, we will only take the top 24 1v1 tournament winners from that group. After that, score will be the tiebreaker.


So what will you do for a player like me who might qualify based on overall score and I have also won at least 5 1 v 1 tournaments. How will you decide my entry method? Just wondering from a logistical standpoint, I'm hoping I will get in one way or another.

Possible solution is to accept entries in this order:

Take those that win from the satellites>Take the top score based entrants>take the remaining applicants that didn't qualify for score and then take the top 24 that have won at least 5 1 v 1 tournaments
Image
User avatar
Major Jippd
 
Posts: 1384
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:05 pm

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby azak848 on Thu Dec 05, 2013 4:20 pm

in please
User avatar
Major azak848
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:16 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby BluU on Thu Dec 05, 2013 4:20 pm

in please
Major BluU
 
Posts: 2046
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 10:06 am

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby Namliam on Thu Dec 05, 2013 4:23 pm

count me in
Image
User avatar
Colonel Namliam
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:19 pm
Location: Wyoming \,,/(>_<)\,,/

Re: The Championships - 1v1

Postby chapcrap on Thu Dec 05, 2013 4:24 pm

Jippd wrote:
chapcrap wrote:After speaking with bigWham, we've decided to amend the entry process only slightly to allow those players who have won at least five 1v1 tournaments into this automatically. However, if a lot of them sign up, we will only take the top 24 1v1 tournament winners from that group. After that, score will be the tiebreaker.


So what will you do for a player like me who might qualify based on overall score and I have also won at least 5 1 v 1 tournaments. How will you decide my entry method? Just wondering from a logistical standpoint, I'm hoping I will get in one way or another.

Possible solution is to accept entries in this order:

Take those that win from the satellites>Take the top score based entrants>take the remaining applicants that didn't qualify for score and then take the top 24 that have won at least 5 1 v 1 tournaments


I'll take the qualifiers first for sure. I had been planning on taking the tournament winners next and then go off of score. I'm not really sure how many of the tournament winners we'll get in here. We've had about 120 people eligible for that. Why do you propose to do score first?

#Jippd
Lieutenant chapcrap
 
Posts: 9686
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Location: Kansas City

PreviousNext

Return to Super Events/Special Tournaments

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users