Actually, I'm finding most of the color schemes confusing.cairnswk wrote:Yes Gilliagn...if you check back starting on p2,3 etc you'll see that was one of the first thing discussed....and that continued right up to about 5-8 pages back. Have a look, and see if that satisfies your question.Gilligan wrote:I'm thinking that some of the colors are too close to each other. Have you tried different colors?
Battle For Australia [Quenched]
Moderator: Cartographers
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Yes that's why they have ended up as what they are now. There were several attempts as you can see to define better colours each continent.Gilligan wrote:Actually, I'm finding most of the color schemes confusing.cairnswk wrote:Yes Gilliagn...if you check back starting on p2,3 etc you'll see that was one of the first thing discussed....and that continued right up to about 5-8 pages back. Have a look, and see if that satisfies your question.Gilligan wrote:I'm thinking that some of the colors are too close to each other. Have you tried different colors?
Can you explain further what you think needs attending to in the current colours.

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
Gladly.cairnswk wrote:Yes that's why they have ended up as what they are now. There were several attempts as you can see to define better colours each continent.Gilligan wrote:Actually, I'm finding most of the color schemes confusing.cairnswk wrote:Yes Gilliagn...if you check back starting on p2,3 etc you'll see that was one of the first thing discussed....and that continued right up to about 5-8 pages back. Have a look, and see if that satisfies your question.Gilligan wrote:I'm thinking that some of the colors are too close to each other. Have you tried different colors?
Can you explain further what you think needs attending to in the current colours.
Imperial Japan is fine.
Solomons is fine.
Bismarcks is fine.
Is West Australia bottom left?
Allied Navy is fine.
Maybe East Australia can be a different shade of green so it is not so close to W. Australia?
I don't see a N. New Guinea.
East Indies is fine.
New Guinea and Papua are fine, but I think that some people will have trouble distinguishing them.

West Australia...bottom left yes...Gilligan wrote:Gladly.cairnswk wrote:Yes that's why they have ended up as what they are now. There were several attempts as you can see to define better colours each continent.Gilligan wrote:Actually, I'm finding most of the color schemes confusing.cairnswk wrote:Yes Gilliagn...if you check back starting on p2,3 etc you'll see that was one of the first thing discussed....and that continued right up to about 5-8 pages back. Have a look, and see if that satisfies your question.Gilligan wrote:I'm thinking that some of the colors are too close to each other. Have you tried different colors?
Can you explain further what you think needs attending to in the current colours.![]()
Imperial Japan is fine.
Solomons is fine.
Bismarcks is fine.
Is West Australia bottom left?
Allied Navy is fine.
Maybe East Australia can be a different shade of green so it is not so close to W. Australia?
I don't see a N. New Guinea.![]()
East Indies is fine.
New Guinea and Papua are fine, but I think that some people will have trouble distinguishing them.
and you are right...the colours are not those advertised in the legend.
I'll fix that this evening after work. Thanks for picking that up...sometimes one needs new eyes that aren't so close...

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
Anytime cairns!cairnswk wrote:West Australia...bottom left yes...Gilligan wrote:Gladly.cairnswk wrote:Yes that's why they have ended up as what they are now. There were several attempts as you can see to define better colours each continent.Gilligan wrote:Actually, I'm finding most of the color schemes confusing.cairnswk wrote:Yes Gilliagn...if you check back starting on p2,3 etc you'll see that was one of the first thing discussed....and that continued right up to about 5-8 pages back. Have a look, and see if that satisfies your question.Gilligan wrote:I'm thinking that some of the colors are too close to each other. Have you tried different colors?
Can you explain further what you think needs attending to in the current colours.![]()
Imperial Japan is fine.
Solomons is fine.
Bismarcks is fine.
Is West Australia bottom left?
Allied Navy is fine.
Maybe East Australia can be a different shade of green so it is not so close to W. Australia?
I don't see a N. New Guinea.![]()
East Indies is fine.
New Guinea and Papua are fine, but I think that some people will have trouble distinguishing them.
and you are right...the colours are not those advertised in the legend.
I'll fix that this evening after work. Thanks for picking that up...sometimes one needs new eyes that aren't so close...

V25 update. Fix colours
Gilligan (and Splash), sorry about the muck with the colours.Gilligan wrote:Look from the top of this page to the bottom.Splash wrote:I am not sure if this has been mentioned before ( i didn't take the time to look through the whole thing) but I don't think there IS a N. NEWGUINEA
Below is a fix for that and Gilligan, I have altered the colour of eastern Australia to accentuate its difference...more limey green i think.


* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
Re: V25 update. Fix colours
Much better! Much more easily distinguishable. And there's a N. New Guineacairnswk wrote:Gilligan (and Splash), sorry about the muck with the colours.Gilligan wrote:Look from the top of this page to the bottom.Splash wrote:I am not sure if this has been mentioned before ( i didn't take the time to look through the whole thing) but I don't think there IS a N. NEWGUINEA
Below is a fix for that and Gilligan, I have altered the colour of eastern Australia to accentuate its difference...more limey green i think.

Re: V25 update. Fix colours
Yeh...good muck up by me...good pickup by you!Gilligan wrote: Much better! Much more easily distinguishable. And there's a N. New Guinea

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
Solomons is the same thing as East Indies, except with 2 more countries. It has the same borders to defend, 3. And New Guinea has more borders to defend, 4, but has lower bonus?cairnswk wrote:Mmmm...I'm kind of happy with the numbers as they are....any reason for your suggestion or how do you calculate this.Gilligan wrote:I was thinking Solomons be a +3, and New Guinea be a +4.
And do not be sorry about the colors

- unriggable
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Gilligan...I'd still prefer to leave as they are on the basis of the below:Gilligan wrote:Solomons is the same thing as East Indies, except with 2 more countries. It has the same borders to defend, 3. And New Guinea has more borders to defend, 4, but has lower bonus?cairnswk wrote:Mmmm...I'm kind of happy with the numbers as they are....any reason for your suggestion or how do you calculate this.Gilligan wrote:I was thinking Solomons be a +3, and New Guinea be a +4.
And do not be sorry about the colors
N New Guinea 5 Terts 3 Def 5 AttRts 2 n'bors 24Ttl 6 Div 3.00 Result 3
Solomons 8 Terts 3 Def 3 AttRts 3 N'bors 6 Div 3.75 Result 4
East Indies 6 Terts 3 Def 3 AttRts 1 N'bor 6 Div Result 3

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
- unriggable
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm


