Moderator: Community Team
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:2 votes and someone intentionally voted iliad to spite me. Obviously you are all out to get me. Well go ahead *Draws sword*. Come get me, I could easily take on each one of you.
Vote fir Just so I can avoid the OMGus vote.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
The Weird One wrote:strike wolf wrote:2 votes and someone intentionally voted iliad to spite me. Obviously you are all out to get me. Well go ahead *Draws sword*. Come get me, I could easily take on each one of you.
Vote fir Just so I can avoid the OMGus vote.
He has bared steel. He clearly intends to slay us all! Unvote Vote strike wolf
Wrong fantasy world.safariguy5 wrote:Are you not entertained? Is this not why you are here?
Flow520 wrote:UnvoteWrong fantasy world.safariguy5 wrote:Are you not entertained? Is this not why you are here?![]()
Vote safariguy5
IMHO, history distorted by Hollywood tends to be more akin with fantasy. Ancient history doubly sosafariguy5 wrote:Flow520 wrote:UnvoteWrong fantasy world.safariguy5 wrote:Are you not entertained? Is this not why you are here?![]()
Vote safariguy5
Fantasy? Who said anything about fantasy, that's ancient history bud.
So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something?jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
spiesr wrote:So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something?jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
*Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
jonty125 wrote:spiesr wrote:So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something?jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
*Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
I have no idea what my WC let me check, unvote vote safariguy5 because his name is in yellow.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
spiesr wrote:So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something?jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
*Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
Commander9 wrote:3. Do not quote any PM's you receive from the moderator or another player. You may say your name, role, associated abilities. Do *not* claim your victory conditions. This is a serious offence and could earn you a mod-kill, and/or a blacklist from future games.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:[spiesr wrote:So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something?jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
*Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
I don't want to be the busy body here, but it states this in the rulesCommander9 wrote:3. Do not quote any PM's you receive from the moderator or another player. You may say your name, role, associated abilities. Do *not* claim your victory conditions. This is a serious offence and could earn you a mod-kill, and/or a blacklist from future games.
Commander can affirm what I'm saying, whether it's true or not but until then I say we drop the victory con talking
No, his post was obviously a joke. I will however be keeping it in the back of my mind when evaluating Jonty's actions going forward. Also, it wasn't so much a question as an accusation.The Weird One wrote:Honestly, though, do you really expect an answer to that question, spiesr?
nagerous wrote:I've been away all weekend and am just catching up but it looks like there is sweet f all to catch up on bar a no lynch post which I am going to assume is a joke. In absence of better leads vote stays on fircoal.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
spiesr wrote:So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something?jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
*Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:spiesr wrote:So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something?jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
*Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
FOS Spiesr. You've been in enough games with Jonty to realize that voting no lynch is currently a staple of his joke vote activities, whether he is scum, town or 3rd party. Really not worth investigating.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
strike wolf wrote:spiesr wrote:So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something?jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
*Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
FOS Spiesr. You've been in enough games with Jonty to realize that voting no lynch is currently a staple of his joke vote activities, whether he is scum, town or 3rd party. Really not worth investigating.
jonty125 wrote:strike wolf wrote:spiesr wrote:So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something?jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
*Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
FOS Spiesr. You've been in enough games with Jonty to realize that voting no lynch is currently a staple of his joke vote activities, whether he is scum, town or 3rd party. Really not worth investigating.
Yeah I lack creativity, but a FOS, harsh.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:jonty125 wrote:strike wolf wrote:spiesr wrote:So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something?jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
*Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
FOS Spiesr. You've been in enough games with Jonty to realize that voting no lynch is currently a staple of his joke vote activities, whether he is scum, town or 3rd party. Really not worth investigating.
Yeah I lack creativity, but a FOS, harsh.
I wasn't FOSing you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users