Hensow wrote:In my book the amount of time befor my first post is about as good as any reson you'll have on day one
And you are saying??.....
Moderator: Community Team
Hensow wrote:In my book the amount of time befor my first post is about as good as any reson you'll have on day one
Iron Butterfly wrote:Hensow wrote:In my book the amount of time befor my first post is about as good as any reson you'll have on day one
And you are saying??.....
safariguy5 wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:Hensow wrote:In my book the amount of time befor my first post is about as good as any reson you'll have on day one
And you are saying??.....
Again with the whole "wait until a case is presented by someone else". If you're mafia, that's a perfect way to not draw attention to yourself because the more you talk the more likely you are to make a mistake/draw a cop investigation on yourself.
Pretty sure I'm already voting him but just in case (and seriously this time)
unvote vote Hensow
spiesr wrote:Vote gregwolf121 based on projected activity levels.
Hensow wrote:In my book the amount of time befor my first post is about as good as any reson you'll have on day one
Not really, it was mostly a joke vote, although if somebody has to get semi-random lynched it might as well be a chronically inactive player.thechuck51 wrote:spiesr wrote:Vote gregwolf121 based on projected activity levels.
Missed this post before. Are you advocating a policy lynch?
spiesr wrote:Not really, it was mostly a joke vote, although if somebody has to get semi-random lynched it might as well be a chronically inactive player.thechuck51 wrote:spiesr wrote:Vote gregwolf121 based on projected activity levels.
Missed this post before. Are you advocating a policy lynch?
gregwolf121 wrote:spiesr wrote:Not really, it was mostly a joke vote, although if somebody has to get semi-random lynched it might as well be a chronically inactive player.thechuck51 wrote:spiesr wrote:Vote gregwolf121 based on projected activity levels.
Missed this post before. Are you advocating a policy lynch?
thanks for the vote of confidence
kgb007 wrote:gregwolf121 wrote:spiesr wrote:Not really, it was mostly a joke vote, although if somebody has to get semi-random lynched it might as well be a chronically inactive player.thechuck51 wrote:spiesr wrote:Vote gregwolf121 based on projected activity levels.
Missed this post before. Are you advocating a policy lynch?
thanks for the vote of confidence
vote gregwolf121 how else would you suggest we get some activity out of you?
it took thechuck questioning a joke vote and spiesr's response before you chimed in, without anything useful to add
kgb007 wrote:gregwolf121 wrote:spiesr wrote:Not really, it was mostly a joke vote, although if somebody has to get semi-random lynched it might as well be a chronically inactive player.thechuck51 wrote:spiesr wrote:Vote gregwolf121 based on projected activity levels.
Missed this post before. Are you advocating a policy lynch?
thanks for the vote of confidence
vote gregwolf121 how else would you suggest we get some activity out of you?
it took thechuck questioning a joke vote and spiesr's response before you chimed in, without anything useful to add
gregwolf121 wrote:well i didn't see a need to respond to the joke vote, cause thats what i took it as a joke, and about the only case there is right now is on hensow, who seems slightly scummy but not enough, IMO, to warrant a vote, yet.
and i understand kgb that your prodding for results to see if ill rise to the bait and if i seem scummy or not, but it all seems a bit hypocrtical to me, cause i could make the same case against almost anyone in the game right now, for example spiesr, confirms, joke vote and an explanation of joke vote, kgb, confirm, joke vote, what looks like a semi-serious vote, a redaction of said vote, and a call for me to be more active, (and i might add after being prodded.) i could go on but it would be redundant to do so
as i said before the only one who has really posted a worth while case has been safari.
my thoughts on scum at this point is hensow, see saf's case
then their is ghostly who has only confirmed, i think it would be better to try and get him replaced, rather than lynch him outright
well since we really don't have much to go on i'll go ahead and unvote, vote hensow, by my count that puts him at L-3
kgb007 wrote:gregwolf121 wrote:well i didn't see a need to respond to the joke vote, cause thats what i took it as a joke, and about the only case there is right now is on hensow, who seems slightly scummy but not enough, IMO, to warrant a vote, yet.
and i understand kgb that your prodding for results to see if ill rise to the bait and if i seem scummy or not, but it all seems a bit hypocrtical to me, cause i could make the same case against almost anyone in the game right now, for example spiesr, confirms, joke vote and an explanation of joke vote, kgb, confirm, joke vote, what looks like a semi-serious vote, a redaction of said vote, and a call for me to be more active, (and i might add after being prodded.) i could go on but it would be redundant to do so
as i said before the only one who has really posted a worth while case has been safari.
my thoughts on scum at this point is hensow, see saf's case
then their is ghostly who has only confirmed, i think it would be better to try and get him replaced, rather than lynch him outright
well since we really don't have much to go on i'll go ahead and unvote, vote hensow, by my count that puts him at L-3
wait...what? first you say hensow's behavior doesn't warrant your vote, and then you close a rather convoluted defense by voting hensow?
as for me being prodded, i posted Thursday and then enjoyed my weekend as i'm sure everyone else did!!
dazza2008 wrote:Is hensow new to mafia? If he is I can forgive that kind of thing but if he has played before it looks not too good to me.
Hensow wrote:In my book the amount of time befor my first post is about as good as any reson you'll have on day one
thechuck51 wrote:dazza2008 wrote:Is hensow new to mafia? If he is I can forgive that kind of thing but if he has played before it looks not too good to me.
I'm pretty sure I've played with him before but I don't remember what game(s).
@kgb, what are your thoughts on this post by hensow?Hensow wrote:In my book the amount of time befor my first post is about as good as any reson you'll have on day one
I'm curious that you haven't commented on it and are instead trying to redirect attention to gregwolf.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users