Moderator: Community Team
The fact that you feel you need to isolate this one rather insignificant fact out of all the historical inaccuracies speaks volumes on where your priorities lie.Night Strike wrote:In what way?Nola_Lifer wrote:Seems history shows that Night Strike is still racist as all hell.
Lootifer wrote:The fact that you feel you need to isolate this one rather insignificant fact out of all the historical inaccuracies speaks volumes on where your priorities lie.Night Strike wrote:In what way?Nola_Lifer wrote:Seems history shows that Night Strike is still racist as all hell.

No, but his understanding of his religion, perhaps. There is currently no "church of Nightstrike".notyou2 wrote:Lootifer wrote:The fact that you feel you need to isolate this one rather insignificant fact out of all the historical inaccuracies speaks volumes on where your priorities lie.Night Strike wrote:In what way?Nola_Lifer wrote:Seems history shows that Night Strike is still racist as all hell.
It's not his fault. It's HIS fault. His religion made him this way.
No, but his understanding of his religion, perhaps. There is currently no "church of Nightstrike".notyou2 wrote:Lootifer wrote:The fact that you feel you need to isolate this one rather insignificant fact out of all the historical inaccuracies speaks volumes on where your priorities lie.Night Strike wrote:In what way?Nola_Lifer wrote:Seems history shows that Night Strike is still racist as all hell.
It's not his fault. It's HIS fault. His religion made him this way.
They were not, because they entered into it "voluntarily" (often to pay for passage here, for example) and because there was always at least the theory of working off the debt and obtaining freedom. Even if the freedom was sometimes more reality than illusion, the fact that it was there did make a difference. Also, there tended to be more limits on how indentured servants could be treated, though just like in slavery (or paid work, for that matter) they were often abusedLootifer wrote:Also I really like how indentured servants are not slaves...
lolwut
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
and modern farmers have no actual incentives to keep their livestock aliveIliad wrote:Also the working conditions and life expectancy meant that your chance of actually survivign those 7 years were very low especially given that your masters who were in charge of your well-being had no actual incentives to keep you alive.
warmonger1981 wrote:Were there not slaves all throughout history far before America came to be? Egypt or Rome maybe? Slavery is used as a tool for political and religious gain.
What on earth are you trying to imply with this? You're clearly philosophising about something.Phatscotty wrote:It used to be a rough world, eh?
What a mistake it continues to be judging all of history through the rosiest colored lens's possible
Is he saying that today is equally as tough? I am not sure.Iliad wrote:What on earth are you trying to imply with this? You're clearly philosophising about something.Phatscotty wrote:It used to be a rough world, eh?
What a mistake it continues to be judging all of history through the rosiest colored lens's possible
Not trying to nitpick but those two comments dont match up.Phatscotty wrote:It used to be a rough world, eh?
What a mistake it continues to be judging all of history through the rosiest colored lens's possible
Yes, but the chances of even "free" working folks was generally low, too.Iliad wrote:Also the working conditions and life expectancy meant that your chance of actually survivign those 7 years were very low especially given that your masters who were in charge of your well-being had no actual incentives to keep you alive.
Anyone who doesn't agree with him.Lootifer wrote:But your second comment is odd; who are these people judging history with rose tinted glasses?
Prejudice.AAFitz wrote:Actually, Id like to defend NS here for showing the most non-racist post he has ever posted, in showing that indeed some africans can be just as evil as some of other races, especially the white ones.
Indeed, the worst prejudice white people can face is sometimes being reminded of the institutional racism that were the foundation blocks for their nations.BigBallinStalin wrote:Prejudice.AAFitz wrote:Actually, Id like to defend NS here for showing the most non-racist post he has ever posted, in showing that indeed some africans can be just as evil as some of other races, especially the white ones.
Is it bad that I first read this as "foundation blacks for their nations?"Iliad wrote:Indeed, the worst prejudice white people can face is sometimes being reminded of the institutional racism that were the foundation blocks for their nations.BigBallinStalin wrote:Prejudice.AAFitz wrote:Actually, Id like to defend NS here for showing the most non-racist post he has ever posted, in showing that indeed some africans can be just as evil as some of other races, especially the white ones.
I believe you are misinterpreting what I wrote.PLAYER57832 wrote:No, but his understanding of his religion, perhaps. There is currently no "church of Nightstrike".notyou2 wrote:Lootifer wrote:The fact that you feel you need to isolate this one rather insignificant fact out of all the historical inaccuracies speaks volumes on where your priorities lie.Night Strike wrote:In what way?Nola_Lifer wrote:Seems history shows that Night Strike is still racist as all hell.
It's not his fault. It's HIS fault. His religion made him this way.
