7 UP II [TPA3] [COMPLETE]
Moderator: Tournament Directors
-
Chariot of Fire
- Posts: 3692
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Buckinghamshire U.K.
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
Great update Dave, cheers.
Nice to see those Monkis getting spanked in R3 and 7OFU regaining its rightful place (ahem).
Nice to see those Monkis getting spanked in R3 and 7OFU regaining its rightful place (ahem).

Highest position #5 (18 Nov 2010) General 4,380pts (11 Dec 2010)
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
Hm, are you sure DaveH that my team gained only so few points on round 3?!

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
26 points is pretty good! Perhaps you would like to donate a few to my team?skillfull wrote:Hm, are you sure DaveH that my team gained only so few points on round 3?!
You can check the winning games and points on my main thread - and the games in case I have not put in the correct result.
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
Game 12716272 - game does not exist. Was this a game which was forfeit due to player not joining? If so, why does it show a win for frenchie in round 10? Skillfull had posted earlier and the reply was that games were forfeited so my guess is this is a mistake?DaveH wrote:26 points is pretty good! Perhaps you would like to donate a few to my team?skillfull wrote:Hm, are you sure DaveH that my team gained only so few points on round 3?!![]()
You can check the winning games and points on my main thread - and the games in case I have not put in the correct result.
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
Damn - yes a mistake! Well spotted! TSM have 7 points more; Frenchie 7 fewer - I have amended the points tables accordingly.friendly1 wrote:Game 12716272 - game does not exist. Was this a game which was forfeit due to player not joining? If so, why does it show a win for frenchie in round 10? Skillfull had posted earlier and the reply was that games were forfeited so my guess is this is a mistake?
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
For forfeit games should we not get points for winning in fewer than 10 rounds. It's not really fair we have to be punished for them not joining...
Best Score: 2799, Best Rank: Colonel, Best Scoreboard Spot: 126
Funniest Game:Game 1675072
Sickest Game:Game 2975352
Funniest Game:Game 1675072
Sickest Game:Game 2975352
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
It is a good point and one I gave some thought to. However, I don't think that the full 10 points is appropriate, as the 3 extra are, in my view, for excellent play which you cannot demonstrate. The situation though, if not resolved, may mean that I have to negate all their points, won and lost, which would be entirely fair.kratos644 wrote:For forfeit games should we not get points for winning in fewer than 10 rounds. It's not really fair we have to be punished for them not joining...
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
But see our play was so excellent that the other team didn't want to fill the game. I'd say that's quite the demonstration.DaveH wrote:It is a good point and one I gave some thought to. However, I don't think that the full 10 points is appropriate, as the 3 extra are, in my view, for excellent play which you cannot demonstrate. The situation though, if not resolved, may mean that I have to negate all their points, won and lost, which would be entirely fair.kratos644 wrote:For forfeit games should we not get points for winning in fewer than 10 rounds. It's not really fair we have to be punished for them not joining...
Best Score: 2799, Best Rank: Colonel, Best Scoreboard Spot: 126
Funniest Game:Game 1675072
Sickest Game:Game 2975352
Funniest Game:Game 1675072
Sickest Game:Game 2975352
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
kratos644 wrote:But see our play was so excellent that the other team didn't want to fill the game. I'd say that's quite the demonstration.DaveH wrote:It is a good point and one I gave some thought to. However, I don't think that the full 10 points is appropriate, as the 3 extra are, in my view, for excellent play which you cannot demonstrate. The situation though, if not resolved, may mean that I have to negate all their points, won and lost, which would be entirely fair.kratos644 wrote:For forfeit games should we not get points for winning in fewer than 10 rounds. It's not really fair we have to be punished for them not joining...
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
kratos644 wrote:But see our play was so excellent that the other team didn't want to fill the game. I'd say that's quite the demonstration.DaveH wrote:It is a good point and one I gave some thought to. However, I don't think that the full 10 points is appropriate, as the 3 extra are, in my view, for excellent play which you cannot demonstrate. The situation though, if not resolved, may mean that I have to negate all their points, won and lost, which would be entirely fair.kratos644 wrote:For forfeit games should we not get points for winning in fewer than 10 rounds. It's not really fair we have to be punished for them not joining...
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
Thanks Simon for waking me up and made me see there was a mistake!Chariot of Fire wrote:Great update Dave, cheers.
Nice to see those Monkis getting spanked in R3 and 7OFU regaining its rightful place (ahem).
Last edited by skillfull on Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

-
Chariot of Fire
- Posts: 3692
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Buckinghamshire U.K.
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
dangnabbit!

Highest position #5 (18 Nov 2010) General 4,380pts (11 Dec 2010)
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
Can we at least choose our new teammate ? You filled a game with 2 stangers. We will give you names soon.
TY
TY
Highlights
Best Score: 3509 19/06/14, 5746 completed, 2583 (45%) won
Best Rank: 35th 18/06/14, 3rd in Canada 18/06/14 LHDD NC4 Winner
Best Rank: 35th 18/06/14, 3rd in Canada 18/06/14 LHDD NC4 Winner
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
No problem - but It was on May 27th that I brought his absence to your attention and the only response was from darkseb's sitter who asked for him to be replaced!ttblanch wrote:Can we at least choose our new teammate ? You filled a game with 2 stangers. We will give you names soon.
TY
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
think we might get an update on scores dave? I know its a lot to ask and especially of someone who rescued the tournament already ... just curious is all and I assume the last 2 round 4 games and a few round 5 games have finished by now. 
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
slytown wrote:think we might get an update on scores dave? I know its a lot to ask and especially of someone who rescued the tournament already ... just curious is all and I assume the last 2 round 4 games and a few round 5 games have finished by now.
Round 4 scores
totals so far
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
Game 12905421 invites got messed up, I have the wrong partners.
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
That's a strange one - code is OK though. I'll set up a new game and invite directly.aad0906 wrote:Game 12905421 invites got messed up, I have the wrong partners.
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
Invites sent again!skillfull wrote:Again!
Both games haven't started....we are waiting one player.
Game 12905429
Game 12905460
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
Osujacket is away till Sunday, what should we do? W8 till his gets back or join in for him?

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
Armandolas has replaced Fulch in our team as previously stated, but Fulch has received this rounds invites. Can you please resend invites or PW for games to Armandolas?
Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
Tell me what to do because i am his sitter.skillfull wrote:Osujacket is away till Sunday, what should we do? W8 till his gets back or join in for him?

Re: 7 UP II [TPA3] [Ongoing]
Now, I'm no authority, but If I'd suggest you go to his inbox, look at the two PM's from DaveH, and join his two games.skillfull wrote:Tell me what to do because i am his sitter.skillfull wrote:Osujacket is away till Sunday, what should we do? W8 till his gets back or join in for him?
I can't see why you shouldn't do this as a sitter. This is a tournament, and as such you are allowed to join games from the person you sit for. The fact that the TO has sent the links in a PM instead of directly inviting the person should be of no consequence.

