Moderator: Community Team
greenoaks wrote:chapcrap wrote:It seems to me that GC Medals would be more appropriate than GA Medals.
you are correct, GC's are currently given out. i would like to see them become SC's (Suggestion Contribution)
i got this one a few years agoAward Time: Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:06 am
Awarded by: clapper011
Award Reason: Contributed significantly to the discussions in the Suggestions Forum
it is my one and only GC but i would swap it in a heartbeat for the lightbulb in the 1st post
Dukasaur wrote:greenoaks wrote:chapcrap wrote:It seems to me that GC Medals would be more appropriate than GA Medals.
you are correct, GC's are currently given out. i would like to see them become SC's (Suggestion Contribution)
i got this one a few years agoAward Time: Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:06 am
Awarded by: clapper011
Award Reason: Contributed significantly to the discussions in the Suggestions Forum
it is my one and only GC but i would swap it in a heartbeat for the lightbulb in the 1st post
There seems to be an inconsistency there. It was my understanding that the movers of implemented suggestions got GCs, but none were awarded to any of the people last year whose suggestions were implemented. I took it up with Andy Dufresne, who responded in a PM that it was never the practise. I'm sure that's wrong, because I've seen people who had those GCs, but I can't remember who, and my forum search skills suck, so I dropped the matter.
It seems it was once the practise, but at some point was dropped and forgotten. Perhaps someone with more free time and/or better forum search skills than me could research this and see exactly when and why the practise ended?
I'm all in favour of resuming it, but we should do so retroactively.
And if the GCs are replaced with a new SC medal, I'd be okay with that also, although I don't see it as a priority.
chapcrap wrote:As far as this idea goes in general, I think we'd have to set up certain criteria that would need to be met before a medal would be awarded. All posts would have to be addressed. The OP would need to be kept current and updated as things were changing in the thread and discussion. So, while I love medals and would love to see this come to fruition, a little more structure needs to be nailed down first.
DoomYoshi wrote:I have a suggestion medal.
nicestash wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:I have a suggestion medal.
Hahaha, priceless!
chapcrap wrote:As far as the policy goes, I can speak to that. I don't think GC's have ever been given out for Suggestions in general. There have been medals given out in the past for individuals who have proven to be helpful in the forum and extremely helpful in getting specific suggestions implemented. However, it wasn't just that a medal was given for nominating an idea that was pushed through.
As far as this idea goes in general, I think we'd have to set up certain criteria that would need to be met before a medal would be awarded. All posts would have to be addressed. The OP would need to be kept current and updated as things were changing in the thread and discussion. So, while I love medals and would love to see this come to fruition, a little more structure needs to be nailed down first.
Award Time: Fri Feb 08, 2013 10:58 am
Awarded by: rdsrds2120
Award Reason:
Your suggestion was posted, improved, and approved in like a day. It, along with the process, was totally rad.
DoomYoshi wrote:nicestash wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:I have a suggestion medal.
Hahaha, priceless!
I'm not sure I understand the humor. I really do.
nicestash wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:nicestash wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:I have a suggestion medal.
Hahaha, priceless!
I'm not sure I understand the humor. I really do.
I know, I saw it. I find it hilarious that there's been such a negative response over a suggestion medal, and you're sitting on one
That being said, I believe that if we're going to hand out medals for making a suggestion, we need to also hand them out to the people who add suggestions and help modify them. Overall, it's going to add a lot of medals.
nicestash wrote:You could just choose whoever seemed like they were the most helpful in developing the suggestion.
greenoaks wrote:nicestash wrote:You could just choose whoever seemed like they were the most helpful in developing the suggestion.
sugs mods are excluded
thehippo8 wrote:I'm for this idea and an appropriate criteria. I see no reason why suggs can't have their own medals. They choose the driteria, they implement the process, they maintain consistency and we all win!
Incidentally, aside from suggs medals ... I'd like to see suggs mesh more with media. Each time a promising new suggestion comes along pleas let me or one of the other media staff know and we can drive traffic this way through twitter/facebook or even an article in Dispatch if warranted. The more the idea is bashed around the more valid it will be and the more meaningful any medal award will be. We can also announce implemented suggestions and if you like award recipients!
thehippo8 wrote:I'm for this idea and an appropriate criteria. I see no reason why suggs can't have their own medals. They choose the driteria, they implement the process, they maintain consistency and we all win!
Incidentally, aside from suggs medals ... I'd like to see suggs mesh more with media. Each time a promising new suggestion comes along pleas let me or one of the other media staff know and we can drive traffic this way through twitter/facebook or even an article in Dispatch if warranted. The more the idea is bashed around the more valid it will be and the more meaningful any medal award will be. We can also announce implemented suggestions and if you like award recipients!
chapcrap wrote:thehippo8 wrote:I'm for this idea and an appropriate criteria. I see no reason why suggs can't have their own medals. They choose the criteria, they implement the process, they maintain consistency and we all win!
Incidentally, aside from suggs medals ... I'd like to see suggs mesh more with media. Each time a promising new suggestion comes along pleas let me or one of the other media staff know and we can drive traffic this way through twitter/facebook or even an article in Dispatch if warranted. The more the idea is bashed around the more valid it will be and the more meaningful any medal award will be. We can also announce implemented suggestions and if you like award recipients!
That's not our call. I think rds can leak whatever information he wanted. He knows what is going on.
thehippo8 wrote:chapcrap wrote:thehippo8 wrote:I'm for this idea and an appropriate criteria. I see no reason why suggs can't have their own medals. They choose the criteria, they implement the process, they maintain consistency and we all win!
Incidentally, aside from suggs medals ... I'd like to see suggs mesh more with media. Each time a promising new suggestion comes along pleas let me or one of the other media staff know and we can drive traffic this way through twitter/facebook or even an article in Dispatch if warranted. The more the idea is bashed around the more valid it will be and the more meaningful any medal award will be. We can also announce implemented suggestions and if you like award recipients!
That's not our call. I think rds can leak whatever information he wanted. He knows what is going on.
Without going off track too much, you may want to read what I said again. How would rds know if a suggestion was promising or when input was desired on any topic? The suggs mods are best placed to monitor these things but I'd welcome input from anyone!
blakebowling wrote:thehippo8 wrote:chapcrap wrote:thehippo8 wrote:I'm for this idea and an appropriate criteria. I see no reason why suggs can't have their own medals. They choose the criteria, they implement the process, they maintain consistency and we all win!
Incidentally, aside from suggs medals ... I'd like to see suggs mesh more with media. Each time a promising new suggestion comes along pleas let me or one of the other media staff know and we can drive traffic this way through twitter/facebook or even an article in Dispatch if warranted. The more the idea is bashed around the more valid it will be and the more meaningful any medal award will be. We can also announce implemented suggestions and if you like award recipients!
That's not our call. I think rds can leak whatever information he wanted. He knows what is going on.
Without going off track too much, you may want to read what I said again. How would rds know if a suggestion was promising or when input was desired on any topic? The suggs mods are best placed to monitor these things but I'd welcome input from anyone!
I believe chap was talking about the newly implemented / coming soon suggestions.
thehippo8 wrote:blakebowling wrote:thehippo8 wrote:chapcrap wrote:thehippo8 wrote:I'm for this idea and an appropriate criteria. I see no reason why suggs can't have their own medals. They choose the criteria, they implement the process, they maintain consistency and we all win!
Incidentally, aside from suggs medals ... I'd like to see suggs mesh more with media. Each time a promising new suggestion comes along pleas let me or one of the other media staff know and we can drive traffic this way through twitter/facebook or even an article in Dispatch if warranted. The more the idea is bashed around the more valid it will be and the more meaningful any medal award will be. We can also announce implemented suggestions and if you like award recipients!
That's not our call. I think rds can leak whatever information he wanted. He knows what is going on.
Without going off track too much, you may want to read what I said again. How would rds know if a suggestion was promising or when input was desired on any topic? The suggs mods are best placed to monitor these things but I'd welcome input from anyone!
I believe chap was talking about the newly implemented / coming soon suggestions.
Ah, thanks blake, that makes sense. Yes, in that case Chap is 100% right - that would be for blake to leak to the media team. I was meaning if the suggs team found promising ideas in development that you wanted to drive ideas to them we can help with that - it would also give more value to the medals because a wider cross-section of the CC community could have a say.
thehippo8 wrote:blakebowling wrote:thehippo8 wrote:chapcrap wrote:thehippo8 wrote:I'm for this idea and an appropriate criteria. I see no reason why suggs can't have their own medals. They choose the criteria, they implement the process, they maintain consistency and we all win!
Incidentally, aside from suggs medals ... I'd like to see suggs mesh more with media. Each time a promising new suggestion comes along pleas let me or one of the other media staff know and we can drive traffic this way through twitter/facebook or even an article in Dispatch if warranted. The more the idea is bashed around the more valid it will be and the more meaningful any medal award will be. We can also announce implemented suggestions and if you like award recipients!
That's not our call. I think rds can leak whatever information he wanted. He knows what is going on.
Without going off track too much, you may want to read what I said again. How would rds know if a suggestion was promising or when input was desired on any topic? The suggs mods are best placed to monitor these things but I'd welcome input from anyone!
I believe chap was talking about the newly implemented / coming soon suggestions.
Ah, thanks blake, that makes sense. Yes, in that case Chap is 100% right - that would be for blake to leak to the media team. I was meaning if the suggs team found promising ideas in development that you wanted to drive ideas to them we can help with that - it would also give more value to the medals because a wider cross-section of the CC community could have a say.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users