CC is not what it used to be

JBlombier · Post by **JBlombier** » Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:50 pm

bigg chief wrote:Grade 9 was fun , college was more funner though !

Sure, we have freedom of speech. But I lol'ed.

bigg chief · Post by **bigg chief** » Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:07 pm

but I rotflmao !

hmsps · Post by **hmsps** » Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:21 pm

bigg chief wrote: 75 bucks that is almost 2 cases of beer

You told me you drink cocktails Chief. How many Alligator Coolers would you get for $75?

bigg chief · Post by **bigg chief** » Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:41 pm

7.33 to be exact ! We are highly taxed in the province I live in @ 15 %, a 26er of rye is $25.50, a case of bud is $34.95 ,melon liqueur is $19 or $20

hulmey · Post by **hulmey** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:53 am

Johnny Rockets wrote:
hulmey wrote:
Checked my dice stats and i have -66% luck in 3 vs 1 situation's, -58% luck 2 vs 1 and 3 vs 2 have -11% luck. it just totally messes any strategy you might have. Might as well not bother
The Fact that you attack in these situations explains your "luck".

JRock

Don't u attack with 3 dice versus 1? Haha

john9blue · Post by **john9blue** » Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:35 pm

Johnny Rockets wrote:You like to attack a lot of 3v1's? 2v1's?
Send me an invite then, rube.

JRock

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_%28ga ... babilities

Johnny Rockets · Post by **Johnny Rockets** » Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:51 pm

The Voice · Post by **The Voice** » Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:12 pm

I miss Classic Art. My winning percentage was so much better than on Classic.

Funkyterrance · Post by **Funkyterrance** » Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:28 pm

The Voice wrote:I miss Classic Art. My winning percentage was so much better than on Classic.

I wish I could have had a chance to play that map.

rdsrds2120 · Post by **rdsrds2120** » Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:41 pm

Funkyterrance wrote:
The Voice wrote:I miss Classic Art. My winning percentage was so much better than on Classic.
I wish I could have had a chance to play that map.

It was interesting to look at. Like a poorly designed museum floorplan

BMO

Funkyterrance · Post by **Funkyterrance** » Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:46 pm

rdsrds2120 wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
The Voice wrote:I miss Classic Art. My winning percentage was so much better than on Classic.
I wish I could have had a chance to play that map.
It was interesting to look at. Like a poorly designed museum floorplan

BMO

Ouch, lol. I just never got used to the lines joining the terts in the classic map. I feel like having the borders, however ugly the map may be, would make it seem more like the board game. I will probably never know though.

rdsrds2120 · Post by **rdsrds2120** » Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:46 am

Funkyterrance wrote: Ouch, lol. I just never got used to the lines joining the terts in the classic map. I feel like having the borders, however ugly the map may be, would make it seem more like the board game. I will probably never know though.

Sure you will

Click image to enlarge.

BMO

koontz1973 · Post by **koontz1973** » Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:12 am

I miss classic art.

Would be nice to see it back with Classic cities. Maybe each year for a week at the birthday bash.

Gillipig · Post by **Gillipig** » Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:32 am

rdsrds2120 wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote: Ouch, lol. I just never got used to the lines joining the terts in the classic map. I feel like having the borders, however ugly the map may be, would make it seem more like the board game. I will probably never know though.
Sure you will

Click image to enlarge.
BMO

I remember that one....

Funkyterrance · Post by **Funkyterrance** » Sat Jan 05, 2013 1:26 am

rdsrds2120 wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote: Ouch, lol. I just never got used to the lines joining the terts in the classic map. I feel like having the borders, however ugly the map may be, would make it seem more like the board game. I will probably never know though.
Sure you will

Click image to enlarge.
BMO

Cool, thanks, that's half the battle. Now where can I play it?
It does seem to be lacking that certain something, that indefinable "it", but I want a shot at it anyway.

Gillipig · Post by **Gillipig** » Sat Jan 05, 2013 2:16 am

Funkyterrance wrote:
rdsrds2120 wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote: Ouch, lol. I just never got used to the lines joining the terts in the classic map. I feel like having the borders, however ugly the map may be, would make it seem more like the board game. I will probably never know though.
Sure you will

Click image to enlarge.
BMO
Cool, thanks, that's half the battle. Now where can I play it?
It does seem to be lacking that certain something, that indefinable "it", but I want a shot at it anyway.

Here you go:

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sat Jan 05, 2013 8:16 am

classic crap, not classic art. When i remember that i spend 16 month on WWII Europe, and these map are create for 24 hours. Pure classic crap.

Gillipig · Post by **Gillipig** » Sat Jan 05, 2013 8:55 am

qwert wrote:classic crap, not classic art. When i remember that i spend 16 month on WWII Europe, and these map are create for 24 hours. Pure classic crap.

lol, I agree. I go

whenever I see it, or hear people praise it. Anyone can make a map like that, anyone!

Gillipig · Post by **Gillipig** » Sat Jan 05, 2013 9:00 am

AAFitz wrote:
qwert wrote:classic crap, not classic art. When i remember that i spend 16 month on WWII Europe, and these map are create for 24 hours. Pure classic crap.
sorry to say, I enjoy classic art, more than WWII Europe which is overdone, and not made for players as much as mapmakers.

Next time, keep it more simple, and people will enjoy playing it. I respect the art of it, but Im here to play risk, not look at pretty pictures.

Im amazed at how many map makers miss this, and ruin lots of maps, in the effort to make them better. You are even bragging about it here, oblivious to what people actually like, and knocking those who did a great job of providing just that.

Have you ever seen landgrab? Here: http://landgrab.net/landgrab/Home I think this site is better for you. No fancy graphics, just like you want.

koontz1973 · Post by **koontz1973** » Sat Jan 05, 2013 9:25 am

qwert wrote:classic crap, not classic art. When i remember that i spend 16 month on WWII Europe, and these map are create for 24 hours. Pure classic crap.

And you know full well that shapes and art where made quickly to fill the void after the original classic map was taken down.

Neither where great maps, we all know that, but both maps went around the foundry for the above reason. But like art, I would not mind a few games on this one for nostalgia reasons.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sat Jan 05, 2013 10:06 am

koontz1973 wrote:
qwert wrote:classic crap, not classic art. When i remember that i spend 16 month on WWII Europe, and these map are create for 24 hours. Pure classic crap.
And you know full well that shapes and art where made quickly to fill the void after the original classic map was taken down.

Neither where great maps, we all know that, but both maps went around the foundry for the above reason. But like art, I would not mind a few games on this one for nostalgia reasons.

i dont mind for temporary maps, but for all these crap people dont need to be awarded, especially for classic crap. I only can hope that these kind of work never hepend again, and that all work you do in map foundry.
If i do these ,i will refuse any award, because these dont deserve any reward.

AAFitz wrote:

sorry to say, I enjoy classic art, more than WWII Europe which is overdone, and not made for players as much as mapmakers.

Next time, keep it more simple, and people will enjoy playing it. I respect the art of it, but Im here to play risk, not look at pretty pictures.

Im amazed at how many map makers miss this, and ruin lots of maps, in the effort to make them better. You are even bragging about it here, oblivious to what people actually like, and knocking those who did a great job of providing just that.

Im sorry aafitz, but maps like Classic Crap(art), simple maps with zero graphic, are prohibited to be made in regular work,and all map makers who will even try to create similar style are blocked right in beginning,in map foundry. If you want more maps like these, then you need to make some suggestion and to find many voters, to decrease many high standards in map making. If you succeed, then existence of Foundry foreman, will not be need, because everybody will be in position to make these type of maps.

koontz1973 · Post by **koontz1973** » Sat Jan 05, 2013 10:33 am

So in a sense, qwert has proven this thread is true. CC is not what it used to be as maps like these will never be made again.

Funkyterrance · Post by **Funkyterrance** » Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:27 pm

Gillipig wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
rdsrds2120 wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote: Ouch, lol. I just never got used to the lines joining the terts in the classic map. I feel like having the borders, however ugly the map may be, would make it seem more like the board game. I will probably never know though.
Sure you will

Click image to enlarge.
BMO
Cool, thanks, that's half the battle. Now where can I play it?
It does seem to be lacking that certain something, that indefinable "it", but I want a shot at it anyway.
Here you go:

I appreciate your trying to help Gillipig but you haven't been paying attention.

Gillipig · Post by **Gillipig** » Sat Jan 05, 2013 2:06 pm

Funkyterrance wrote:
Gillipig wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
rdsrds2120 wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote: Ouch, lol. I just never got used to the lines joining the terts in the classic map. I feel like having the borders, however ugly the map may be, would make it seem more like the board game. I will probably never know though.
Sure you will

Click image to enlarge.
BMO
Cool, thanks, that's half the battle. Now where can I play it?
It does seem to be lacking that certain something, that indefinable "it", but I want a shot at it anyway.
Here you go:

I appreciate your trying to help Gillipig but you haven't been paying attention.

you're one of a kind funky, one of a kind.

Funkyterrance · Post by **Funkyterrance** » Sat Jan 05, 2013 2:44 pm

Gillipig wrote: you're one of a kind funky, one of a kind.

I did get your joke/point, Gillipig, It's just that I'm looking for the "feel" of the board game. I'm inclined to believe that the Classic Art map would capture this "feel" better than the available classic map.
The classic map is a bit too spider-webby for me to get that old time feeling.

CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be

Re: CC is not what it used to be