Bigoted Organization "Chic-Fil-A" infiltrates facebook

[AndyDufresne]

US Army shatters barriers by naming the first ever lesbian general, Tammy Smith

Anyone else incredibly turned on by this?

I'm considering declaring war on America right now.... (but only if we get to use LSD weaponry)

Sorry, you only to get to use LCD weaponry:




--Andy

[Woodruff]

Ha! Now that's funny.

[Woodruff]

I've recently grown to respect PhatScotty's drastic improvements in weaning himself away from Phatism.
(Yeah, Woodruff, he won't answer your questions probably because he doesn't like your attitude).

That isn't why he won't answer my questions, and you know it (or you should).

[BigBallinStalin]

I've recently grown to respect PhatScotty's drastic improvements in weaning himself away from Phatism.
(Yeah, Woodruff, he won't answer your questions probably because he doesn't like your attitude).

That isn't why he won't answer my questions, and you know it (or you should).

Your attitude negatively affects his perceived value in responding to you, for sure. How much? It is unknown, so we can walk away happy that we're both partially right about this. (cuz I partly agree with you).

[Phatscotty]

Woodruff, this is getting ridiculous. I told you I foed you like 3 weeks ago, and I told you why. I just do not believe you have a single thing to say that is worth one second of my time to read. You are rude and a mega troll. I cannot believe you are still going on and on talking about me. You are totally obsessed and I demand you stop stalking me right this instant!

BBS is only half right. I don't want to read what you type because of your attitude and your trolliness. The other half is that you never even have anything to say except for insults. Why the hell would I read them?

I'm not gonna let you troll me, plain and simple. I'm shuttin you down boy! Trollery denied! Just keep my name outta your mouth. Until you have something worth saying, I'm not interested.

[Woodruff]

Woodruff, this is getting ridiculous. I told you I foed you like 3 weeks ago, and I told you why.

You foe and then unfoe me like you're turning on and off a light switch, so that's become largely irrelevant to whether you're reading my posts or not. In fact, you've shown that even immediately after foeing me, you still read my posts.

I just do not believe you have a single thing to say that is worth one second of my time to read.

Of course you don't, because I directly challenge your hypocricy, and you're unwilling to face up to the challenge.

You are rude and a mega troll.

I certainly CAN be rude, though I don't believe that I consistently am at all. In fact, not even close to consistently. I would also suggest that what you seem to want to excuse away as rudeness is closer to simply being a very direct person (though I do admittedly have my rude moments, when I believe it fits the situation). (Note to thegreekdog regarding troll claims...)

But have you ever wondered why it is that I can engage other, just as conservative posters, and not have the issues that you have? Do you really believe it's just because I don't like you or something? Perhaps a bit of introspection on your part could be valuable...of course, I've suggested that to you before and, not surprisingly, you ignored it.

I cannot believe you are still going on and on talking about me. You are totally obsessed and I demand you stop stalking me right this instant!

I'm not obsessed by you at all, and I'm certainly not stalking you. That is just a ludicrous thing to say. (Note to thegreekdog regarding troll claims...)

BBS is only half right. I don't want to read what you type because of your attitude and your trolliness.

So you've convinced yourself that it's just me and has nothing to do with you. Well done! (Note to thegreekdog regarding troll claims...)

The other half is that you never even have anything to say except for insults. Why the hell would I read them?

If you don't read them, then how can you possibly know that? Yet another Phatscotty inconsistency.

I'm not gonna let you troll me, plain and simple. I'm shuttin you down boy! Trollery denied! Just keep my name outta your mouth. Until you have something worth saying, I'm not interested.

You're especially not interested when I DO have something worth saying...that's the entire summation of the problem. (Note to thegreekdog regarding troll claims...)

[Juan_Bottom]

"We simply believe that the traditional definition of 'drinking fountain' should not change."

[Juan_Bottom]

Chick-Fil-A Agrees To Cease Funding To Anti-Gay Organizations, Chicago LGBT Group Claims

Buying homophobic chicken increased sales for one day by a million percent, but reality is back: Boycotts can last forever.

But there's still more boycotting to be done. Their Corporate office still insists upon separate drinking fountains and bathrooms for gays.

[PLAYER57832]

Did the founder really change his position?

[Night Strike]

Shame on them for appearing to submit to illegal demands from city governments.

[Juan_Bottom]

Shame on them for appearing to submit to illegal demands from city governments.

If a city can't block a fast food restaurant then they can't block a strip club from setting up across from the elementary school.

Did the founder really change his position?

No.
They're just not funding the hate groups anymore, and would possibly be willing to hire one of them homos to work the fryer. Show the tolerance and all that. But sadly they still aren't changing their policies towards gays at the corporate level.

[Night Strike]

Shame on them for appearing to submit to illegal demands from city governments.

If a city can't block a fast food restaurant then they can't block a strip club from setting up across from the elementary school.

It is blatant discrimination to ban a business because you disagree with their political or religious beliefs.

Did the founder really change his position?

No.
They're just not funding the hate groups anymore, and would possibly be willing to hire one of them homos to work the fryer. Show the tolerance and all that. But sadly they still aren't changing their policies towards gays at the corporate level.

Opposing same-sex marriage does not mean a group is a hate-group.

[Juan_Bottom]

I agree. I also agree that it's blatant discrimination to deny homosexuals civil rights or jobs at your place of business.

But I still don't believe that porn shops should be allowed to set up next to the preschool.

[Night Strike]

I agree. I also agree that it's blatant discrimination to deny homosexuals civil rights or jobs at your place of business.

But I still don't believe that porn shops should be allowed to set up next to the preschool.

When has Chick-Fil-A ever denied a homosexual person a job or rights? If they had, you would have heard it all over the news.

[Juan_Bottom]

Heck if I know. I only know that this internal memo says that it's ok to hire them now in the chain.

[Night Strike]

Heck if I know. I only know that this internal memo says that it's ok to hire them now in the chain.

Actually, no, the memo talks about adding a specific clause to the non-discrimination policy regarding "sexual orientation". That doesn't meant the homosexuals were specifically denied employment prior.

[Juan_Bottom]

Same difference. Managers were allowed to discriminate against people turning in resumes based on sexual orientation. Now they're not supposed to, but this policy does not effect the corporate level. I suspect that you didn't follow the link because they mention something about gay employees talking about discrimination within the company. And if you thought that I thought that they didn't hire gays before, then you would have thought that you had me. I think. As a franchise restaurant, there are bound to be a few good people who bought in who wouldn't discriminate against people for senseless reasons.