Yeah, she was sitting on a blanket, Jimi walked past her, said "Hey, baby," and walked away.jnd94 wrote:ah shes SOOOOOOO lucky!vtmarik wrote:Somewhere, deep in the bowels of my family tree, I am related to Wyatt Earp.
Let's see, I have a great(x2, maybe x3) grandfather who was a Cherokee on the Trail of Tears.
My Uncle works at Kennedy Space Center.
My mom once met Jimi Hendrix at a concert.
That's all that springs to mind.
People you're related to who did notable things
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
- vtmarik
- Posts: 3863
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:51 am
- Location: Riding on the waves of fear and loathing.
- Contact:
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
- catseyeagate
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:04 pm
- Location: Muffinville, USA
- Contact:
-
spurgistan
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm
- flashleg8
- Posts: 1026
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:21 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: the Union of Soviet Socialist Scotland
Not aimed at anyone in particular but how can anyone possibly trace their roots reliably beyond the 18th century? I understand if you are from an aristocratic family more extensive that usual lineage records were kept, but for the common person family history becomes virtually impossible beyond the industrial revolution (in my experience).
Or do some people (pointing no fingers) think that just because they have the same name as someone they are related?
We have a million American tourists coming here (Scotland) saying – "I’m related to William Wallace", but if you question them a bit further you find out that their great granddad married a girl from Scotland called Wallace. Hardly conclusive proof! The tourist shops make a fortune here off these gullible fools.
Or do some people (pointing no fingers) think that just because they have the same name as someone they are related?
We have a million American tourists coming here (Scotland) saying – "I’m related to William Wallace", but if you question them a bit further you find out that their great granddad married a girl from Scotland called Wallace. Hardly conclusive proof! The tourist shops make a fortune here off these gullible fools.

Well, you may be right about Europe, but in East Asia (korea), every family basically keeps an extensive geneology that records every single generation, so it really depends where you are fromflashleg8 wrote:Not aimed at anyone in particular but how can anyone possibly trace their roots reliably beyond the 18th century? I understand if you are from an aristocratic family more extensive that usual lineage records were kept, but for the common person family history becomes virtually impossible beyond the industrial revolution (in my experience).
Or do some people (pointing no fingers) think that just because they have the same name as someone they are related?
We have a million American tourists coming here (Scotland) saying – "I’m related to William Wallace", but if you question them a bit further you find out that their great granddad married a girl from Scotland called Wallace. Hardly conclusive proof! The tourist shops make a fortune here off these gullible fools.
- flashleg8
- Posts: 1026
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:21 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: the Union of Soviet Socialist Scotland
Very true. You're right to pick me up on that fact. I was indeed talking about European and their colonial cousins. Mainly because most of the implausible claims were coming from those sources. I do apologise for being too Eurocentric.d.gishman wrote:Well, you may be right about Europe, but in East Asia (korea), every family basically keeps an extensive geneology that records every single generation, so it really depends where you are fromflashleg8 wrote:Not aimed at anyone in particular but how can anyone possibly trace their roots reliably beyond the 18th century? I understand if you are from an aristocratic family more extensive that usual lineage records were kept, but for the common person family history becomes virtually impossible beyond the industrial revolution (in my experience).
Or do some people (pointing no fingers) think that just because they have the same name as someone they are related?
We have a million American tourists coming here (Scotland) saying – "I’m related to William Wallace", but if you question them a bit further you find out that their great granddad married a girl from Scotland called Wallace. Hardly conclusive proof! The tourist shops make a fortune here off these gullible fools.
