- add a feature that allows you to foe others from only joining as your partner in games, but allows them to join as your opponent in games
- see above
- makes site more enjoyable
Moderator: Community Team
What would make the site more enjoyable would be if people like you didn't foe people for stupid reasonsGeneralRisk wrote: How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
- makes site more enjoyable
Invite feature is not available for fremium membersSimplyObsessed wrote:What would make the site more enjoyable would be if people like you didn't foe people for stupid reasonsGeneralRisk wrote: How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
- makes site more enjoyable
Easiest way to get around this is the invite feature.
Then theres another incentive to get them to payFalkomagno wrote:Invite feature is not available for fremium membersSimplyObsessed wrote:What would make the site more enjoyable would be if people like you didn't foe people for stupid reasonsGeneralRisk wrote: How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
- makes site more enjoyable
Easiest way to get around this is the invite feature.
Maybe you think I do it for stupid reasons. I think I do it for valid reasons. In your case I foed you for cheap tactics. After you joined one of my nuke games you would not end your turn as to not get a card. I foe any pussy ass motherfucker that does that in my games.(with the exception of fellow Clan members} Have a good day.SimplyObsessed wrote:What would make the site more enjoyable would be if people like you didn't foe people for stupid reasonsGeneralRisk wrote: How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
- makes site more enjoyable
Easiest way to get around this is the invite feature.
So very classy, then again.....GeneralRisk wrote:Maybe you think I do it for stupid reasons. I think I do it for valid reasons. In your case I foed you for cheap tactics. After you joined one of my nuke games you would not end your turn as to not get a card. I foe any pussy ass motherfucker that does that in my games.(with the exception of fellow Clan members} Have a good day.SimplyObsessed wrote:What would make the site more enjoyable would be if people like you didn't foe people for stupid reasonsGeneralRisk wrote: How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
- makes site more enjoyable
Easiest way to get around this is the invite feature.
Ty Mr. 3.2codeblue1018 wrote:So very classy, then again.....GeneralRisk wrote:Maybe you think I do it for stupid reasons. I think I do it for valid reasons. In your case I foed you for cheap tactics. After you joined one of my nuke games you would not end your turn as to not get a card. I foe any pussy ass motherfucker that does that in my games.(with the exception of fellow Clan members} Have a good day.SimplyObsessed wrote:What would make the site more enjoyable would be if people like you didn't foe people for stupid reasonsGeneralRisk wrote: How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
- makes site more enjoyable
Easiest way to get around this is the invite feature.
That happened only once, because postman came to my door with parcel like i said in game chat.GeneralRisk wrote:Maybe you think I do it for stupid reasons. I think I do it for valid reasons. In your case I foed you for cheap tactics. After you joined one of my nuke games you would not end your turn as to not get a card. I foe any pussy ass motherfucker that does that in my games.(with the exception of fellow Clan members} Have a good day.SimplyObsessed wrote:What would make the site more enjoyable would be if people like you didn't foe people for stupid reasonsGeneralRisk wrote: How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
- makes site more enjoyable
Easiest way to get around this is the invite feature.
I know it is a strategy that is not against the rules. In my opinion, if everyone didnt card then there is absolutely no reason to play nuke games. So go ahead and use that strategy in one of my games and you more than likely will be suicided upon and foed.DoomYoshi wrote:That is a valid nuclear strategy. If you want to foe people over it, that's your business. However, I do support this option. I think a series of checkboxes:
can join as teammate
can join as opponent
can join clan/tournament games
posts are invisible
walls/pms are blocked
That way you can pick and choose different foe conditions for everyone. While I do support this, I don't think it is high priority for CC. A temporary work-around would be to unfoe a player so they join as your opponent. The best solution is to not foe people for small reasons.


I never foed anyone for not attacking, except when they are on my dub team in a esc game and refuse to attack.betiko wrote:i m ok with people not attacking to avoid getting an extra card, but attacking and waiting for the timer to end is just anoying and cheap tactics, mostly if the turns are 5 minutes.
back to the topic; i think it's not a bad idea.
I really dont remember exactly what I foed you over. I do know it was not for cheap tactics. I think you are a nice person. I dont believe that we make a good dubs team on the classic map. If the new foe option was in place I would use it in your case. ..........(I hope that all the people I have foed do not reply in this thread because it will become a Zoo.)jgordon1111 wrote:Betiko do me a favor here tell GR what I say.
GR you have to set it for opponent in team games because if you let them join as your opponent,it would allow them in every other game you are in.
And I still apologise about that damn game,I asked the bug people about it no response as of yet.
Thanks GR appreciate it. I missed the critical first turn,and it cost us any chance of winning.GeneralRisk wrote:I really dont remember exactly what I foed you over. I do know it was not for cheap tactics. I think you are a nice person. I dont believe that we make a good dubs team on the classic map. If the new foe option was in place I would use it in your case. ..........(I hope that all the people I have foed do not reply in this thread because it will become a Zoo.)jgordon1111 wrote:Betiko do me a favor here tell GR what I say.
GR you have to set it for opponent in team games because if you let them join as your opponent,it would allow them in every other game you are in.
And I still apologise about that damn game,I asked the bug people about it no response as of yet.

If thats the only reason I foed you then I may have acted too harshly. I removed you from foe.jgordon1111 wrote:Thanks GR appreciate it. I missed the critical first turn,and it cost us any chance of winning.GeneralRisk wrote:I really dont remember exactly what I foed you over. I do know it was not for cheap tactics. I think you are a nice person. I dont believe that we make a good dubs team on the classic map. If the new foe option was in place I would use it in your case. ..........(I hope that all the people I have foed do not reply in this thread because it will become a Zoo.)jgordon1111 wrote:Betiko do me a favor here tell GR what I say.
GR you have to set it for opponent in team games because if you let them join as your opponent,it would allow them in every other game you are in.
And I still apologise about that damn game,I asked the bug people about it no response as of yet.
Seriously guys. Go make-up your foe business somewhere else. Stay on topic, peeps.rhp 1 wrote:what does this flaming and then kissing and making up have to do with the feature proposed....lol... i'm not a big fan of controlling who you play... I don't even like the foe feature all that much, but I understand it has it's place... so no, not a big fan of this idea....

Robinette wrote:Depends on what metric you use...Kaskavel wrote:Seriously. Who is the female conqueror of CC?
The coolest is squishyg
I'm going to presume that you mis-worded that...did you instead mean to prevent people whom you've foed from joining your games?squishyg wrote:The only addition we need to the foe feature is preventing people who've foed you from joining your games.
Oh Woody, yours is a dry wit with a subtle hint of elderberries.Woodruff wrote:I'm going to presume that you mis-worded that...did you instead mean to prevent people whom you've foed from joining your games?squishyg wrote:The only addition we need to the foe feature is preventing people who've foed you from joining your games.
If so...It's only been accepted as a suggestion for nearly five years...what's your hurry, squishyg?
And I'm sure you meant "correction" or "fix" rather than "addition".
(Otherwise...yeah, I pretty much agree with you...)

Robinette wrote:Depends on what metric you use...Kaskavel wrote:Seriously. Who is the female conqueror of CC?
The coolest is squishyg