Conquer Club

simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[noted/warned]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Postby tsioumiou on Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:42 am

Knight2254 wrote:Why don't we all just 'foe' them and then move on? The scoreboard is a joke so I'm not worried about that - but if they want to turn new players off from this site then that is there prerogative - however, you would think the admins would frown upon that.


Much better work here than the one i opened in General Discussion.

The problem is not us. The problem is the new players that are getting toasted
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant tsioumiou
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:15 pm

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Postby Jamie on Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:57 am

The solution is simple, get rid of freestyle games. The concept of a freestyle game is stupid, and shortsighted. They allow a person to have TWO turns before you even go, and that can be devastating. Also you might have a set worth 70 men, but need to go to bed or work, when all you need to do is wait for someone to begin turn for you to go. Due to real life things though you are forced to log off, and then someone begins turn uses their set and wipes you out. You shouldnt lose a game simply cause you had to go to work. Get rid of freestyle games. They only cater to point hogs, and cheaters. ALL games should be sequential. PERIOD.
Highest score to date: 2704 (June 25, 2008)
Highest on Scoreboard: 86 (June 25, 2008)
Highest Rank : Colonel (May 27, 2008)
Lowest Score to date : 776 (Nov 20, 2012)
Lowest Rank to date: Cook (Nov 20, 2012)
Shortest game won: 15 seconds - Game 12127866
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Jamie
 
Posts: 715
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:50 am
Location: Liberty, Missouri

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Postby jghost7 on Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:13 am

tsioumiou wrote:The problem is not us. The problem is the new players that are getting toasted


There will always be a new player being toasted, especially in Freestyle, but the point is that they are not being targeted.
Image
User avatar
Major jghost7
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 10:52 am

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Postby codeblue1018 on Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:31 am

:lol:

Very well documented Chuuuuck. An inflated rank for really a bunch of mediocre players is what it boils down to. It is quite apparent that attaining a rank that they would never attain playing like most legit players do is their goal. This is obvious as that continued doing this despite the original thread in GD. It is clear that they have no regard for the integrity of this site as they blatantly use these bullshit tactics. They my as well have the rank of cook as the star is meaningless. Zero respect for all involved as most would agree with.
Lieutenant codeblue1018
 
Posts: 1016
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 5:08 pm

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Postby Chuuuuck on Fri Mar 30, 2012 8:24 am

Click image to enlarge.
image


Anyone else notice that they dropped the game that was quoted and snapshotted in the OP. Pretty funny.

It was ready to be played, they had all of their low rankers joined and ripe for the kill, and instead of accepting the last invite AFTER 11 DAYS of waiting, they dropped the game completely.

Why the sudden conscious? Don't think this thread could have anything to do with it, do you?
Captain Chuuuuck
 
Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 11:09 am

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Postby betiko on Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:25 am

Chuuuuck wrote:
Click image to enlarge.
image


Anyone else notice that they dropped the game that was quoted and snapshotted in the OP. Pretty funny.

It was ready to be played, they had all of their low rankers joined and ripe for the kill, and instead of accepting the last invite AFTER 11 DAYS of waiting, they dropped the game completely.

Why the sudden conscious? Don't think this thread could have anything to do with it, do you?



to be perfectly honest, probably because you do somehow have a point chuuck. I played like 5 or 6 games of those, I know they were not fair for team 2. I've been in many cc game ambushes, and I just wanted to advance my medal i played a few of those out of many other game modes.
I think we all know it's not completely fair, and that it's a technique commonly used. Maybe a few pack guys played a bit too much of these in the past days.
But don't worry, they are all more than legit top tier brigs (even if codeblue might not agree, but I think that our clan wars result prove we are not that mediocre). maybe they did get a bit gready to reach their first star.
I just think we all got the point and won't do it again that's why all games have been dropped.
Apologies to the CC comunity that might have been bothered by this, won't happen again, but I do think this incident showed that a change must be made in team freestyle games and the way they are initialized because starting first is a great advantage.
And I one of the guys that really thinks freestyle should be treated as a different game with a different scoreboard.

cheers.
Image
User avatar
Major betiko
 
Posts: 10941
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Location: location, location
22

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Postby Chuuuuck on Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:28 am

betiko wrote:to be perfectly honest, probably because you do somehow have a point chuuck. I played like 5 or 6 games of those, I know they were not fair for team 2. I've been in many cc game ambushes, and I just wanted to advance my medal i played a few of those out of many other game modes.
I think we all know it's not completely fair, and that it's a technique commonly used. Maybe a few pack guys played a bit too much of these in the past days.
But don't worry, they are all more than legit top tier brigs (even if codeblue might not agree, but I think that our clan wars result prove we are not that mediocre). maybe they did get a bit gready to reach their first star.
I just think we all got the point and won't do it again that's why all games have been dropped.
Apologies to the CC comunity that might have been bothered by this, won't happen again, but I do think this incident showed that a change must be made in team freestyle games and the way they are initialized because starting first is a great advantage.
And I one of the guys that really thinks freestyle should be treated as a different game with a different scoreboard.

cheers.


A lot of the time I think posts from your clan are very immature and on the defensive without having a real look at the situation. Every once in a while you all surprise me.

This is one of the better and most realistic posts I have read. I appreciate the efforts made. And I do appreciate the acknowledgement that it is wrong and makes the site worse in general. Thanks betiko.
Captain Chuuuuck
 
Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 11:09 am

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Postby Great-Ollie on Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:54 am

Let's all get one thing straight here, this is a clear cut case of using the current system in place. A lot of people consider it abuse, which to a small degree i can see why, BUT with the current rules there is no premise on this being a major infraction case. If i was KA i would send out a warning to my clan mates to not abuse the current invite system anymore and let them make the right choice, but until they recieve some sort of warning, then why would they stop? I personally do not agree with inviting low ranks to FS games to ranch them. I do agree with Chuuuuuuck on a lot here, but until they face discipline, why jump all over them, they are all great players and guys. I think there needs to be a rule change here so this kind of thing gets abolished and we don't run into these problems.
Major Great-Ollie
 
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:53 pm
Location: Great white north.
2233

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Postby Chariot of Fire on Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:12 pm

Great last post by betiko. Kudos mate. =D>
Image
Highest position #5 (18 Nov 2010) General 4,380pts (11 Dec 2010)
User avatar
Colonel Chariot of Fire
 
Posts: 3659
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
Location: Buckinghamshire U.K.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Postby Leehar on Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:31 pm

I didn't know the person joining last could play first? Maybe just fixing that loophole could work?
show
User avatar
Colonel Leehar
 
Posts: 5490
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Location: Johannesburg

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Postby IcePack on Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:41 pm

Could still coordinate with their team, but how about team that joins last can't go first?
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
User avatar
Major IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16661
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Postby hmsps on Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:48 pm

Chariot of Fire wrote:Great last post by betiko. Kudos mate. =D>
+1 nice to see some honesty here.
Highest score 3372 02/08/12
Highest position 53 02/08/12
User avatar
Major hmsps
 
Posts: 769
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:23 pm

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Postby skillfull on Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:03 pm

Players who do that kind of tricks in order to get medals or for getting more and more points show a low character to me and I think to the whole CC community ( except in those who does the same, i guess).

Do you want to be respected by the best players on the site? Then you only have to face them on the battlefield and win them ,and not by getting a star by playing those kind of games.Simple as that.
Image
Brigadier skillfull
 
Posts: 772
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:39 am
Location: chalkis

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Postby codeblue1018 on Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:40 pm

betiko wrote:
Chuuuuck wrote:
Click image to enlarge.
image


Anyone else notice that they dropped the game that was quoted and snapshotted in the OP. Pretty funny.

It was ready to be played, they had all of their low rankers joined and ripe for the kill, and instead of accepting the last invite AFTER 11 DAYS of waiting, they dropped the game completely.

Why the sudden conscious? Don't think this thread could have anything to do with it, do you?



to be perfectly honest, probably because you do somehow have a point chuuck. I played like 5 or 6 games of those, I know they were not fair for team 2. I've been in many cc game ambushes, and I just wanted to advance my medal i played a few of those out of many other game modes.
I think we all know it's not completely fair, and that it's a technique commonly used. Maybe a few pack guys played a bit too much of these in the past days.
But don't worry, they are all more than legit top tier brigs (even if codeblue might not agree, but I think that our clan wars result prove we are not that mediocre). maybe they did get a bit gready to reach their first star.
I just think we all got the point and won't do it again that's why all games have been dropped.
Apologies to the CC comunity that might have been bothered by this, won't happen again, but I do think this incident showed that a change must be made in team freestyle games and the way they are initialized because starting first is a great advantage.
And I one of the guys that really thinks freestyle should be treated as a different game with a different scoreboard.

cheers.


Stand up post!
Lieutenant codeblue1018
 
Posts: 1016
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 5:08 pm

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Postby DrewbieDoo on Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:09 pm

Not gonna lie. It's pure strategy at the heart of this matter. The court should be guided by the history and public policy of the invitation method. I liken this situation to a childish game of musical chairs. Where the ultimate goal is to be at minimum second-to-last. Timing is of the essence in such sport. A competitor's use of his innate skill to eliminate worthier competitors early on where the shuffle for a remaining seat is chaotic, proves to be the fruit of his labor later in the game when only a few chairs remain and only unworthy opponents left.

I respectfully request that this court heed this rule and decide in favor of the accused.

For Frodo.
Corporal DrewbieDoo
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 8:27 am

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Postby Evolution299 on Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:17 pm

Jamie wrote:The solution is simple, get rid of freestyle games. The concept of a freestyle game is stupid, and shortsighted. They allow a person to have TWO turns before you even go, and that can be devastating. Also you might have a set worth 70 men, but need to go to bed or work, when all you need to do is wait for someone to begin turn for you to go. Due to real life things though you are forced to log off, and then someone begins turn uses their set and wipes you out. You shouldnt lose a game simply cause you had to go to work. Get rid of freestyle games. They only cater to point hogs, and cheaters. ALL games should be sequential. PERIOD.


I like this suggestion. It seems like a large portion of the harvesting/ranching/farming problems involve freestyle play. Just get rid of it.
I large part of the problem is then solved.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Evolution299
 
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:22 pm

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Postby TheGeneral2112 on Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:51 pm

If this is found guilty then they will join all games together as team 2 and take the first turn just the same.
User avatar
Lieutenant TheGeneral2112
 
Posts: 371
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:50 pm

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Postby codeblue1018 on Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:09 pm

Evolution299 wrote:
Jamie wrote:The solution is simple, get rid of freestyle games. The concept of a freestyle game is stupid, and shortsighted. They allow a person to have TWO turns before you even go, and that can be devastating. Also you might have a set worth 70 men, but need to go to bed or work, when all you need to do is wait for someone to begin turn for you to go. Due to real life things though you are forced to log off, and then someone begins turn uses their set and wipes you out. You shouldnt lose a game simply cause you had to go to work. Get rid of freestyle games. They only cater to point hogs, and cheaters. ALL games should be sequential. PERIOD.


I like this suggestion. It seems like a large portion of the harvesting/ranching/farming problems involve freestyle play. Just get rid of it.
I large part of the problem is then solved.


The concept of freestyle isn't the problem and is a vital component of this site. The problem is with players manipulating the game style. A little tweaking and a couple new rules and wahlah, problem solved.
Lieutenant codeblue1018
 
Posts: 1016
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 5:08 pm

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Postby tsioumiou on Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:26 pm

Evolution299 wrote:
Jamie wrote:The solution is simple, get rid of freestyle games. The concept of a freestyle game is stupid, and shortsighted. They allow a person to have TWO turns before you even go, and that can be devastating. Also you might have a set worth 70 men, but need to go to bed or work, when all you need to do is wait for someone to begin turn for you to go. Due to real life things though you are forced to log off, and then someone begins turn uses their set and wipes you out. You shouldnt lose a game simply cause you had to go to work. Get rid of freestyle games. They only cater to point hogs, and cheaters. ALL games should be sequential. PERIOD.


I like this suggestion. It seems like a large portion of the harvesting/ranching/farming problems involve freestyle play. Just get rid of it.
I large part of the problem is then solved.



Yes. I have a better idea. lets shut the whole cc down. And lets sue the mods as well. What do you think
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant tsioumiou
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:15 pm

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Postby Chariot of Fire on Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:50 pm

tsioumiou wrote:
Evolution299 wrote:
Jamie wrote:The solution is simple, get rid of freestyle games. The concept of a freestyle game is stupid, and shortsighted. They allow a person to have TWO turns before you even go, and that can be devastating. Also you might have a set worth 70 men, but need to go to bed or work, when all you need to do is wait for someone to begin turn for you to go. Due to real life things though you are forced to log off, and then someone begins turn uses their set and wipes you out. You shouldnt lose a game simply cause you had to go to work. Get rid of freestyle games. They only cater to point hogs, and cheaters. ALL games should be sequential. PERIOD.


I like this suggestion. It seems like a large portion of the harvesting/ranching/farming problems involve freestyle play. Just get rid of it.
I large part of the problem is then solved.



Yes. I have a better idea. lets shut the whole cc down. And lets sue the mods as well. What do you think


I think you help destroy your case by making glib remarks, that's what I think.
Image
Highest position #5 (18 Nov 2010) General 4,380pts (11 Dec 2010)
User avatar
Colonel Chariot of Fire
 
Posts: 3659
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
Location: Buckinghamshire U.K.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Postby tsioumiou on Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:45 pm

Chariot of Fire wrote:
tsioumiou wrote:
Evolution299 wrote:
Jamie wrote:The solution is simple, get rid of freestyle games. The concept of a freestyle game is stupid, and shortsighted. They allow a person to have TWO turns before you even go, and that can be devastating. Also you might have a set worth 70 men, but need to go to bed or work, when all you need to do is wait for someone to begin turn for you to go. Due to real life things though you are forced to log off, and then someone begins turn uses their set and wipes you out. You shouldnt lose a game simply cause you had to go to work. Get rid of freestyle games. They only cater to point hogs, and cheaters. ALL games should be sequential. PERIOD.


I like this suggestion. It seems like a large portion of the harvesting/ranching/farming problems involve freestyle play. Just get rid of it.
I large part of the problem is then solved.



Yes. I have a better idea. lets shut the whole cc down. And lets sue the mods as well. What do you think


I think you help destroy your case by making glib remarks, that's what I think.


And you are just trolling. Do you have anything to say? Dont you think the comment that he made deserves this kind of answer?

I ve said it before. Competitive speed freestyle(not farming) is one of the best things this site has to offer. The invite button abuse requires freestyle but blaming the freestyle is just silly. It is way too general. we are talking about 0.0001% of freestyle games. I find it really hard to understand how some people can be so naive to blame freestyle.

There you go
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant tsioumiou
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:15 pm

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Postby army of nobunaga on Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:00 pm

I was in tecs clan.. he is by far the biggest cheater Ive met.. Im not going to add examples... Ill not sully my name more.

But Yeah... I know his underlings well... I know what they say and told me in the past.
Maps Maps Maps!


Take part in this survey and possibly win an upgrade -->
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/embeddedform?formkey=dGg4a0VxUzJLb1NGNUFwZHBuOHRFZnc6MQ
User avatar
Cadet army of nobunaga
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:06 pm
Location: www.facebook.com/armyofnobu and Houston.

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Postby jltile1 on Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:35 pm

Why not just make freestyle rank separate ? It is a totally diffrent game than any other two rank would be nice and seems all the complaints could vanish. Just a thought maybe we wouldn't see all these complaints.
User avatar
Major jltile1
 
Posts: 867
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:12 pm
Location: Bay area

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69[pending]es

Postby tec805 on Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:51 pm

army of nobunaga wrote:I was in tecs clan.. he is by far the biggest cheater Ive met.. Im not going to add examples... Ill not sully my name more.

But Yeah... I know his underlings well... I know what they say and told me in the past.


2011-04-20 16:31:58 - tec805 [team]: Army, you could have hit L3 like I suggested and dropped pink to 11. You left a 5 stack next to Paulus, cyan has an 11 stack he could bring north and fort to Paulus
2011-04-20 16:40:08 - tec805 [team]: you have multiple possible forts and you skipped doing any. We really need to work on every small advantage we can get if we want to win by more that lucky dice
2011-04-29 16:48:42 - tec805 [team]: unless army fucks this up
2011-05-01 05:22:13 - tec805 [team]: dude, when you are fucking up just be a big boy and admit it, then try and play nice with others


That was from our last game together AoN. I take my Stalingrad war games very seriously and you were almost worthless as a partner. You stomped your feet, quit the clan and CC. Your personal vendetta over our long ago issues might have tainted your oh-so-eloquent prose. We were playing cheaply, but at least we played well.
Image
show: spoiler sigs are like my dice, they suck
User avatar
General tec805
 
Posts: 525
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:55 am
Location: ☀ Southern California, where the sunshine's shining ☀

Re: simmons4/tec805/davsweeney/smegal69

Postby Chariot of Fire on Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:45 pm

tsioumiou wrote:
Chariot of Fire wrote:
tsioumiou wrote:
Evolution299 wrote:
Jamie wrote:The solution is simple, get rid of freestyle games. The concept of a freestyle game is stupid, and shortsighted. They allow a person to have TWO turns before you even go, and that can be devastating. Also you might have a set worth 70 men, but need to go to bed or work, when all you need to do is wait for someone to begin turn for you to go. Due to real life things though you are forced to log off, and then someone begins turn uses their set and wipes you out. You shouldnt lose a game simply cause you had to go to work. Get rid of freestyle games. They only cater to point hogs, and cheaters. ALL games should be sequential. PERIOD.


I like this suggestion. It seems like a large portion of the harvesting/ranching/farming problems involve freestyle play. Just get rid of it.
I large part of the problem is then solved.



Yes. I have a better idea. lets shut the whole cc down. And lets sue the mods as well. What do you think


I think you help destroy your case by making glib remarks, that's what I think.


And you are just trolling. Do you have anything to say? Dont you think the comment that he made deserves this kind of answer?

I ve said it before. Competitive speed freestyle(not farming) is one of the best things this site has to offer. The invite button abuse requires freestyle but blaming the freestyle is just silly. It is way too general. we are talking about 0.0001% of freestyle games. I find it really hard to understand how some people can be so naive to blame freestyle.

There you go


And there you go mate - that wasn't so hard was it? This C&A report was brought about as a result of your initial post (in GD) in which you appeared to have given up the cause

Well i don't want to drag this any further. I did expect a bit more support maybe.


My fellow clan mates and I also don't condone or practice cheap tactics, so it was felt a C&A report was merited based on the evidence you had already unearthed. No-one is going to pay any attention to Jamie's post when he says "Get rid of freestyle altogether" for that's not ever going to happen. Your reply......

Yes. I have a better idea. lets shut the whole cc down. And lets sue the mods as well. What do you think


.....doesn't exactly help the cause, rather it perpetuates the deviation from topic which could result in the thread being locked.

So no, I wasn't trolling. Just staying focused. Cheers
Image
Highest position #5 (18 Nov 2010) General 4,380pts (11 Dec 2010)
User avatar
Colonel Chariot of Fire
 
Posts: 3659
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
Location: Buckinghamshire U.K.

PreviousNext

Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users