Moderator: Community Team
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
me neitherstrike wolf wrote:Since I just got done with Hectic *waves to Tails...and chap* I'll join this though I'm not up to date on current pokemon.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
nvm zimmah tricked me..Eldario wrote:are we not 16 players signed up?
i know all pokemon more or less except the black and white versions, never played that versions.shieldgenerator7 wrote:me neitherstrike wolf wrote:Since I just got done with Hectic *waves to Tails...and chap* I'll join this though I'm not up to date on current pokemon.actually just started playing FireRed
woah bro your late i played that in middle school lololshieldgenerator7 wrote:me neitherstrike wolf wrote:Since I just got done with Hectic *waves to Tails...and chap* I'll join this though I'm not up to date on current pokemon.actually just started playing FireRed
haha ya the first 151 have good names the rest are bs names like turtwig...whoever came up with that needs to be punched in the neckpmchugh wrote:Note to mod: there are only 151 pokemon the rest are all lies.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
even tho i don't hate scizor i think scyter is much cooler.strike wolf wrote:I'm ok as long as we don't have the evolved form of scyther. That bleeping scissor pokemon pissed me off.
your thinking of growlithe of course !!zimmah wrote:even tho i don't hate scizor i think scyter is much cooler.strike wolf wrote:I'm ok as long as we don't have the evolved form of scyther. That bleeping scissor pokemon pissed me off.
in fact, most of the original 151 pokemon are the best/coolest. not to say the later series are bad though.
arcanine is still my #1 pokemon of all time for the cute factor. As for the strongest (non-legendary) one, it's hard to choose and highly situational, there's not 1 pokemon that beats literaly every other pokemon in every situation, i beleive there may not be even 1 team of pokemon that would win every battle, as every team would have it's own weaknesses and strenghts. ofc. some teams are way better then others in most situations but still.
arcanine is cuter then growlithe, but growlithe is still a cute puppy. (and they often come with a nice female cop too)Some7hingCLEVER wrote:your thinking of growlithe of course !!zimmah wrote:even tho i don't hate scizor i think scyter is much cooler.strike wolf wrote:I'm ok as long as we don't have the evolved form of scyther. That bleeping scissor pokemon pissed me off.
in fact, most of the original 151 pokemon are the best/coolest. not to say the later series are bad though.
arcanine is still my #1 pokemon of all time for the cute factor. As for the strongest (non-legendary) one, it's hard to choose and highly situational, there's not 1 pokemon that beats literaly every other pokemon in every situation, i beleive there may not be even 1 team of pokemon that would win every battle, as every team would have it's own weaknesses and strenghts. ofc. some teams are way better then others in most situations but still.
pokemon is great by the mechanics of it, and somewhat the social aspect of training and leveling them, kinda like an MMO, that being said, 'd love a WOW-like MMO made out of pokemon, but this will probably neever happen because nintendo won't do it themselves and nor will any company likely ever buy pokemon (nintendo wouldn't sell one of their most profitable series, t would be almost as bad as selling the mario franchise).DoomYoshi wrote:I think the problem with saying the new pokemon are poorer is the problem of nostalgia.
If the newer pokemon were all that there was, would pokemon be worse? I don't think so, but I may be wrong.
The series doesn't have to be sold in order for other companies to have games made.zimmah wrote:pokemon is great by the mechanics of it, and somewhat the social aspect of training and leveling them, kinda like an MMO, that being said, 'd love a WOW-like MMO made out of pokemon, but this will probably neever happen because nintendo won't do it themselves and nor will any company likely ever buy pokemon (nintendo wouldn't sell one of their most profitable series, t would be almost as bad as selling the mario franchise).DoomYoshi wrote:I think the problem with saying the new pokemon are poorer is the problem of nostalgia.
If the newer pokemon were all that there was, would pokemon be worse? I don't think so, but I may be wrong.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
nintendo still has to give permissionDoomYoshi wrote:The series doesn't have to be sold in order for other companies to have games made.zimmah wrote:pokemon is great by the mechanics of it, and somewhat the social aspect of training and leveling them, kinda like an MMO, that being said, 'd love a WOW-like MMO made out of pokemon, but this will probably neever happen because nintendo won't do it themselves and nor will any company likely ever buy pokemon (nintendo wouldn't sell one of their most profitable series, t would be almost as bad as selling the mario franchise).DoomYoshi wrote:I think the problem with saying the new pokemon are poorer is the problem of nostalgia.
If the newer pokemon were all that there was, would pokemon be worse? I don't think so, but I may be wrong.
Most Pokemon games aren't made by Nintendo. Ditto for Mario. They usually do go out-of-house for the super successful franchises.
Game Freak is still a Nintendo property.DoomYoshi wrote:The series doesn't have to be sold in order for other companies to have games made.zimmah wrote:pokemon is great by the mechanics of it, and somewhat the social aspect of training and leveling them, kinda like an MMO, that being said, 'd love a WOW-like MMO made out of pokemon, but this will probably neever happen because nintendo won't do it themselves and nor will any company likely ever buy pokemon (nintendo wouldn't sell one of their most profitable series, t would be almost as bad as selling the mario franchise).DoomYoshi wrote:I think the problem with saying the new pokemon are poorer is the problem of nostalgia.
If the newer pokemon were all that there was, would pokemon be worse? I don't think so, but I may be wrong.
Most Pokemon games aren't made by Nintendo. Ditto for Mario. They usually do go out-of-house for the super successful franchises.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
3DS and Wii U are better ideas than the Wii itself imo, and look at how popular the Wii was. Besides Nintendo has a virtual monopoly on handheld games.pancakemix wrote:Game Freak is still a Nintendo property.DoomYoshi wrote:The series doesn't have to be sold in order for other companies to have games made.zimmah wrote:pokemon is great by the mechanics of it, and somewhat the social aspect of training and leveling them, kinda like an MMO, that being said, 'd love a WOW-like MMO made out of pokemon, but this will probably neever happen because nintendo won't do it themselves and nor will any company likely ever buy pokemon (nintendo wouldn't sell one of their most profitable series, t would be almost as bad as selling the mario franchise).DoomYoshi wrote:I think the problem with saying the new pokemon are poorer is the problem of nostalgia.
If the newer pokemon were all that there was, would pokemon be worse? I don't think so, but I may be wrong.
Most Pokemon games aren't made by Nintendo. Ditto for Mario. They usually do go out-of-house for the super successful franchises.
Nintendo still won't do something like that. They're being creative in all the wrong ways (3DS, Wii U) and not changing things in any of the right ways. Hoppefully they get the dumb slapped out of them and actually fix this problem before it's too late.
IT is.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:woah bro your late i played that in middle school lololshieldgenerator7 wrote:me neitherstrike wolf wrote:Since I just got done with Hectic *waves to Tails...and chap* I'll join this though I'm not up to date on current pokemon.actually just started playing FireRed
i think the most recent is black and white
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
3D is a gimmick (and an awful one at that). So was motion control. Kinect and Move aren't doing well because the wow factor is gone. Wii U looks awful to hold and still isn't a media device.These are not good things.3DS and Wii U are better ideas than the Wii itself imo, and look at how popular the Wii was. Besides Nintendo has a virtual monopoly on handheld games
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
they did great on skyward sword though, totaly loved the direction they went with that, but the Wii just didn't bring a lot of great games and even though the Wii-mote was quite good for some games (especially wii motion plus, which is way underused) i expected more from the wii in terms of refreshing games.pancakemix wrote:3D is a gimmick (and an awful one at that). So was motion control. Kinect and Move aren't doing well because the wow factor is gone. Wii U looks awful to hold and still isn't a media device.These are not good things.3DS and Wii U are better ideas than the Wii itself imo, and look at how popular the Wii was. Besides Nintendo has a virtual monopoly on handheld games
That, and they posted record losses this past year. Never a good sign.
*shrugs* Maybe it's just me but I focused on the things like more Pokemon games. x3pancakemix wrote:3D is a gimmick (and an awful one at that). So was motion control. Kinect and Move aren't doing well because the wow factor is gone. Wii U looks awful to hold and still isn't a media device.These are not good things.3DS and Wii U are better ideas than the Wii itself imo, and look at how popular the Wii was. Besides Nintendo has a virtual monopoly on handheld games
That, and they posted record losses this past year. Never a good sign.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.