natty dread wrote:This whole farming witch hunt has gone too far, IMO. Rulings are inconsistent and no one knows for sure if they're breaking a rule or not. Everyone seems to have their own opinion about who is breaking the rules, and what the rules should or should not say...
I agree, it's inconsistent and sometimes ridiculous. Think it would make sense to frame the rule clearer since it's impossible to predict the outcome, and much of it seems to depend on how much people are whining in the forum.
king achilles wrote:I can still see mixed opponents from NR's to veteran players coming from these 1vs1 Poison Rome games he creates. He does not drop the games when a veteran player joins. If you see him inviting new recruits, please do provide them. He is also mixing his games with different maps. There are not enough new recruits in his collection of opponents since he is making 2 player games. It is going to take a lot of more games for him to collect many NR opponents in this style. Is Poison Rome even a complicated map? I also take into consideration if the map and settings are quite complicated for a new recruit to understand. If they are simple enough, then the new recruit has a fair chance to play and win.
I don't understand how someone could drop a 1v1 player game when a veteran player joins. Frankly, I think if CC is concerned about NRs joining 1v1 Poisone Rome games, it should just remove the map from then (as has been done with other maps) and not ask paying members to be careful setting up these games. EDIT: But this has been considered farming in the past, so not surprised of the outcome.
king achilles wrote:This. I can't help but suspect that you are looking for something in order for you to continuously play new recruits in particular. Again, this constant reports of trying to find ways to play NR has got to stop.
You have no sense of humour. Apologies for being sarcastic when writing these two threads. But it shouldn't matter. The rules are the rules no matter what I think or how I frame it, you have the facts. These two reports are serious. What I can tell, both these matters could very well be considered "NR farming" judging from what you have said in the past. This one, where a player continuously sets up games with a 70% chance of getting a NR, and the other one where a player obviously goes after a high share of NRs (30-40%) when playing 1v1 games (adding up to 8% of total game count). It seems to me that it both could very well be considered to be "systematic" due to what you have said in the past. But I'm glad that you clarified the rule a little bit.