Conquer Club

[CL4] Phase 1 - Div G - Final

Finished challenges between two competitive clans.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby firstholliday on Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:41 am

Image
7 firstholliday 3589 (58%) General 128-2 Netherlands
User avatar
General firstholliday
 
Posts: 1338
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:51 pm
Location: Amsterdam (the fun city)

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby Qwert on Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:54 pm

MYT-G1 2-2

well i think that MYT take win against AKA- final score could be 8-4 or 9-3 for MYT. =D>
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby gradybridges on Mon Jan 30, 2012 10:40 am

Week 3 away line up for WAR vs MYTH sent to benga but just gonna pm/post so if it changes again I'm covered
Route 66
Mass Miracle stevenshome

British Isles
vaz2103 bigg chief

Imp Romanium
hmsps severs stevenshome

CairnCoralCoast
hmsps sdh stevenshome

Quads 2.1
DavDanilo TheRookThief sekretar vaz2103

Pearl Harbor
vaz2103 bigg chief severs Shaun850
User avatar
Lieutenant gradybridges
 
Posts: 840
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 1:02 pm

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby gradybridges on Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:55 pm

Had to sub out atax in 3 games due to unforseen illness. hope that is ok.
User avatar
Lieutenant gradybridges
 
Posts: 840
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 1:02 pm

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby benga on Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:46 pm

All home games made!
User avatar
Sergeant benga
 
Posts: 6925
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:15 pm

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby woopintroysbutt on Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:05 pm

Here are Myth's players for WAR's home games for Round 3:

1D-Peloponnesian war--Sirmium Samurai--Phulish
2D-AOR2---ESQuire--bazza
1T-Lunar War---jasholz--theguard--acrazyfella
2T-Feudal War---woopintroysbutt--petey--Landain
1Q-South Africa---qwert--D00MandD3A7H--kjg21-IanG7
2Q-Africa---anonadick--karel--peanutsdad--alcazar
Image
User avatar
Captain woopintroysbutt
 
Posts: 945
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:36 pm
Location: Florida

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby laughingcavalier on Fri Feb 03, 2012 7:51 pm

Tough match against WAR. We are 3-0 up but WAR have a lot of leads - too soon to call the winner. Looks like some good games.
Image
Major laughingcavalier
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:31 pm

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby eddie2 on Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:23 am

aka take the first easy style.
Game 10530178
i think clapper needs to give her monkeys a good spank
User avatar
Lieutenant eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby Qwert on Sun Feb 05, 2012 9:17 am

final score for Myt-Aka round will be 8-4 for MYT.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby woopintroysbutt on Sun Feb 05, 2012 2:24 pm

Below are Myth's Home Games and Setting for Round 4 against TSM.

1D--Arms Race--jgalioto--bigragooch--------------------------------------------flat-chain-fog
2D--All your base belong---kjg21--IanG7-----------------------------------------esc-chain-fog
1T--Das Schloss---Zidane-21--Sirmium Samurai--fumandomuerte------------no spoils, unlimited, and foggy.
2T--Treausers of Galapagos---petey--Landain--orangenitrox-----------------esc-chain-fog
1Q--Kings Court---petey--Landain--bazza--fumandomuerte------------------esc-chain-fog
2Q---Stalingrad---Phulish--kjg21--IanG7--anonadick----------------------------chained, no spoils, foggy
Image
User avatar
Captain woopintroysbutt
 
Posts: 945
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:36 pm
Location: Florida

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby laughingcavalier on Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:16 pm

TSM vrs MYTH
firstholliday-frop Middle East ns ch sunny
Kratos644-luckywar AOR2 ns ch foggy
laddida, Blind Date, Skillfull - Alex empire, ns,chained,sunny
Luckywar ā€“ laughingcavalier ā€“ ender_w99 - Kings Court ns ch foggy
kratos644, laddida, Tisha, Clapper011 - WWII Europe, ns, ch, sunny
Jalen45, kmacready, Georgerx7di Skillfull - Supermax, ns, ch, foggy
Image
Major laughingcavalier
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:31 pm

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby Qwert on Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:56 pm

TSM-AKA--0-3
these is suprisse start(shocked)
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby eddie2 on Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:46 pm

qwert wrote:TSM-AKA--0-3
these is suprisse start(shocked)


qwert it is only 0-1 plz post correct info dont guess what the results will be.
User avatar
Lieutenant eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby Qwert on Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:03 pm

eddie2 wrote:
qwert wrote:TSM-AKA--0-3
these is suprisse start(shocked)


qwert it is only 0-1 plz post correct info dont guess what the results will be.

cam on eddie, do i predict correct previous results, give me some support.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby eddie2 on Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:45 am

qwert wrote:
eddie2 wrote:
qwert wrote:TSM-AKA--0-3
these is suprisse start(shocked)


qwert it is only 0-1 plz post correct info dont guess what the results will be.

cam on eddie, do i predict correct previous results, give me some support.


rofl in the other games we were against you in these ones you cannot see what is happening. one of the games you have said is border line we might of killed a player but they are still stacked.(something you would not be able to see because game is fog.)
User avatar
Lieutenant eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby sdh on Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:26 am

looking like WAR will draw 6-6 with G1 and lose 7-5 to TSM. Still early in the games with Myth, but looks like they have the edge.
Lieutenant sdh
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 7:43 am
234

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby Qwert on Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:45 am

eddie are these not aloved to predict results?
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby Leehar on Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:23 pm

qwert, ignore eddie and you'll be better for it ;)
show
User avatar
Colonel Leehar
 
Posts: 5488
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Location: Johannesburg

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby laughingcavalier on Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:06 pm

Everyone keen to beat us I see. :twisted:

TSM vrs WAR - we win, currently score is 7-3. GG chaps, charming & testing opponents.

TSM vrs AKA current score 1-1.
Image
Major laughingcavalier
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:31 pm

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby karel on Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:18 pm

Leehar wrote:qwert, ignore eddie and you'll be better for it ;)



agree
Corporal 1st Class karel
 
Posts: 1186
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 3:01 pm
Location: montana........rolling in the mud with the hippies

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby Qwert on Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:32 pm

well i look on all games,and AKA had nice start- and if these stay like now-Aka can win against TSM with score 7-5,or 8-4.
These could be first suprisse result in G group.
G1 vs Myt- could be 7-5 or 6-6
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby eddie2 on Tue Feb 07, 2012 7:27 pm

Leehar wrote:qwert, ignore eddie and you'll be better for it ;)


leehar all i am saying he is putting inaccurate scores down if the scores were true then no problem but they were not.
User avatar
Lieutenant eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby Qwert on Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:47 pm

eddie2 wrote:
Leehar wrote:qwert, ignore eddie and you'll be better for it ;)


leehar all i am saying he is putting inaccurate scores down if the scores were true then no problem but they were not.


lol eddie,these its not innacurate scores,these its call predictions.
I give you example-MAnchester United play against Chelsea- you say " MU will win 1-0", now these is call prediction, these not mean that you will be right or wrong. And these is not against any rules, in some countries you can bet on money,to predict results.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby Kinnison on Tue Feb 07, 2012 11:48 pm

First:
Apologies from G1. I was on vacation, I didn't tell benga - because I had a secondary contact, but I and my second dropped the ball, and we didn't get our R4 games submitted in a timely manner. We'll play the random settings and invites sent, as per the rules. We ask that any needed invites be re-sent, due to confusion on our end with what was going on. Not everyone in G1 (even those on the list of 10) was aware of the penalty clause. I clearly wasn't around to be accepting invites, and I'm on that list of 10.

Second:
Personal apologies - same issue: *I* didn't get things straight with my second. *I* didn't tell benga or our W4 foes that there might be a hitch or delay. As a result, they contacted who they knew - not our secondary contact, and that caused FURTHER problems on our end.

Third:
I'm back. We'll be fine for away teams (almost assembled now) for W4, and W5 will be fine as well.
Image
Currently Running Tourneys: -none-
Tourney Winner: "You're Eliminated" III; Keep It Simple Quads - Team Generation One
User avatar
Lieutenant Kinnison
 
Posts: 1187
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Generation One Autobot HQ (or, Texas)

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G

Postby eddie2 on Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:32 am

Kinnison wrote:First:
Apologies from G1. I was on vacation, I didn't tell benga - because I had a secondary contact, but I and my second dropped the ball, and we didn't get our R4 games submitted in a timely manner. We'll play the random settings and invites sent, as per the rules. We ask that any needed invites be re-sent, due to confusion on our end with what was going on. Not everyone in G1 (even those on the list of 10) was aware of the penalty clause. I clearly wasn't around to be accepting invites, and I'm on that list of 10.

Second:
Personal apologies - same issue: *I* didn't get things straight with my second. *I* didn't tell benga or our W4 foes that there might be a hitch or delay. As a result, they contacted who they knew - not our secondary contact, and that caused FURTHER problems on our end.

Third:
I'm back. We'll be fine for away teams (almost assembled now) for W4, and W5 will be fine as well.


it is a real pity they picked this one rule to actually stick 2.. i did say it was ok for you to use your set. after a discussion with a g1 member.

and ps qwert when you post this.
qwert wrote:TSM-AKA--0-3
these is suprisse start(shocked)

that is not a prediction that is you saying we have won 3 games when we had only won 1 game. and still have.
User avatar
Lieutenant eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

PreviousNext

Return to Complete Challenges

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users