Moderator: Community Team
Djfireside wrote:You reach a lynch by just pressuring people and causing havoc and trying to make sense of it later. Its like organized confusion and most of the time I have seen it where it got so twisted, it just became a no lynch. A lynch normally gives more details but No lynch gives night actions... each has its own benefit and downfall.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:Djfireside wrote:You reach a lynch by just pressuring people and causing havoc and trying to make sense of it later. Its like organized confusion and most of the time I have seen it where it got so twisted, it just became a no lynch. A lynch normally gives more details but No lynch gives night actions... each has its own benefit and downfall.
Spot on. The only rule of the D1 is show no weakness. You will be slain for it.
codierose wrote:unvote vote Iron Butterfly for FOS on himself
codierose wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:catnipdreams wrote:Ragian wrote:On the other hand, it also "typical" mafia tactics (in my experience) to redirect the town. Mafia won't make the cases themselves, but throw out possibilities for others to catch in order to have their hands clean.
Er, that's unfortunate - it is in my nature to be very detail oriented, and ask lots of questions - not to redirect town away from scum, but to obtain the best results by engaging everyone in uncovering the truth... I take a very slow and deliberate approach to this, and although this is only my second Mafia game, I think my style settled in pretty quickly in my first Mafia game. So please keep this in mind as we go along - I will not compromise thoroughness in order to appear "more town", especially if hasty action leads to a quick lynch of a town player.
But the flip side of this is, I assume that you all are intelligent, thoughtful players... If anyone throws out something that is catchable, there is a reason it is catchable. We all read the same posts; I think we should consider all possibilities, and then select the best one. We can look back after a bit and see if there is a pattern that looks scummy, of course, but why limit the ideas from the start of the game?
Best intentions mean nothing a lot of times. What you think is catchable others may write off as nothing, while the opposite is also true. The simple fact is you may know your Town but no one else does. You may think you have the answer but if you cant get players to listen/beleive.
You will find out very quickly that if you are Town Mafia will know your Town and do their best to make you look bad with out drawing suspicion to themselves.
Your post comes across like you want everyone to beleive you are Town, which may be true but a person could also draw opposite conclusions.
How do you uncover the truth without knowing who is telling the truth?
thanks for this butterfly im finding this happening to me in other games could not understand why. i keep getting jumped on when i ask questions, agree with others even vote lol
unvote butterfly
now WWilliam i agree with what your saying here think im in the same games but cant say its the norm its the only games ive been in lolwildwilliam wrote:In the (I believe) 3 games I have played. I have seen this happen a couple of times. 2 i think happened recently and in the same game. Eagleblade and ghostly both made comments regarding willing to follow someone else' direction. Both flipped scum.
Not only that but once I voted Eagle, he put an OMGUS vote on me, just like what is happening now.
So my vote will stay.
also there is no need for this1) why are you being an ass?
2) why are you being so protective of pershy
soundman wrote:Um... Mob, he unvoted IB... I know, I was confused at first too. Thought it was a vote because he added the name.
codierose wrote:soundman wrote:Um... Mob, he unvoted IB... I know, I was confused at first too. Thought it was a vote because he added the name.
yep high lighted butterfly by mistake should have just the unvote for the joke vote
Nebuchadnezer wrote:1. I don't care for that language.
Nebuchadnezer wrote:2. Mafia tend to have angry irrational responses when pushed. Iron Butterfly wasn't even really pushing you, just getting a jab in, and this is your response? You're either mafia, or need thicker skin.
Iron Butterfly wrote:[
When you say "[tend]" I am assuming you have specific examples to back this claim up?
Iron Butterfly wrote:
1) I am asking legitimate questions. You have a strong tendency to avoid legit questions, which does not mean you are scum BUT You made a judgment on someone as being scummy. I simply asked you to back up up your accusation.
Iron Butterfly wrote:2) I am not protecting pershy. I am pointing out how you made a sweeping generalization.
Iron Butterfly wrote:3) No need for the language. Im getting tire of folks who when they cant defend their argument feel its ok to insult. Lets keep it civil please.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
wildwilliam wrote:Nebuchadnezer wrote:1. I don't care for that language.
That is a smart reason to vote for someone. Sorry you don't like the word ass.Nebuchadnezer wrote:2. Mafia tend to have angry irrational responses when pushed. Iron Butterfly wasn't even really pushing you, just getting a jab in, and this is your response? You're either mafia, or need thicker skin.
Taking a line from Iron Buttryfly:Iron Butterfly wrote:[
When you say "[tend]" I am assuming you have specific examples to back this claim up?
Also I don't like jabs, and if you are offended by the word ass, then YOU need thicker skin. ass.Iron Butterfly wrote:
1) I am asking legitimate questions. You have a strong tendency to avoid legit questions, which does not mean you are scum BUT You made a judgment on someone as being scummy. I simply asked you to back up up your accusation.
I provided you with examples, can you do the same?Iron Butterfly wrote:2) I am not protecting pershy. I am pointing out how you made a sweeping generalization.
That I backed up right after rushed in and tried to call me out.Iron Butterfly wrote:3) No need for the language. Im getting tire of folks who when they cant defend their argument feel its ok to insult. Lets keep it civil please.
I am getting tired of folks you feel that can say whatever they please and not have anything said back to them. so you don;t throw the first stone, I don't throw one back, agreed?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:Easy both of you, this is going nowhere. Compared to me your both fresh blood. Drop it and go elsewhere.
pershy wrote:Wow - all quiet on the western front in the last 24 hours. Ironb is at least putting some contributions forward that make sense.
I'm still leaning towards William. Mainly because he jumped on me and then accused someone of protecting me. As I know that's not the case I found it scummy so my vote stands for now.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
dazza2008 wrote:I need a replacelment for Raston_Morue. He has asked to be replaced.
Ragian wrote:dazza2008 wrote:I need a replacelment for Raston_Morue. He has asked to be replaced.
Do you want suggestions?
dazza2008 wrote:Ragian wrote:dazza2008 wrote:I need a replacelment for Raston_Morue. He has asked to be replaced.
Do you want suggestions?
If you know someone ask them.
I just really posted it so you guys know the situation. I have posted in the replacement thread.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users