Moderator: Community Team
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Leehar wrote:Maybe confusing was the wrong word? Too much irrelevent/unnecessary info thats only distracting and isn't immediately informative?
MoB Deadly wrote:Leehar wrote:Maybe confusing was the wrong word? Too much irrelevent/unnecessary info thats only distracting and isn't immediately informative?
I like seeing all the players without having to go back to page 1 because I check it a lot from my phone and I don't want to forget about players.
How is the color? I made it darker and bolded it to make it easier to read.
That wouldn't be interesting.dazza2008 wrote:Its better but why don't you just use black?
I want to play, but the holiday season may slightly draw down my activity level. The real issue is that we are stuck in the Day 1 area and don't have anything to go on anymore. In an attempt to alleviate this I am no going to go back and see if a can drudge up anything resembling a case. But don't get your hopes set too high, I am not a miracle worker and whatever I come back with will probably be pretty lame.Iron Butterfly wrote:This is getting annoying. I guess no one wants to play?
Here he is starting the initial bandwagon against Shield. Now, there are multiple possibilities for his potential motivation in such an action. If he is scum he could be trying to start up a case (any case) in order to avoid one starting on him or one of his scum mates. Additionally, he picked an inactive player with a bit of a reputation for not coming up with that good of defenses to start this case against. This could be a scummy sign that he either hoped shield wouldn't come back and would be lynched based on that, or that he hopped shield would come back and make a fail defense. A comparatively easy lynch in either case.dazza2008 wrote:I just had a look through and all Shield has said is in and confirm. vote shieldgenerator7
Here he expresses the sentiment that holding Shield at L-1 wouldn't be so bad. Perhaps he was hopping for someone not thinking to come by and hammer? That would provide him with a swift end to the lynch today and a target that would either draw cop investigations tonight and/or be the main case tomorrow.dazza2008 wrote:Yeah. I don't get why everyone worries so much about getting someone to L-1. If there is a hammer out of the blue it would most certainly be scum who did it so whats the worry?
He jumps on the Hippo bandwagon, ensuring that it would become the dominate case on be very likely to at least reach the point where a claim would be required. And we now can all see how that worked out.dazza2008 wrote:Unvote as SG7 was replaced.
I find Hippo very scummy here. He seems to be all over the place. Vote Hippo
spiesr wrote:Alright thus begins the trawl through the thread. First thing I notice is that Mob needs to update the first post to include Strikewolf's replacement of Shield.
Anyhow after rereading the game, I have decided that a case against Dazza would be the most interesting.Here he is starting the initial bandwagon against Shield. Now, there are multiple possibilities for his potential motivation in such an action. If he is scum he could be trying to start up a case (any case) in order to avoid one starting on him or one of his scum mates. Additionally, he picked an inactive player with a bit of a reputation for not coming up with that good of defenses to start this case against. This could be a scummy sign that he either hoped shield wouldn't come back and would be lynched based on that, or that he hopped shield would come back and make a fail defense. A comparatively easy lynch in either case.dazza2008 wrote:I just had a look through and all Shield has said is in and confirm. vote shieldgenerator7Here he expresses the sentiment that holding Shield at L-1 wouldn't be so bad. Perhaps he was hopping for someone not thinking to come by and hammer? That would provide him with a swift end to the lynch today and a target that would either draw cop investigations tonight and/or be the main case tomorrow.dazza2008 wrote:Yeah. I don't get why everyone worries so much about getting someone to L-1. If there is a hammer out of the blue it would most certainly be scum who did it so whats the worry?He jumps on the Hippo bandwagon, ensuring that it would become the dominate case on be very likely to at least reach the point where a claim would be required. And we now can all see how that worked out.dazza2008 wrote:Unvote as SG7 was replaced.
I find Hippo very scummy here. He seems to be all over the place. Vote Hippo
In conclusion, this case that extensive or great, but on Day 1 I think it is interesting enough to take a look at. Unvote Vote Dazza.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Leehar wrote:I wouldn't actually have been against voting against dazza to get some good momentum going and perhaps maybe a useful claim as well, but he's been quick to try dispel rumours so not really sure if it'll work.
Who's the most experienced mafia campaigner here anyway? What do you guys do other than joke votes on Day 1? I remember from a previous game that Safari was all for advocating still lynching somebody on day 1 to get something out of it, but I'm really uncertain on that whole idea.
The only other thing to do would perhaps be to vote a no lynch, but other than the fact that I hear it's supposedly a pretty scummy move, it could set up a bad precedent in that we could be stuck with this same situation tomorrow as well?
Tbh, I don't really think it would've been such a problem to lynch sg7 and be done with it? Heck, even when he was at L1, he didn't claim or anything to get off the hook, just said he was back active again. So whats special about him as opposed to hippo?
zimmah wrote:vote dazza, better then a no-lynch
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users