Non-VANILLA Game 3 *Game Over* 14 Winners

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:09 pm

Vote: Hitman079

You have been bothering my scum-smell this whole game.

Shadowstar · Post by **Shadowstar** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:14 pm

Seeing hitman yesterday, he is indeed suspicious. I won't vote him yet, but FOS Hitman.

pancakemix · Post by **pancakemix** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:25 pm

We were all waiting for a non-existent mason to come forth when he walks in, drops the hammer, and leaves. That is worthy of a FOS Hitman, but I want to hear a defense. If he says " I don't know how to defend myself" again, he gets my vote.

Aegnor · Post by **Aegnor** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:33 pm

Hitman079 wrote:jnd seems suspicious...he says he's a noob..but he doesn't look it to me..besides we do have a deadline, right? or someone back there said "no deadline"..anyways
vote jnd

Vote Hitman I've been suspecting him the whole game and this strange vote on JNB, *RIGHT BEFORE* he was about to get the final vote for the lynch, has done it for me.
My theory is that Hitman is scum and was trying to clear himself out by voting his fellow scum, after knowing that JNB was doomed anyway.

Primate · Post by **Primate** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:36 pm

jnd94 wrote:well, i have to applaude hitman. probably didnt read the last few pages, but voted, and when you all thought he was the stupidest piece of sh*t, he was right

This doesn't seem honest to anybody else?

It doesn't strike me as a post JND would make about scumbuddy.

pancakemix · Post by **pancakemix** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:36 pm

And he skimmed...

Bigger FOS Hitman.

Aegnor · Post by **Aegnor** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:39 pm

Thanks for bringing that quote up. I actually forgot about it. I meant to talk about it today. This further proves my theory about Hitman being a scum. JNB was obviously trying to force us to think "Wow, Hitman voted for scum, then he must be a townie". Noobish mistake really.

pancakemix · Post by **pancakemix** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:40 pm

He didn't do a very good job of it either. To me, it kind of seems sarcastic.

Aegnor · Post by **Aegnor** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:47 pm

BTW unriggable made a slip about his unkown roll in a different thread.
Am I allowed to say anything about it?

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:55 pm

Aegnor wrote:BTW unriggable made a slip about his unkown roll in a different thread.
Am I allowed to say anything about it?

Where?

Aegnor · Post by **Aegnor** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:55 pm

Tombstone mafia. I can PM you the quote if you want.

Syzygy · Post by **Syzygy** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:56 pm

Aegnor wrote:BTW unriggable made a slip about his unkown roll in a different thread.
Am I allowed to say anything about it?

I think you're allowed to.

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:56 pm

Aegnor wrote:Tombstone mafia. I can PM you the quote if you want.

Oh right. Well that much is evident, I just got killed by the damned mafia!

Aegnor · Post by **Aegnor** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:00 pm

unriggable wrote:
Aegnor wrote:Tombstone mafia. I can PM you the quote if you want.
Oh right. Well that much is evident, I just got killed by the damned mafia!

Ah true. Forget about what I said. There are also stand alone roles which he could still be one of.

Aegnor · Post by **Aegnor** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:05 pm

Which brings us again to this topic. Again there was only 1 kill. Are there no SK or Vig in this game, or the rollblocker is really that good?

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:05 pm

Aegnor wrote:Which brings us again to this topic. Again there was only 1 kill. Are there no SK or Vig in this game, or the rollblocker is really that good?

And the doc.

pancakemix · Post by **pancakemix** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:06 pm

You're dead!

Aegnor · Post by **Aegnor** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:07 pm

True. Also we might just assume at this point that the no-posters are yet again the ones who didn't send in their night choices and they might hold the Sk/Vig roles.

Aegnor · Post by **Aegnor** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:08 pm

But surely if that is the case, shouldn't we really replace them? What do you guys think?

red bull · Post by **red bull** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:09 pm

i hate it when there roles are unknown it give us nothing on scum

pancakemix · Post by **pancakemix** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:09 pm

Vote to replace it makes the game more fun.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:09 pm

I don't care one way or the other... I know I am tired of submariners...

Either they die as we vote them to lynch or they get replaced... I'm fine either way... It WOULD be fun if we had some more posters, though!

red bull · Post by **red bull** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:09 pm

Vote to replace get a good DOC!!!!!!!!!!

Aegnor · Post by **Aegnor** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:12 pm

I don't know anarki.. I think that our lynches will be more efficient if we take out active mafia instead of harmless no-posters. (Having them replaced will make the game indeed more fun).

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:13 pm

Primate wrote:
jnd94 wrote:well, i have to applaude hitman. probably didnt read the last few pages, but voted, and when you all thought he was the stupidest piece of sh*t, he was right
This doesn't seem honest to anybody else?

It doesn't strike me as a post JND would make about scumbuddy.

It does to me since JND has repeatedly denied the fact that he was scum even after death when his damn role was revelaed. Also I've had mafia partners drop hammers on me before to try and cover their arse. it dopesn't usually work that well.

Vote Hitman

Also Vote to modkill inactives as replacesments are hard to get ion proerply and besides which we probably end up losing an SK and maybe a mafia for the potential loss of a vig or doc or something, which while harsh, is possibly the best chance we're going to get.